New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Blu-Ray is dead? - Page 3

post #31 of 218
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Viewing distance is huge factor, mostly people keep their computer screens closer so improvement is much more prominent. Likewise, watching an HDTV (depending on the size/res) from really far away will make the differences appear minimal.
__________________
Very true. When you sit close to a big screen HDTV, the detail, combined with the size impact, blows a computer screen out of the water. IMO
post #32 of 218
"Second, the advent of low cost up-sampling DVD players dramatically cut the video quality advantage of Blu-ray DVDs. Suddenly, for $100, your average consumer can put good video on their HDTV using standard DVDs. When Blu-ray got started no one dreamed this would happen."

I think he's the one smoking dope. Srsly.

Threre are multiple reasons blu-ray isn't a mass-market product yet. But first and foremost it's because it's too expensive compared to DVDs or going to the cinema.
post #33 of 218
Really bad analogies ahead.

Online video=Mp3
DVD=CD
BluRay=SACD

Don't bet against convenience. For the average user the "good enough"
bar is pretty low.
post #34 of 218
frankly, i don't really have more spare money to spend on blu-ray dvd. one hobby is more than enough. plus i really don't think the difference is large enough for the extra cash. i too have good eyes too. i can still read road sign from far and i used to play goalie and able to hit any fastball(curveball, not so much).
post #35 of 218
For me, DVD is good enough for the time being, even tough I've seen Blue ray discs in action and they look better than standard DVD's. DVD is cheaper, video quality is great enough, and most importantly it already has an immense library of movies, TV shows, and music concerts... even more than VHS when DVD was entering the scene.
post #36 of 218
It's funny that this subject came up... I have a friend that works for JVC, and over the weekend, the subject of Blu-Ray came up. Here's the straight dope from an industry professional:

Blu-Ray is really not doing well. The only people with Blu-Ray players are PS3 owners, and they didn't buy the PS3 for Blu-Ray, it just happened to come with the package. Nobody is buying stand-alone players regardless of price drops. Some of the PS3 owners are purchasing Blu-Ray discs, but it's not enough to make the format a success.

The moral of the story, according to a guy who's been in the industry for a decade or two, is that Americans don't go for quality when it comes to audio/video. He says it is amazing to see the difference between JVC America and JVC Japan's products. For example, when JVC brought their top-tier headphones to the JVC America office, they were unable to convince anyone in the US to distribute them. It was considered to be a mega-niche. You have to go through JVC Japan to get them. JVC America considers their $100 stuff to be top-of-the-line.

By the way, anyone who can't tell the difference between up-sampled and high-definition needs a new eye doctor.
post #37 of 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbriant View Post
Very true. When you sit close to a big screen HDTV, the detail, combined with the size impact, blows a computer screen out of the water. IMO
funny, i find it the complete opposite lol
post #38 of 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by mape00 View Post
"Second, the advent of low cost up-sampling DVD players dramatically cut the video quality advantage of Blu-ray DVDs. Suddenly, for $100, your average consumer can put good video on their HDTV using standard DVDs. When Blu-ray got started no one dreamed this would happen."

I think he's the one smoking dope. Srsly.

Threre are multiple reasons blu-ray isn't a mass-market product yet. But first and foremost it's because it's too expensive compared to DVDs or going to the cinema.
I think you've never seen an early fixed pixel HD display connected to a consumer level DVD player of the time. It often looked terrible enough to force a quick return of the fixed pixel TV in favor of a CRT. It wasn't until the introduction of high quality scalers and deinterlacers into the consumer market that fixed pixel displays finally looked decent with DVDs.

If BluRay had that kind of competition now, it would be an unqualified success. Now, properly deinterlaced and upscaled DVD looks good enough at average viewing distance with most material that BluRay's quality edge is greatly blunted.
post #39 of 218
Here are some of my thoughts:

1) I own a PS3 and 3 Blu-ray discs.
2) I don't yet own an HDTV but was eying one for my wife as a Christmas gift
3) I own a 30" Dell monitor and a 24" Dell monitor. Both are way beyond 1080p. Regular DVD's look like CRAP on these monitors. Blu-ray discs? Spectacular. PS3 + Dell monitors at max PS3 res + Blu-ray = sublime.

HDTV's in Ottawa anyway, are FLYING off the shelves. My city is a bit of an odd microcosm. We aren't hit as hard financially as many other major cities in North America because we are a major government town. We have the most lawyers and politicians per capita outside of Washington DC. We have the second most PhD's per capita in the world, second only to San Jose and we have the most degreed people in the world. It seems that a combination of the above and the fact that we are the Silicon Valley of the North means that the citizens here can continually afford toys. HDTVs are among them. Video game systems another. PS3s sold very well here and I think many purchased HDTVs to go along with them. Blu-ray discs at our local Best Buy and Future Shops are hard to keep in stock and the prices are INCREDIBLE!

