Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Pictorial Review: Bose On-Ear
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Pictorial Review: Bose On-Ear

post #1 of 140
Thread Starter 
Intro:

After reading so much about Bose whether due to hype or bashing, I found myself wanting to hear them first hand. With that in mind, I plunged down to Fry's intending to get the Bose Around-Ear model. When I got there, however, the AE model is SOLD OUT! So I settled for the Bose On-Ear. I walked out of Fry's $170 short. I'll be using the Keces DA152 as a DAC/Amp with my computer as source. Quick note on the Keces, I found it to be superior to the Little Dot MKIII with Russian 6Zh1P-EV driver tubes in almost every aspect save for the slightly more spherical soundstage, smoother and warmer midrange of the Little Dot. Two most notable superiority of the Keces are the extension on both ends while giving quite a bit more impact on every note. Bose OE is burned in for over 24+ hours (improved considerably).

Equipment experience: (At the time of review)

Amp/DAC:
- iBasso D2 Boa
- Marantz 2230B
- Nuforce Icon
- Little Dot MKIII
- Keces DA152

Headphones:
- RE1/RE2
- Sennheiser HD280 Pro
- Denon D2000
- Stax SR-Lambda
- Audio Technica W5000

Pictures:















Build Quality/Appearance:

I must say, the build quality of OE isn't that great which is the last thing you would want from a headphone that costs $170. It's made of mostly plastic and I feel like it'll easily break whenever I'm handling it. Portability is great since the OE's very compact and you can fold it up and store it in the carrying case that it came with. The cable is detachable and very flexible which is another big plus if you're on the go.

Comfort:

The OE is as the name suggested, having a supra-aural design. Overall I would say that it's quite comfortable while it's not anywhere near the level of a D2000 and Stax if long music session's your thing. However, The OE's very light weighing in at just 5.2 ounce so it won't be weighing your head down. The paddings on the earcup are quite soft and they don't clamp very hard against your ears, resting gently on your ear. Due to the on ear design, your ears do get quite warm after say an hour or so wearing it and my ears get tired with the OE sitting there after around 2 hours.

Sound Quality:

Highs:
First of all, no harshness or sibilance can be detected which is a definite plus. I still remember the grating harsh highs and sibilance of my HD280 hurting my ears. So what about the other aspects? Well, the OE's highs are recessed and very muffled. More often than not, it's overpowered by the bass. Sparkles and extension are sorely lacking which always leave you wanting for more especially when there's presence of string instruments. The most notable short coming must be hearing cymbals on this headphone. They can sound like they're made of plastic in some cases!

Bass:
If you think your D5000 has a lot of bass quantity? THINK AGAIN! There's only one word to describe the Bose OE's bass: OVERPOWERING. Before burn-in, the OE was just plain crap which gives out one noted boom (much like the bad subwoofer in cars that pass by on the street with their volume maxed out). After burn-in, bass improved considerably. It's still overpowering and boomy, but much less so than before. Any hint of bass(especially sub-bass) in the music will be emphasized to a ridiculous level. Speed, bass extension and definition is lacking. Drums sound very unrealistic.

Mids:
Again, it's recessed and very muffled and not enjoyable at all. I feel like singers are singing through a cup. On the other hand, since bass is emphasized and greatly boosted, male singers that have a deep voice suffer mightily. Their vocals are often mixed with, for lack of a better word, the boom of the boomy bass.

Soundstage/Detail:
Before burn-in, I felt like music's playing in a tiny box which made me feel suffocating which burn-in cured. The OE has a in your face presentation with a diffused soundstage spanning from left ear to right ear and it's very narrow in terms of depth. Soundstage coherency is also lacking. Often times, you'll hear instruments on the opposite ends of the stage with vocal right in the middle but nothing else happening between them. Detail and Instrument separation's fair when bass is not present in music. If there's any bass in the music, you'll be lucky to hear other instruments clearly.

Overall:
The Bose On-Ear is an extremely dark headphone that has overpowering bass with little to no definition. Besides the overpowering bass, the most striking thing you'll hear when you first put them on is how muffled they sound. Then you'll notice their rolled off highs. Portability and comfort, however, is the OE's strong suit. For $170, they're definitely a poor performer especially since the HD280 Pro that I have was only $70 when I bought it and it's superior in many aspects.

Update After 50+ hours of burn-in:
This will be my final update as the sound of the OE hasn't changed much after the 30+ hour mark of burn-in but it has improved considerably. The most notable change is the bass. It has mellowed out a lot and doesn't intrude the other ranges nearly as much as before. Bass has tightened a lot more and has much more definition to it although it is still somewhat boomy. Like the bass, the lower midrange is still overemphasized but not as much as before. Soundstage also opened up a bit more. Overall, the OE reminds me of Shure E4C's(not 100% if it's E4C) sound signature(warm with rolled off highs and bass is on the boomy side), but a lot less clarity because the sound is muffled. If it isn't so muffled, the headphone would be decent and a lot more enjoyable. However, it's not $170 enjoyable; more like $70 - 80 enjoyable(IMHO).
post #2 of 140
Wow, this is probably the first BOSE review I've seen on head-fi. Props to you for being brave and actually buying a pair for yourself
post #3 of 140
Basically a train wreck huh...when will you be returning them?
post #4 of 140
Thread Starter 
You bet!
post #5 of 140
I wanna try 'em.
post #6 of 140
Are Bose really that bad? Or are the reviewers biased because this forum generally doesn't like Bose?

