Quote:
Originally Posted by fzman 
if the problem is an arm-cart mismatch, which it seems to be, then the resonant frequency of the combo is probably right in the range of footfalls and tappings, etc, so the table is effectively an amplifier of those events-- making it extra sensitive to such things. -- have you tried to use a test record to see where the resonance is?
|
A good suspended subchassis should have much better shock resistance than a constrained layer plinth like the Technics. I can gently tap on the edge of my Thorens while it's playing with no audible effects.
It is a budget deck but it's pretty well made so there is no reason why the suspended subchassis shouldn't work as well as this but they do require more careful set-up and tweaking than a non-suspended design.
So you should maybe also look at the springs on the Pioneer because these should be adjustable. Essentially when you push down on the spindle you want the top plate to bounce evenly up and down and not wobble from side to side.
Getting it to do this and be level at the same time is the trick. Lighter and heavier springs and the amount of damping applied (usually in the form of a bit of foam shoved into the springs) will change the Q (resonance frequency of the supsension) which obviously can interfere with the stylus too.
So you can maybe experiment quite cheaply with changing the springs for heavier or lighter gauge springs which you should find in a large hardware store as they can sag with age.
The fact that your stylus CAN jump perfectly in and out of the same groove though, suggests to me that the suspension must be well levelled and the arm bias set correctly as this is actually quite a feat.
So I reckon it's all quite finely balanced and the arm is simply of too high a mass to work with the springy suspension on the cart which is being exited unduly by the suspension on the deck when it absorbs a knock and bouncing. A less springy cantilever tracking heavier should be under better control.