Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › REVIEW: WESTONE 3, the ULTIMATE UNIVERSAL IEM vs everything else - AKA W3 Appreciation Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

REVIEW: WESTONE 3, the ULTIMATE UNIVERSAL IEM vs everything else - AKA W3 Appreciation Thread - Page 20

post #286 of 2105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hooran View Post
Bleh... only one pair of the included tips provide a good seal... and they hurt my ears cause the tips are a bit too big for my ears. Unless I can find some nice non-Westone, but W3 compatible tips, I have a feeling my W3s will be on sale soon :/
Try the small or medium Shure olives. The small/medium Complys no good? Or try the flange reduction process (trim off the first and/or second flange, and reduce the stem). The instructions for modding the tri-flange are with the paperwork.
post #287 of 2105
I'd really, really like to use Shure's olive tips, if they sound good, with the Westone 3. I know the treble isn't as "there" as it is with other non-foam tips, but the comfort and ease of insertion is crazy good. Maybe using those tips will even bring the vocals to be a little more forward (I keep hearing about vocals sounding distant with the Westone 3 compared to something like the SE530. Interesting....).
post #288 of 2105
but but, the shure olive tips have really small holes, the w3 has the same "stem" or throttle? tube? out from the casing? or you need to mod the olives?
post #289 of 2105
No, the olives fit fine. Hole is not too small.
post #290 of 2105
Isn't the stem on the Westone 3 shorter than the Shure? Not that it makes that much of a difference: Just a different design. Although it probably allows you to put the phone deeper in your ear so it's more flush.
post #291 of 2105
Ok after reading all your comments, I have finally decided to pull the trigger.
post #292 of 2105
Got mine today. Big props to mike at freq city.

Sound is instantly and obviously better than my SE530's. Will have more in depth stuff to say later if anyone is interested.
post #293 of 2105
Of course we're interested! The more impressions there are the more people considering them will get a concrete idea of the sound they present. So, post it when you know what you're hearing.
post #294 of 2105
How do I delete this post?
post #295 of 2105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jensen View Post
Got mine today. Big props to mike at freq city.

Sound is instantly and obviously better than my SE530's. Will have more in depth stuff to say later if anyone is interested.
Me too but still waiting on the order to arrive; how long did it take to arrive?
post #296 of 2105
cannot wait for my tf10 vs. westone 3 comparison when I get mine soon
post #297 of 2105
Sorry to distract but i think TF10Pro sound signature changed since UE upgrade with new cable and now TF10Pro sound more like refind version of sf5pro(i really liked TF10Pro with orignal cable).
post #298 of 2105
well I have not hear super fi's but I find my newish trips to not be that bright pretty balanced but that is imo with foam tips
post #299 of 2105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beardy View Post
Me too but still waiting on the order to arrive; how long did it take to arrive?
I used express shipping so one day.
post #300 of 2105
Ok, first let me start off with the weaknesses as perceived by an SE530 owner.

The Shure has the advantage in mids, I wouldn't call the Westone mids recessed, I would just say that the se530's are exaggerated (in a good way). This makes male vocals sound a bit more foward and pleasant in the Shures. The Shures also have a bigger and wider soundstage about them. However, I think this comes at the cost of accuracy and detail.

Now onto the good. Overrall the Westone 3 is the superior IEM. All the INSTRUMENTS sound better and more realistic in the W3. The bass is also better; more defined, pops harder, and quakes less compared to the SE530. There is higher accuracy in every other part of the sound spectrum as well; the highs are much better, I can hear the pick hitting the string whereas on the Shure I could only hear the string itself.

This extra accuracy does have some downsides though. I have experienced a bit of sibiliance for the first time in certain songs. Also, I find these much more fatiguing than the Shures. I chalk it up to the better highs.

The comfort is superior to the Shure's, which I had zero complaints with. It's not that the earpiece itself is nicer, but the lack of the Shure's thicker/heavier cable hanging from your ears makes them disappear on you. Speaking of the cable, this thing is awesome. It is soft, very bendable, thin, light, and seemingly durable. The thin and bendable qualities also make it so you don't have to worry about it ever cracking where it folds over your ear. While my Shure's did not have this problem, I could definitely see how it might occur given enough time.

Overrall, the only small downgrade from what I had is the mids, but it's a small price to pay for the better everything else.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › REVIEW: WESTONE 3, the ULTIMATE UNIVERSAL IEM vs everything else - AKA W3 Appreciation Thread