Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › PS1000s shipping
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

PS1000s shipping - Page 7

post #91 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferraro25 View Post
Yes, I had the HD800 on preorder at some point, but since getting the HD650 and returning the D7000 (tons of lower bass + lots of treble + thin mids = fun, but not fitting for something that aims to be high end, IMO), I've woken up. $1000 is the limit for me, now.
i'm not sure EMU/total airhead + HD800 or PS1000 is the best division of funds anyway.
post #92 of 644
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by robm321 View Post
I'm sure there will be plenty of flip flopping as HD800 and PS-1000 FOTM hits.

There will be a swell of these are the greatestest, most amazingingest things every, it will tame down a bit, but when the dust settles there's no doubt they will be added to the pile of top phones along with the others.

I'm glad to see Zanth and Joe's reviews right off the bat, because I think they are being very down to earth with their reviews. I'm still waiting for the bad things though. That's more interesting to me. It gives character to a headphone. Is the bass excessive? Does it have that overly liquid, glossed over PS-1 sound? Is it not neutral, just natural? We already know Grado wouldn't release a $1,700 phone that doesn't sound great

BTW, I asked the same thing on the HD800 thread and everyone that heard them was afraid to say something negative. I got several PMs about what their faults were because they were afraid of being attacked and wanted to not post it on the thread itself. I think that's a shame, but it is the environment I guess since this is a small community. I mean look at all the people already defending the car board box. I'm a Grado fan and always have been, but I'm not a blind idiot that will defend everything the company does good or bad, YMMV...

The one thing that may be a deal breaker for me is that they can't be listened to lying down. If I have to sit straight up and still, I will just listen to my speakers... hmmm... hope they are burning in 24/7 - can't wait for more impressions.
Yep. Lying down is definitely out. Interesting comments about the 800s and peoples reluctance to talk. Just reading the buzz hyping the leading edge definition and speed makes me suspicous. 20 years in high end audio and I've yet to hear those words used in any context that also includes the notions of warmth and body. Thin and etched are usually the next words in those kinds of descriptions.

I really haven't had enough time with the 1000s to judge their systemic colorations. Two quick things that struck me though last night I regard as promising indicators. The differences between recordings seemed to be greater than I hear with the other phones I have around with distinct thumb prints (think the RS1s and Denons here). Particulary in terms of image size and distance. Distant recordings sounded really distant. Up front recordings sounded really up front. It struck me almost immediately compared to most other phones that make everything fit their own predefined thumb print. And low level details were simply popping out where I didn't expect them, or hadn't noticed them before. Especially low level textural and ambient cues. Glossed over wasn't what struck me out the gate.

Joe
post #93 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferraro25 View Post
How much have prices on Grados lowered over the years?
The prices have been lowering for the older models as the new i series is being rolled out but in terms of MSRP, the prices haven't dropped, but they haven't gone up either. The RS-1's had an MSRP of $695 when they were first released and they have the same now. The price didn't go up with inflation. So in effect, they are far cheaper now than 10 years ago.
post #94 of 644
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by robm321 View Post
Thanks Joe for the review. Very well explained. In fact, I would say that your description of the OO7 was refreshing to me. I've always felt those things were amazing in how they resolve everything, but they were simply boring overall. I need the impact. That goes for speakers too. E-stats would only be coinsidered as a second system for me. Dynamics just sound more palpable and real.

Anyway, I think the shock about the sound is that you haven't heard a PS-1. From what you and Zanth have described, these have the PS-1 sound but with a bigger soundstage. The PS-1, especially with vocals is pretty amazing. My only problem with it was that it had it's own coloration which caused all the CD, LPs played through it sound like, well, a PS-1 and the same. Have you noticed that with the PS-1000 or are different recordings sounding vastly different.

Also, in regards to the GS-1000, what were you using to amp them. They can sound spikey and recessed in the mids or more upfront mids and smoother highs depending on the system. Your explanation of the RS-1 and GS-1000 was dead on with what I experienced owning both. Except that the GS-1000 could really change with a system.

Again, thanks for the review, and It helps that we share the same taste. These phones seem colored compared to what I'm hearing about the HD800, but at this point they seem much more interesting to me

Hmmm, K-1000 and PS-1000... I might be done, but I may still like the HP-2 better, I need to call my dealer and ask when he's getting his demo pair in.
Interesting comments on the 007s. You know, the thing is I don't think it's just the phones. I think they need a tube amp with balls and unfortunately the Woo GES is not that. I find the Stax tube amps antisceptic and boring. In comparison the Woo is deligthfully natural sounding (why shouldn't it be? Class A triodes driving stats?). But there is a definite lack of gain and drive. Not sure if the Blue Hawaii is the answer as that archictecture just looks kind of odd to me. But I always feel the 007s are being let down by not having an amp grab them by the balls and slap them around. A background listening experience at best. And the whole head band / clamping arrangement is just downright uncomfortable. Putting them on is more like installing some sort of appliance onto your head rather than just putting on a pair of phones. But within their limits they can sound beguiling in small doses. I hang on to them in hopes of finding the magic amp for them some day. There just seems to be an incredible amount of untapped potentail there. So for now I invariably gravitate back to dynamics.