2 disc sets with 4 films with no extras = $20. These are great package deals with A list actors and top 100 films. We have complete tv seasons for 20-30/season, the same or cheaper than the DVD counter-parts. First week release prices of Iron Man for instance? $4 more than the DVD.

The prices are very competitive and the extra resolution worth it to most around here it seems. Certainly our little 1 million people town isn't the world market but it is a good indicator that a strong economy and an educated population can and will buy the good stuff.

I'm not an obsessive videophile at all. I barely watch tv let alone movies so I'm not overly concerned with the technology overall, but there are films I want released (LOTR, Star Wars etc.) and that I'm willing to buy and replace my DVDs of only a handful of years old. Still, the quality seems to be quite a bit better in terms of gains/dollar than SACD or DVD-A was vs. RBCD. Instead of going SACD or DVD-A (until I got the PS3), I went vinyl because I think LP's generally sound better than SACD or DVD-A and significantly better than RBCD. But with video, no way analogue is a win win there. Laserdisc died, VHS was awful and Beta had no releases (much like Laserdisc). DVD was an incredible value and Blu-ray is nearly as perfect a 2D image can get. Any new revolution in video will come in 3D display technology. Blu-ray I believe will be the end of optical formats unless 3D hits the shelves. Can videophiles keep the format alive? If we look at laserdisc, the answer is no. But then, DVD was so much better than laserdisc that it isn't a fair metric to use. Blu-ray provides more gain over DVD than DVD had over laserdisc (though less than DVD had over VHS).

Regarding this article...too much hyperbole in my opinion. LCD and Plasma tv's are incredibly cheap for massive displays. <$1000 for 42" name brand 120 Hz units. Incredible! <$2k for 46" and around $2k for 52" units! These are prices I saw in the flyer for local shoppes just yesterday! Sony Bravias! This is with the CAD falling to 75% of the USD in a month when we were essentially at par! I can't imagine what amazing deals one could find online in the US this Christmas. At those prices, with a great amount of PS3s worldwide and a decent amount of Blu-ray players, the Blu-ray discs will move and by next year, make a huge dent in DVD sales.
post #40 of 218
For people saying "the image quality is not that much better than upscaled dvd" there are different tiers of blu-ray. It starts with tier 0-reference and goes down from there. Some of the lower tiers are actually considered "barely better than vhs" these are the very old ones. If you watch any tier 0 or tier 1, you will see the true potential of bluray.
The New PQ Tier thread for Blu-Ray - AVS Forum

the best one i've seen in bluray is ironman which came out last month.
post #41 of 218
I sense that the next paradigm shift in video replay is not to some physical format like blu-ray, its to video on-demand via cable or the web simply because convenience trumps quality any day for the masses. If you dig deep enough you will probably find that most consumers shifted to dvd from vhs largely due to convenience. Yes, the consumer will buy into massive hdtv screens for their living rooms but they will be watching downloaded programs or programs stored on some hard drive and not on some disc, irregardless of the improved quality.
post #42 of 218
Thread Starter 
Quote:
If you dig deep enough you will probably find that most consumers shifted to dvd from vhs largely due to convenience.
...and a pre-established acceptance/familiarity/comfort level with CDs.
post #43 of 218
Digital Downloads > *

with junk like Netflix HD on Demand Blu-Ray will be for data stuffs and for video people.
post #44 of 218
Upscaled pictures look really good, but only when you have a very good transfer, otherwise the results are bad, even from 10ft away.

Bluray content needs to drop down to DVD prices, they can't charge you $10 more because there's $10 more definition in the picture!

So many titles on that tier0 list are 100% CGI, it doesn't take rocket science to use 100% digital imagery (not a digital or film capture of physical light) and turn it into a perfect 'transfer' because there isn't anything TO transfer. Maybe film titles with perfect transfers can charge $30, but not the rest.
post #45 of 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by earwicker7 View Post
Blu-Ray is really not doing well. The only people with Blu-Ray players are PS3 owners, and they didn't buy the PS3 for Blu-Ray, it just happened to come with the package. Nobody is buying stand-alone players regardless of price drops. Some of the PS3 owners are purchasing Blu-Ray discs, but it's not enough to make the format a success.
your "industry professional" clearly does not know what he is talking about
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home