I don't need juicy story's, but critical comparison, which I can not see so far. You just re-read his GS1k vs PS1k impressions and tell me what's up there that make PS1k so different, based on it I mean. Its says, better texture, mids, warmth. Well, I have enough records that can give you same result with GS1k. I did own 4 different GS1000 so far, one of them, stock, was very warm sounding compare to my own. I was very surprised about that fact, but didn't keep them after all. I guess they were over 1000 hours brake in time and maybe been used quite heavy, while my weren't, even now they are not overheat. To me, RS1 was already a joke to compare with GS1k, even PS1 didn't keep up their place. But now we seem to get something "new", which to me, reading this, are not.
Simple example, I tried HD650 with upgrade RAL cable and Rudi RPX100. The results were like to metallic for my taste. On the other hand use them with Zana Deux and you get whole different sound from the same headphones, way more natural and musical. I am not even talking about their stock wire, cos its just poor, so, the re-cabling is one proof, if you mean that. Another is just twicking the driver slightly or even not that, just putting in differ position would make a huge difference, imo, been discused o lot up here to.
I don't want to repeat myself here, so, I need criticism and not soapy brain wash...
Quote:
Originally Posted by vvanrij 
No offense here Blackmore, especially not since you are another dutch head-fi'er, but you keep commenting on it like a recabled DIY GS1000 with some metal strapped on it. Do you have any proof on how these are the same cans as the GS1000 whatsoever besides the outline shape?
|