Quote:
Originally Posted by Gradofan2 
I had to start a new thread... since... not many have heard about this new amp... at a new price.
Since Mrarroyo has "brought me up to speed"... the Solo thread needs to be resurrected...
... in the light of the GS Solo SRG, which is "now on sale." Solo SRG Headphone Amplifier: Solo Studio Reference Green Headphone Amplifier
I don't know how long its been out... but... it seems like its virtually a "well-kept secret."
It doesn't seem to be discussed prominently on the GS web site... and... you have to dig it out on the "on-line store" page. Once there... there is quite a description of what GS has done to improve the sound of the 2007 Solo, and its variations.
I can find no reviews of it... but...
Reportedly... the Solo SRG has been designed to drive both high and low impedance phones to their optimum - which is an achievement, because, while I thought the 2007 Solo was superb with Senns (moderate/high impedance phones), I thought it struggled with Denons, Grados and other low impedance phones. I demoed a couple last year - would have kept one, if... it had been "superb" with both.
Well... as usual... GS has upgraded the Solo to perform well with both (reportedly)... and... now... I suppose I'll have to try the latest version... just to see for myself. But... I'd like to see if anyone else has the latest version (the SRG) and if it, indeed, "is up to the billings."
Mrarroyo reports he will soon be "giving it a spin" and reporting the results... but in the interim... I'd be curious who else has tried the Solo SRG... and what they think of it... especially compared to other SS amps??? Particularly, in light of the current price of about $435 with the walwart, and about $600 with the PSU1 - at last you can buy one for a reasonable price - thanks primarily to the dramatic increase in the value of the USD relative to the GBP (unfortunately for all our US exporters - Boeing, Deere, CAT, etc.)!
|
For those interested in whether the Solo / SRG can drive low-impedance phones, here's the exchange I had with Graham on his forum. Graham really takes the time to explain his products and design concepts to his customers. And he reverts within a couple of hours...
Graham's replies may be a bit technical, but I'm sure some of you will find his technical descriptions useful.
_______________
KDS:
"Thanks Graham for taking the time to explain my queries in such great detail. I really appreciate it. It's not always that a manufacturer takes such pains to explain his products to his customers."
GS:
"I've always tried to make myself available to the guys who put food on my table. I found I couldn't answer the phone anymore and still get my work done so I put this "community" online in a bid to address that."
KDS:
"I'm really enjoying the Solo SRG with my RS1 and MS-Pro. These phones really shine when driven by the SRG. However, there seems to be a perception that the Solos before the SRG were not ideal for driving low impedence phones like the Grados. If it's not too much to ask, was there a conscious effort to make the Solo more "Grado friendly" when you designed the SRG? I haven't heard the earlier versions of the Solo, but the SRG drives my RS1 so well that I can't imagine that the earlier Solos weren't ideal for low-impedence phones."
GS:
"The original Solo was designed when I had no money, using a pair of SR60's which are 32 Ohms. I invested some of what I made back into the development budget at which point I bought the high impedance Sennheiser HD's...
We have been making the original resistively coupled output Solo right up to the "2007". There were a number of changes in its development but it always had the same output resistor. Nearly all the "rave" reviews the Solo had were by reviewers using low impedance headphones like the Grado RS1. Phil Gold (ejtm) reviewed it using K701's...
The SRG was a development of the "green Solo experiment": the "green" used a 33 Ohm output resistor which, by the way, some famous headphone amps also do.
The SRG also uses a 33 Ohm resistor but it's inside a negative feedback loop (a second negative feedback loop in fact) which effectively reduces its impedance to 5 or 6 Ohms throughout the audio band and way beyond. I liked the idea so much I included the second negative feedback loop idea in the Novo I was also working on at the time - that just beat 4 similarly priced amps in a What Hi-Fi head to head - I think it works?
PS. the 33 Ohm resistor is to enable it to continue using the original "fast" small signal transistor output stage: the 2nd NFB makes it "almost direct", but a short circuit puts it immediately back to 33 Ohms, protecting the transistors."
_______________
For me, the SRG works beautifully with my RS1 and MS-Pro

My short impressions on the SRG can be found elsewhere in this forum.