I know "Gain Setting" is to change gain in accordance with impedance of IEMs or cans. Well, my questions is... is there SQ difference between "Gain High" and "Gain Low" setting? I mean, "Gain High & Volume Low" vs "Gain Low & Volume High" with the same IEM.
Join Now
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
When I listened to the sound for the 1st time, I was hit by it. I was punched by the not-punchy-bass. I was hoping it would offer much better bass response than SE315.. equals to Klipsch Image...
-
Synopsis: The Aurisonics AS-1b is a very nice custom-fit monitor with a sound tuned for the needs of professional musicians performing on stage. It gives the listener a mid-centric sound that...
-
HiFiMAN HE400 By now I think most of us are familiar with the history behind the HiFiMAN HE-series headphones. What started with a single model has grown into a full...
-
I was in Japan and was looking at headphones to buy. I had a cheap budget of about 4000 yen or circa $40. I bought this headphone because it was on sale for $30 and was very good looking. It was...
-
Simply put, these headphones are one the best values in the audio world. They've praised time after time, and I now know why. These are my 2nd pair of quality grade headphones (after the V6),...
Head-Fi Sponsors
Drop by and thank our partners for helping keep the lights on at Head-Fi!
Can "Gain Setting" change SQ?
post #2 of 22
9/14/08 at 3:04am
That's a great question.
I'm new to this but I'll share my experience. I have been using my Corda 2 Move for a while now with my iPod through ALO LOD to my Atrio m5s. It has always been on "High Gain" and this past weekend I decided to switch it to "Low Gain" to see what would happen.
One huge benefit is greater volume control. I no longer have to worry about tweaking the knob too much or too little since there's a wider range now. (Knob used to sit at 9 o'clock and now it's closer to 12). The other is that the bass has seemed to become more well defined. It could be just me but the past few days I've noticed cleaner, punchy bass coming from my Atrios.
Could it be that, since the volume knob is now less sensitive, I'm using a volume level that I couldn't really 'get to' before? Possibly. But I'm definitely not going back to "High Gain", that's for sure!
Scott
I'm new to this but I'll share my experience. I have been using my Corda 2 Move for a while now with my iPod through ALO LOD to my Atrio m5s. It has always been on "High Gain" and this past weekend I decided to switch it to "Low Gain" to see what would happen.
One huge benefit is greater volume control. I no longer have to worry about tweaking the knob too much or too little since there's a wider range now. (Knob used to sit at 9 o'clock and now it's closer to 12). The other is that the bass has seemed to become more well defined. It could be just me but the past few days I've noticed cleaner, punchy bass coming from my Atrios.
Could it be that, since the volume knob is now less sensitive, I'm using a volume level that I couldn't really 'get to' before? Possibly. But I'm definitely not going back to "High Gain", that's for sure!
Scott
post #3 of 22
9/14/08 at 12:25pm
- mrarroyo
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 19,113 Posts. Joined 7/2005
- Location: Miami Beach, Florida U.S.A.
- Select All Posts By This User
This has been discussed before with no clear cut answer. Partly because the testers did not use dB meter to match volumes accurately.
I would argue that if you match the volumes you will find that the sound is the same, provided you can get the same level in low vs high gain settings.
I would argue that if you match the volumes you will find that the sound is the same, provided you can get the same level in low vs high gain settings.

post #4 of 22
9/14/08 at 12:46pm
- Nocturnal310
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 3,559 Posts. Joined 4/2008
- Location: Singapore
- Select All Posts By This User
I am also worried...i think it affects the Dynamic Range. u no longer feel the punch.
I keep it to 80%...90% causes distortion in iTunes
I keep it to 80%...90% causes distortion in iTunes
post #5 of 22
9/14/08 at 10:29pm
- mrarroyo
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 19,113 Posts. Joined 7/2005
- Location: Miami Beach, Florida U.S.A.
- Select All Posts By This User
Nocturnal310, what do you keep at 80%-90%? Hopefully not the volume in iTunes. I say so because if you lower the ouput volume in iTunes (in a PC) you do not get bit perfect. At least that is what I have been told.
post #6 of 22
9/14/08 at 10:40pm
- Usagi
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 1,473 Posts. Joined 8/2004
- Location: Texas
- Select All Posts By This User
My studies with the Ray Samuels' Predator indicated that there were changes in SQ with gain changes.
post #7 of 22
11/8/08 at 7:13pm
- Catharsis
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 556 Posts. Joined 7/2008
- Location: Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Select All Posts By This User
What changes do you speak of sir?
