Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Has Anyone Tried the New Graham Slee Solo SRG - Only $435 (But Climbing)???
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Has Anyone Tried the New Graham Slee Solo SRG - Only $435 (But Climbing)??? - Page 3

post #31 of 39
Thread Starter 

Perhaps...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fido2 View Post
Yes! I too have been looking at the GS amps. I love my little Voyager so much I have been really wanting to try the bigger amps. More reviews!!

PS: One last shot on the "conspiracy theory" thing. If you investigate the creation of the Federal Reserve system, the seven men(who incidentally owned 1/4 of the WORLDS wealth at that time) who met secretly and conjured up this "system" and the way they went about getting it enacted, if that's not a conspiracy I don't know what is.
Perhaps... the hard asset monetary system we can use is... headfi gear!

But... a few people meeting to design a monetary system is not, necessarily a "conspiracy."

And... the problem is not "fiat money" per se... it is abuse of a "fiat money" monetary system. And... more importantly... since Jan 21, totally insane economic policies, which are totally "anti-growth" and "inflationary" (excess money chasing too little production), with too little credit availability - all of which is artificially created, as the result of abject ignorance of economics, and the "root causes" of the recent crisis.

Very little of it has anything to do with "greed," and fraud on Wall Street (laughable). Though, the problem was exacerbated by excessively leveraging the value of the sub-prime mortgages (i.e. failure of regulation - again Washington). It has everything to do with the "root causes" I noted before, which were created by the literal "fools" in Washington, which now have all the power.

They created the "root cause" in the late 70's (Community Reinvestment Act and forcing banks to make sub-prime mortgages, etc.), exacerbated it in the late 90's (with repeal of Glass-Steagall, permitting trading of commodities by speculators, elimination of the "up-tick" rule, relaxation of margin requirements, and enactment of the "mark-to-market" rule, etc.), and have blocked every attempt to reform it all since then. Read Friedman... and... you'll learn a lot from actual empirical evidence, not misleading "ideology."
post #32 of 39
Well I most wholeheartedly agree with you on the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act which kept a lot of wall street shenanigans in check. But it's obvious you haven't done a thorough review of the origins of the federal reserve system. So we'll just get back to GS headphone amps before we start throwing chairs ....
post #33 of 39
this amp very detail, but I find a bit less punchy than RPX-33
post #34 of 39
what phones and source were you using with it ztsen? thanks
post #35 of 39
iphone line out, chord cable and D5k(mod)
post #36 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by ztsen View Post
this amp very detail, but I find a bit less punchy than RPX-33
Do you have the PSU1 or are you using the switching psu? How many hours of burn-in do you have in both amps?

FWIW you are comparing the Solo SRG w/ an amp that costs 2.5 to 3.25 times more depending on the psu selected for the Solo SRG.
post #37 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gradofan2 View Post
I had to start a new thread... since... not many have heard about this new amp... at a new price.

Since Mrarroyo has "brought me up to speed"... the Solo thread needs to be resurrected...

... in the light of the GS Solo SRG, which is "now on sale."

Solo SRG Headphone Amplifier: Solo Studio Reference Green Headphone Amplifier

I don't know how long its been out... but... it seems like its virtually a "well-kept secret."

It doesn't seem to be discussed prominently on the GS web site... and... you have to dig it out on the "on-line store" page. Once there... there is quite a description of what GS has done to improve the sound of the 2007 Solo, and its variations.

I can find no reviews of it... but...

Reportedly... the Solo SRG has been designed to drive both high and low impedance phones to their optimum - which is an achievement, because, while I thought the 2007 Solo was superb with Senns (moderate/high impedance phones), I thought it struggled with Denons, Grados and other low impedance phones. I demoed a couple last year - would have kept one, if... it had been "superb" with both.

Well... as usual... GS has upgraded the Solo to perform well with both (reportedly)... and... now... I suppose I'll have to try the latest version... just to see for myself. But... I'd like to see if anyone else has the latest version (the SRG) and if it, indeed, "is up to the billings."

Mrarroyo reports he will soon be "giving it a spin" and reporting the results... but in the interim... I'd be curious who else has tried the Solo SRG... and what they think of it... especially compared to other SS amps??? Particularly, in light of the current price of about $435 with the walwart, and about $600 with the PSU1 - at last you can buy one for a reasonable price - thanks primarily to the dramatic increase in the value of the USD relative to the GBP (unfortunately for all our US exporters - Boeing, Deere, CAT, etc.)!

For those interested in whether the Solo / SRG can drive low-impedance phones, here's the exchange I had with Graham on his forum. Graham really takes the time to explain his products and design concepts to his customers. And he reverts within a couple of hours...

Graham's replies may be a bit technical, but I'm sure some of you will find his technical descriptions useful.

_______________

KDS:

"Thanks Graham for taking the time to explain my queries in such great detail. I really appreciate it. It's not always that a manufacturer takes such pains to explain his products to his customers."

GS:

"I've always tried to make myself available to the guys who put food on my table. I found I couldn't answer the phone anymore and still get my work done so I put this "community" online in a bid to address that."

KDS:

"I'm really enjoying the Solo SRG with my RS1 and MS-Pro. These phones really shine when driven by the SRG. However, there seems to be a perception that the Solos before the SRG were not ideal for driving low impedence phones like the Grados. If it's not too much to ask, was there a conscious effort to make the Solo more "Grado friendly" when you designed the SRG? I haven't heard the earlier versions of the Solo, but the SRG drives my RS1 so well that I can't imagine that the earlier Solos weren't ideal for low-impedence phones."

GS:

"The original Solo was designed when I had no money, using a pair of SR60's which are 32 Ohms. I invested some of what I made back into the development budget at which point I bought the high impedance Sennheiser HD's...

We have been making the original resistively coupled output Solo right up to the "2007". There were a number of changes in its development but it always had the same output resistor. Nearly all the "rave" reviews the Solo had were by reviewers using low impedance headphones like the Grado RS1. Phil Gold (ejtm) reviewed it using K701's...

The SRG was a development of the "green Solo experiment": the "green" used a 33 Ohm output resistor which, by the way, some famous headphone amps also do.

The SRG also uses a 33 Ohm resistor but it's inside a negative feedback loop (a second negative feedback loop in fact) which effectively reduces its impedance to 5 or 6 Ohms throughout the audio band and way beyond. I liked the idea so much I included the second negative feedback loop idea in the Novo I was also working on at the time - that just beat 4 similarly priced amps in a What Hi-Fi head to head - I think it works?

PS. the 33 Ohm resistor is to enable it to continue using the original "fast" small signal transistor output stage: the 2nd NFB makes it "almost direct", but a short circuit puts it immediately back to 33 Ohms, protecting the transistors."

_______________

For me, the SRG works beautifully with my RS1 and MS-Pro My short impressions on the SRG can be found elsewhere in this forum.
post #38 of 39

You're nearly correct about distance selling.  You have to contact the seller within 7 days to state you're intent to return, you then actually have 28 days to get the item back to them.  The item must be as new & with all packaging.  The seller is obliged to refund ALL costs, inclusive of return postage, some places state they don't refund postage &/or add a 'restocking fee'. They are not allowed to do either, it's illegal, simple as that . . . a warning to report them to trading standards usually solves that problem.  Please pass this info on at every given opportunity because people are being ripped-off all over the place.

post #39 of 39

have u read the headfonia review? i feel that it points out very well the sonic aspects of the amp:)

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphone Amps (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Has Anyone Tried the New Graham Slee Solo SRG - Only $435 (But Climbing)???