Quote:
|
You definitely misunderstood. My question was like.
It's shielding. Let's say you get 8% of RFI and EMI. Add ERS. Reduces RFI and EMI to 0%. My question is; How would that be "improving" if it's just shielding and getting the 0%, which is what it already should have been to begin with? Seriously, the word "improve" has been highly abused, shielding should not be "improving" the quality. It should just be "reducing the interference and returning the quality back to what it originally was". In another anatomy, it's like some third party software which reduces the "loudness" in digital music files. Oh how I wish that software was real. ![]() |
and now I understand your point, "reduce the degredation quality", it makes sense upon reading your explanation, and I agree with that
in terms of "improving" the quality, if you went from 8% to 0%, wouldn't that be an improvement in quality? (in the sense that less interference means a more true signal, hence improved sound??
)