I'd like to see a professional review on head-fi about Bose products, because everywhere else I look, (Amazon reviews, Cnet reviews, etc) they get rather decent reviews and don't seem to be such pieces of trash that everyone here seems to say they are.

I'm not saying you're probably wrong, but I'm not sure I can believe that the review is coming from a 100% non-biased source.
post #7 of 140
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by iareConfusE View Post
Are Bose really that bad? Or are the reviewers biased because this forum generally doesn't like Bose?

I'd like to see a professional review on head-fi about Bose products, because everywhere else I look, (Amazon reviews, Cnet reviews, etc) they get rather decent reviews and don't seem to be such pieces of trash that everyone here seems to say they are.

I'm not saying you're probably wrong, but I'm not sure I can believe that the review is coming from a 100% non-biased source.
I tried to be as objective as I possibly could. However, assuming Bose isn't your first audiophile can, if you have a chance to listen to it and dissect it as I did, you'll come to the same conclusion.
post #8 of 140
I think you accurately summed up the OEs.(had a pair myself at one point)

Great accessment. The sound is terrible, but terrible because of the price you pay.
post #9 of 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by iareConfusE View Post
I'm not saying you're probably wrong, but I'm not sure I can believe that the review is coming from a 100% non-biased source.
Who says that those Amazon and CNET reviews aren't biased either? If anything, they are a tad on the ignorant side, because names like AKG and Grado are not well-known. Thus, they assume that BOSE is the end-all can, and think of it that way when they listen to their music through them.
post #10 of 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMarchingMule View Post
Who says that those Amazon and CNET reviews aren't biased either? If anything, they are a tad on the ignorant side, because names like AKG and Grado are not well-known. Thus, they assume that BOSE is the end-all can, and think of it that way when they listen to their music through them.
Maybe, but I'm sure at least a few of the Amazon reviewers thatare audiophiles that found Bose to be decent have actually tried other high quality headphone brands such as AKG, Sennheiser, and Grado. I just think the bias against Bose outweighs the bias for them; by a lot.

Well, my roommates got a pair of triports back home, so I'll give those a try when I get back to the states. Maybe they are as bad as all of you say they are, or maybe not.
post #11 of 140
Thanks for the review. That's exactly what I hear in the bose OE as well. Good comfort and portability, but completely torn apart by its sound quality.

Here's a little story of mine that happened about 7 months ago.

Being a student, I have never really spent over 50 bucks before on headphones, IEMs, back then. I had a Koss Porta Pro, with a cheap (But good) rockboxed sansa. I had a sansa for about 2 years, and used a sony clip on headphones for around a bit over a year.

One day, a friend of mine had gotten the Bose OE and brought it to school. Back then, I was a lurker of Head-fi, and had read a lot of bashing toward Bose products. I read a lot of bashing on other sites as well, and I was quite curious on how they sound. Afterall, Cnet gave them a good review (I used to listen to Cnet reviews..... I'm quite ashamed that I used to do so...) This was my chance to take a listen.

I listened to about 5 different songs, and compared them side by side with my PortaPros. Perhaps because it was my ears not being used to the sound the Bose phones produced, but I really thought the sound was completely "muffled". The moment I turned the music on, I was really unimpressed. I can hear a "thump" of bass, but I thought to myself, where's the rest of the sound? Compared to other aspects of its SQ, bass was standing out the most. Every song I've tried, I actually thought my PortaPros were better. I gave it a few more listens with lots of other songs. Same results.

Realizing that most of the bashers were quite true, I couldn't really say they were good to my friends. Afterall, I thought they wanted my opinion. The funny thing was, my friends kept telling me how amazing they were sounding. I told them to try on mine, and they all said, "His is wayyyyyyy better. You're just saying that, because you can't afford'em".

To this day, my opinion hasn't changed after listening to them almost daily for a while. How they think Bose OE sounds amazing, is something I'll never understand.
post #12 of 140
Thanks for the review. Your description of the OE's sound very much matches mine - very dark, and what little midrange and treble those headphones reproduce is grainy and woolly. They definitely out-fart even the Sony MDR-V700DJ in their grossly distorted bass.

I strongly feel that the OE's would likely (if not definitely) frustrate even fans of fart-cannon bass sound with their decidedly unbalanced sound signature.
post #13 of 140
Thanks for reviewing the Bose.

The thing about Bose is that they arn't "bad", just that there are better things out there for the price you pay for the Bose. I have a pair of QuietComfort 2's that I use for Airplane trips and whatnot. The sound is really dark, overpowered by Bass, with highly recessed or muffled highs/mids. My opinion pretty much mirrors the original posters. But since the Bose headphones were free, I'm not complaining. I can only express grief for my companies choice of product to reward a 5 year anniversary....
post #14 of 140
a lot of regular consumers who do not know as much about audio equate a lot of bass as good sound. (kind of like those people who drive around in their cars with 10 subwoofers in their trunk on max volume)

also, i think there may be a placebo effect because the bose's are so expensive. you trick yourself into thinking they sound good just to justify the high price you paid for them.
post #15 of 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by EraserXIV View Post
a lot of regular consumers who do not know as much about audio equate a lot of bass as good sound. (kind of like those people who drive around in their cars with 10 subwoofers in their trunk on max volume)
And I have listened to those cars' systems personally. At least they reproduce some useful midrange and treble response in addition to that "fart-cannon" bass. The Bose OE's midrange and treble response isn't nearly strong enough to redeem it.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Pictorial Review: Bose On-Ear