Quote:
Originally Posted by KB 
Ummm did you read post #22? where this was addressed?
I discussed all this with Ti many months ago and everything was approved. I told him when I approached him about doing this that I would be sending people to his site and let it be know that the amp was a mini3 board etc... Moreover not only do I say it is Ti's AMB.or design I included a link to his site and encouraged those willing to try making one for themselves, so if that is not giving "credit where credit is due" then I do not know what else one can do. ?? I am not changing anything, nada, have no regrets and am totally excited about having this fantastic product to offer...
|
yes, i did read all the posts before making mine. i made no claims about your mods or your intentions, and stated so up front. my concerns were stated matter-of-factly and i thought, diplomatically. i was also careful to use the term "
unwitting" when describing the potential customers who might be mislead, which seems like a sensible enough notion.
as for the naming of the amp, i expressed my opinion, hence the terms "
to me," "
personally," and "
imho." of course , you were under no obligation to take my suggestion, as was anybody else. it was merely my opinion, and i stand by it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KB 
I certainly never want any controversy over all this. The name is confusing, I will yield after this first run and turn Double M3 to Double Mini3. I hope this all moves on to a more constructive thread and we can get back to talking about audio qualities very very soon...
|
i truly applaud your decision and think it it is the right one. kudos to you. i think the Mini^3 is a great and underrated portable amp, and if you can get it into more hands, all the better. again, this is just my opinion and nothing more.