Joe
post #95 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canman View Post
Then when do you use your K1000!
ha ha - you got me there. Those are the ones that I use when sitting at the computer or kicking back in a chair (outside of the sweet spot of speakers) or when It's early or late and I have to be quiet (neighbors).

The main reason I liked the GS-1000s is if I want to go to bed and listen to music AND needed a large sound stage (symphonies, classical), I can listen to them laying down. Obviously, I use a pillow that keeps my head angled enough to make it work

I've actually listened to the K-1000s laying down, but that is far from ideal.
post #96 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by robm321 View Post
The main reason I liked the GS-1000s is if I want to go to bed and listen to music AND needed a large sound stage (symphonies, classical), I can listen to them laying down.
I take it you don't have a wife sleeping next to you? Myself, I'm relegated to using my trusted ER4Ps in bed....
post #97 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by robm321 View Post
Is the bass excessive?
The bass is authoritative but not out of control. It isn't as hard to tame as the PS-1's. Whereas many enjoyed the PS-1's bass, some found it overwhelming, particularly if coming from a leaner headphone. There is a distinct kinship with the style of bass of the GS-1000's and the PS-1's in lineage but not so much as with the HP-1's. That is, an exceptionally snappy leading edge but shortened decay. The PS-1000's offer a great attack but the decay is longer, the sound lingers. Some may feel this is exaggerated bass, others will feel this is realistic bass. Best way to sample this is with a test disc that has bass note tracks. It becomes very easy to tell which sounds more real.

Quote:
Does it have that overly liquid, glossed over PS-1 sound? Is it not neutral, just natural?
It is more liquid than the GS-1000's but less liquid than the PS-1's. It therefore sounds more transparent than the PS-1's. As Sanderman indicates, switching up discs one gets to understand the disc very well, yes there is a fun sound throughout, but it is not a "heavy handed" colouration. It's funny to think that the PS-1's are heavily coloured when many (when first released) felt the RS-1's were heavily coloured in comparison and that the PS-1's were so very close to the HP-1's but with better bass and a faster sound. Then folks started to write that the GS-1000's were less coloured and more transparent. With the PS-1000's it sounds like they are not as dry as the GS-1000's but also they don't gloss over details, it merely seems to be a more organic sound. Again, a great way to test this is with a few discs where it is very apparent the music was very close mic'd or the opposite (test discs again are great for this) so that one can feel confident in the ability of the phones. This goes for any headphone.

One has to remember, at least for me, when commenting on differences, we are talking the last 10-15% of music here. When comparing Grados as a group, differences will be quite audible for those familiar with the headphones and one will easily be able to pick out variances; however, we are dealing with the same family of headphones. Those thinking that the difference between a GS-1000 and a PS-1000 will be akin to the difference between iBuds and Omega II's are going to be in for an unwelcome surprise.

What occurs then is that one will realize something like this: "hey, when I'm listening to headphone X, I'm never thinking about getting something better, I hear what I think is everything on the recording and I'm really really enjoying the music."

What is even better is something like this: "When I had headphone Z I thought it was everything I had always wanted, but I have a hard time listening to it now that I have headphone X. It seems to offer something more, hard to articulate what, but it sounds more musical, more true to life."

Quote:
The one thing that may be a deal breaker for me is that they can't be listened to lying down. If I have to sit straight up and still, I will just listen to my speakers... hmmm... hope they are burning in 24/7 - can't wait for more impressions.
Like most big headphones, listening to them while lying down takes effort. I try to listen to my headphones in the position that Dr. Meier describes on his site. This helps when lying down because the pads are already pushed foward; however, they are big and like the R10's, or L3000's or other larger headphones, laying down and having a listen be tricky to get the positioning right.
post #98 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by snejk
I take it you don't have a wife sleeping next to you? Myself, I'm relegated to using my trusted ER4Ps in bed....
With my last girlfriend, I didn't listen to music at night. Period. I guess I was still at a point where I felt like I was shutting her out by listening to music while sleeping next to her. So, I never even attempted to go there. I'd imagine being married it's a bit different because it's a long term thing and you tend to settle in a bit more.

But, yes, I am single and don't have to worry about stuff like that at the moment. I'm sure this privilege will go away before too long, so maybe I shouldn't pick a phone based on this.

