Quote:
|
My impressions on every can I've ever heard: surprisingly pretty good if not shockingly quite bad or somewhere in between.
|

Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
My impressions on every can I've ever heard: surprisingly pretty good if not shockingly quite bad or somewhere in between.
|

|
I understand what you are saying and maybe this thread is better for those who have some experience and knowledge as opposed to a beginners guide. If you look at the 'big picture' the Senns are not hated, many like them and no one can agree on how they sound, which suggests they are a bit of a jack of all trades. That is another way I could have described them.
|
|
There are many reasons why people report conflicting or even totally contradictory descriptions of headphone characteristics, below are a few rationales. And I believe variation of opinion is due to several factors contributing at any one time.
The variation in the music we listen to. The system/equipment that we use. The reference that we use -headphone sound characteristics are relative to other headphones. That is to say that Headphone A may be bass centric in comparrison to Headphone B, but Headphone C is far bassier than Headphone A. Therefore A could be reported as having a lot of bass (in comparrison to Headphone B) or reported as being bass light (in comparrison to Headphone C). The experience and ability of the listener to describe what they are hearing. People who post other peoples opinion. The fact that some post opinions when they haven't even heard the headphone, but believe because they have read it, it must be so. People report from memory and memory isn't very reliable when it comes to how things sound. People report after hearing something for 5 minutes or from brief encounters in noisy distracting environments. Hearing aclimatization- we become used to the sound, so the headphone no longer has that dominate trait, or lacks that aspect to such a degree Fanboyism Trolls Shills |

|
In that process of headphone swapping, your ears are calibrated/acclimated to the cans you just finished listening to instead of the sound of live instruments so it is not a valid way to assess a headphones performance. It is better if one knows these things before going to a meet
![]() |

|
Or...they have no strong sound of their own, which could explain the terms "boring" and "anaemic" and all the apparent contradictions. That relative colourlessness is in fact what I like about them: to me they don't interfere with the music nearly as much as most other phones. It's interesting that if you go back to the very introduction of the 595 you'll find the term "boring" popping up most often in threads about them. Few people had specific objections (except the term "grainy" which I fear I still don't understand), but many called them "boring". To me this suggests the writers were looking for a particular quality, or colour, in their phones, something that could get their blood rushing. The 595 doesn't do that, and its relative neutrality was what I loved about it from the first day I put it on my head (ah...memories!).
Of course choice of music plays a large part here. |
