I suppose you could make an artificial head that is normalized and make a setting for it.
post #46 of 1807
5/11/09 at 6:14pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!

|
Eyeglasses have the same design from person to person. A certain prescription will get you most of the way there. May be a bit blurry, but acceptable to pass the driver's test, and much better than where you started. If you want the perfect vision then get your exact numbers.
|
|
1. Through a Singlepower SDS-XLR and then comparing a single ended pair of HD650s through the same amp while playing the same music at the same volume level and finding it impossible to believe I was listening to the same amp. The joy of balanced! "I've gotta go this route, and now!"
|
|
except for the head tracking which really puts the sound outside your head in real space vs the best binaural or other processing that doesn't track head position in real space&time - resulting in your brain rejecting the spatial information when your head moves and the "image" turns with you - giving the usual "between your ears" headphone spatialization
|
|
But to say it doesn't come with a preset because it has a "night and day" difference from the next (average) user is a load.
|
|
In the WSR article, Stephen Smyth states: "we decided to ensure that our systems ship with what we call generic room responses, to give you some type of experience prior to initiating a personalized measurement."
So it will come with presets (unless they changed their minds), but those presets will not be as good as your own personalized measurement. |
|
Actually, this is the most relevant new "subjective fact" I've read in a while. I've been trying to decide whether or not to reconfigure my setup to include XLR connections and your comment is very illuminating.
My current [1995-vintage] arrangement involves a Stax SRM-T1S amp and Omega-1 heaphones plugged into the amp. The [single ended RCA] line input to the Stax amp comes from the RCA line output of a DBX 14/10 EQ, and the [single ended RCA] line input to the DBX EQ comes from the RCA headphone line output of the SVS Realiser. This arrangement allows me to benefit from the 14-band analog tone control of the EQ, something I've become unable to live without after maybe 25 years of use. Now an alternative possible configuration, which would eliminate the DBX EQ, might go as follows: SVS optical digital processed headphone output instead of analog RCA headphone output, going to the optical input of an external DAC (say Headroom or Neko Audio) which provides XLR balanced output. Then balanced XLR output of the DAC to XLR balanced input of the Stax SRM-T1S. So, current approach is (a) all single-ended RCA but (b) allows the use of the wonderful sounding DBX EQ. Granted, I've settled on a particular EQ preset that I never ever change (and which therefore might just as well have been a hard-wired "EQ chip" somewhere in the connection path, if possible) and which I use for ALL sources. I guess you might say this is my "set of prescription eyeglasses for my own ears" which makes listening to all sound sources 20-20, ie. "perfect" for me. Alternative approach uses (a) a presumably somewhat superior external DAC (e.g. Neko uses TI 1394a DSP, whereas SVS Realiser uses TI 1398 DSP) and (b) all XLR-balanced connections to the Stax amp, but (c) loses DBX EQ. I don't know if I could live without the EQ effect, but maybe the offsetting audible benefits of external DAC and XLR connections would make me change my mind. So... which do you think I would prefer? Would any difference between TI 1398 DAC chip and TI 1394a DAC chip be discernible? Would apparently audible improvement of XLR over RCA be more than offset by the loss of DBX EQ. Without a DBX EQ in the equation I suppose the answer would be a given, but in light of the EQ the answer seems much harder to intuit. Again... which sound would I prefer? I am looking forward to the CanJam show in a few weeks, specifically to answer these questions for myself through actual listening to the alternatives. The proof is in the pudding. I will bring all of my gear, to try it for myself (borrowing an external DAC and XLR cables there, hopefully). But your comments regarding the apparent and non-subtle magical difference of all-XLR sound vs. RCA, well that's something very interesting to hear. |
|
But I am convinced (subjectively, as you've correctly pointed out) that fully balanced headphone amps will take your headphone listening experience a long way further than single ended amps/phones possibly can. It's not at all subtle, IMO.
|
|
You can't help but to get a sh!t eating grin and just keep shaking your head repeatedly in disbelief.
|
