Build Quality: For something hand built, the overall build quality is quite good. Of course, it isn’t nearly as perfect as something from a plastic molding machine but it is far ahead from the...
Disclaimer: My only other good cans to compare these to are Beyerdynamics DT770 (250). I fully realize this review will be biased because of that. So please keep that in mind. This review is my...
First Impressions:
Well, when I first used these, I used them in the same place I'd expect myself to continue using these, on the go from place to place, and while at places outside the...
I bought these this week from amazon.co.uk for £10 including delivery. That's US $15.
Packaging, appearance, warranty, euro-nanny knows best:
Mine arrived in the small European packaging box,...
Absolutely beautiful little player. It's just a gorgeous chunk of tech that feels good to hold. For me personally tech has to have form as well as function and the AK120 doesn't disappoint on...
My understanding is the 2399 is the same as the 5998, both made by Tung-Sol. Tung-Sol also made some 5998 which are branded by IBM, but are the same as any other 5998.
Tung-Sol / Chatham/ The 2399 are mostly labelled Chatham. I have white and yellow labelled ones
Some are clear tops, some are like the ones shown above with the top getter
Yes, it's getting worse on head-fi. People don't want to learn it seems. Sometimes I spend 4 days reading threads with multiple hundred pages. I take notes and learn, but hey, who am I
Yes, it's getting worse on head-fi. People don't want to learn it seems. Sometimes I spend 4 days reading threads with multiple hundred pages. I take notes and learn, but hey, who am I
As it relates to the 2399, I'm not sure it's ever been established that its completely identical to the 5998 electrically. It's undoubtedly some slight tweak or variant of the 5998, and the looks are quite similar or course, but since I have never seen a data sheet on the 2399, not sure what exactly its specs are.
I also have tubes marked 6520 that appear to be 5998's internally even though 6520 is supposed to be an identical designation for the 6AS7G.
I'm sure Tung Sol had its reasons for all this, but its hard to decipher 50 years on.