Depending how things work out, I may still get a UE11 to cover all my needs with isolation and kicking back and decide on a single headphones K-1000 most likely unless the PS-1000 or HD800 can be the be all, end all for me. That is the ideal anyway.
post #99 of 644
Apart from Sanderman who else received their PS1000? Pray tell.
post #100 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by robm321 View Post
BTW, I asked the same thing on the HD800 thread and everyone that heard them was afraid to say something negative. I got several PMs about what their faults were because they were afraid of being attacked and wanted to not post it on the thread itself.


Say what?

People have begging in that thread for impressions, favorable and otherwise. So now you are you saying that "everyone that heard them" had negative impressions, but all of these people are afraid to post about it? So all of these same people posted false positive impressions instead, and then they sent the truth by PM only to you?
post #101 of 644
Thanks Zanth and Joe! I asked for possible negatives, you gave them, and now I'm actually getting more interested in these. I have always liked the bass on the GS-1000s.

To me the RS-1 and GS-1000 is more colored than the PS-1. I really like the PS-1 - I think it sounds colored because I am now used to the HP-1000. I am very glad to hear that the sound is not as liquid as the PS-1 but not as dry as the GS-1000, can I get an amen on that? That is exactly where I'd like it to be.

Anyway, great descriptions of the sound and comparisons. It seems like the PS-1000 might really be something special.

iamoneagain, you better hold on to your wallet or L3000 tightly I think this is pretty much what you were hoping for when you originally got the GS-1000s
post #102 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanderman View Post
Interesting comments on the 007s. You know, the thing is I don't think it's just the phones. I think they need a tube amp with balls and unfortunately the Woo GES is not that. I find the Stax tube amps antisceptic and boring. In comparison the Woo is deligthfully natural sounding (why shouldn't it be? Class A triodes driving stats?). But there is a definite lack of gain and drive. Not sure if the Blue Hawaii is the answer as that archictecture just looks kind of odd to me. But I always feel the 007s are being let down by not having an amp grab them by the balls and slap them around. A background listening experience at best. And the whole head band / clamping arrangement is just downright uncomfortable. Putting them on is more like installing some sort of appliance onto your head rather than just putting on a pair of phones. But within their limits they can sound beguiling in small doses. I hang on to them in hopes of finding the magic amp for them some day. There just seems to be an incredible amount of untapped potentail there. So for now I invariably gravitate back to dynamics.

Joe
I dont think the requirement of a five thousand dollar amp [+shipping] is much help to the argument of the SR007mk2 .
post #103 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by vcoheda View Post
i'm not sure EMU/total airhead + HD800 or PS1000 is the best division of funds anyway.
Absolutely not (I'm agreeing with you), but I am buying a Woo Audio 6 tonight.

edited to add: As for source, I might upgrade that in the next year.
post #104 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orcin View Post
Say what?

People have begging in that thread for impressions, favorable and otherwise. So now you are you saying that "everyone that heard them" had negative impressions, but all of these people are afraid to post about it? So all of these same people posted false positive impressions instead, and then they sent the truth by PM only to you?
I've corrected my post. It was misleading. I should read my posts before just leaving them out there like that. I apologize. I didn't mean to downplay the HD800.

I had 1 person contact me saying he was afraid to post a negative comment in fear of some backlash (which has happened before with other headphones as well) and 2 others willing to share the potential cons of the HD800. That's all. They weren't negative overall impressions, just possible negatives along with positive aspects.

I will keep their info confidential because I am also in fear of backlash and would like to be trusted in the future for keeping these things private. There is nothing major or groundbreaking. I had a pre-order on the HD800s and probed for some info other than the "these are perfect and can do no wrong" stuff which was not off base, it just didn't tell the whole story, but that's always the case up front. It's always down the road that you find out the little flaws as you listen more and those can usually be picked out even on a short listen usually as possible issues that might be a problem long term.

From all the impressions of the HD800 and PS-1000 and PMs, I can say they are both very amazing phones... but not absolutely perfect (which should not be a suprise to anyone at this point)... that is all
post #105 of 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zanth View Post
The prices have been lowering for the older models as the new i series is being rolled out but in terms of MSRP, the prices haven't dropped, but they haven't gone up either. The RS-1's had an MSRP of $695 when they were first released and they have the same now. The price didn't go up with inflation. So in effect, they are far cheaper now than 10 years ago.
Good point. But who knows what will be available five years from now?

edited to add: Especially if the ring driver becomes a new standard.

edit 2: And, correct me if I'm wrong, the RS-1 is generally considered in the league of the HD650, which is about half the price of the RS-1. Not that that means that (that that that, heh) there aren't people who consider the RS-1 to be worth twice the HD650, but still...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › PS1000s shipping