I wanted to add a quick update, I am at around the 70 hour break in point with the Valab. I did a quick comparison between the Valab and the Paradisea last night, not very scientific but these are my results anyway.
First of all let me say that the dacs sound quite different at this stage. The Valab has developed a thinner, leaner sound, it is very fast with very good dynamics, the Valab is also brighter with some hash, minor but still there compared to the Paradisea. The Paradisea is warmer more fleshed out than the Valab, at this point I must say that the Paradisea is more refined. The 2 dacs have a different set of attributes, the Valab is a cleaner/leaner and more transparant sound with more air which could be a function of the leaness, the paradisea is warmer, more coherent and more musical. A limiting factor with the Paradisea could be the tube, I have the Russian and the stock GE tubes, I feel the Russian is better but still not highly rated according to MHDT's rating of tubes, a better tube may change my observations. Right now I give the nod to the Paradisea but with more break in with the Valab it may change my opinion. The Valab is still a great bargain and to even be comparing a dac which costs almost 4 times that of the Valab speaks very highly of this little dac. One user of the Gigalab dac which is very similar to the Valab noted that the Gigalab needs a good break in and warms up after 100-150 hours of use, we shall see if the Valab does the same!
Phill