I really really want to know
I really really want to know

post #8 of 22
11/8/08 at 7:54pm
- wuwhere
- Trader Feedback: +4
-
- offline
- 13,003 Posts. Joined 7/2008
- Location: Under A Rock
- Select All Posts By This User
There would probably be if the amp changes from class A to class AB.
post #9 of 22
11/8/08 at 8:52pm
Many times, folks think a change in volume relates to a change in SQ. This is false. Gain should not affect SQ, only the amount that you need to move the volume knob. Gain is supposed to match the impedance of your headphones to the amp, transparently. So, I would agree with mrarroyo's previous comments.
post #10 of 22
11/8/08 at 11:00pm
- mrarroyo
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 19,113 Posts. Joined 7/2005
- Location: Miami Beach, Florida U.S.A.
- Select All Posts By This User
Lately I have had conversations w/amp builders and they believe that the sound changes slightly when the gain switch is used. I have not been able to detect a difference. Maybe others have.
post #11 of 22
11/8/08 at 11:12pm
- wuwhere
- Trader Feedback: +4
-
- offline
- 13,003 Posts. Joined 7/2008
- Location: Under A Rock
- Select All Posts By This User
I would think that there would be some. At a higher gain, the amp would be consuming more current from the power supply. But this would be a design decision by the designer/manufacturer.
post #12 of 22
11/9/08 at 1:44am
- isao2k8
- Trader Feedback: +2
-
- offline
- 193 Posts. Joined 6/2008
- Location: Tokyo, Japan
- Select All Posts By This User
I don't know why, but obviously my SR-71A shines particularly with MED gain. With LOW gain, trebles and mids are a little muffled.
post #13 of 22
11/9/08 at 1:55am
- hockeyb213
- Trader Feedback: 0
- BANNED: BAD TRADER
-
- offline
- 2,976 Posts. Joined 6/2008
- Location: Long Island, N.Y
- Select All Posts By This User
wait isao are you using your blackbird with iem's or large cans at medium gain? I am curious because I have a sr-71a also and right now I am using it with iems so just curious
post #14 of 22
11/9/08 at 2:21am
I have owned these iBasso headphone amplifiers: T2, P2, D1, D2 Boa/Viper and P3. Times and again, high gain setting has provided better dynamic range than low gain setting.
My ideal gain feature will be automatic gain control (AGC), where the amplifier adjust gain constantly based on amplitude of input signal (feedback loop is necessary). Thus regardless of different signal amplitudes from different audio input sources, output amplitude will be maintained the same and dynamic range maximized without clipping once output volume control has been set. The AGC control avoids clipping of output signal when input amplitude is too high. Setting of output volume control to match headphone characteristic is just a matter of set-and-forget.
Of course such AGC implementatio should not compromise dynamic range and sound quality at all and should not raise cost drastically. Perhaps AGC has already been implemented on chip in some opamp designs. AGC is not a new concept at all, I learned about it some years ago when I was working on read amplifier circuit of hard drive. Since air gap between magnetic head and spinning disc surface vary constantly, AGC is used to maintain level of raw analog read signal before digital decoding can be done on incoming raw bit stream (analog level of digital signal affects digital decoding to certain extent).
My ideal gain feature will be automatic gain control (AGC), where the amplifier adjust gain constantly based on amplitude of input signal (feedback loop is necessary). Thus regardless of different signal amplitudes from different audio input sources, output amplitude will be maintained the same and dynamic range maximized without clipping once output volume control has been set. The AGC control avoids clipping of output signal when input amplitude is too high. Setting of output volume control to match headphone characteristic is just a matter of set-and-forget.
Of course such AGC implementatio should not compromise dynamic range and sound quality at all and should not raise cost drastically. Perhaps AGC has already been implemented on chip in some opamp designs. AGC is not a new concept at all, I learned about it some years ago when I was working on read amplifier circuit of hard drive. Since air gap between magnetic head and spinning disc surface vary constantly, AGC is used to maintain level of raw analog read signal before digital decoding can be done on incoming raw bit stream (analog level of digital signal affects digital decoding to certain extent).
post #15 of 22
11/9/08 at 2:34am
- isao2k8
- Trader Feedback: +2
-
- offline
- 193 Posts. Joined 6/2008
- Location: Tokyo, Japan
- Select All Posts By This User
With sensitive IEMs (LiveWires T1). Noise floor on MED is a little bigger than on LOW but in terms of SQ I prefer MED.
Return Home
Back to Forum: Portable Headphone Amps
- Can "Gain Setting" change SQ?
Currently, there are 2424 Active Users
(560 Members and 1864 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › Beats vs alternatives 54 seconds ago
- › Denon Officially Announces Its New Headphones! 58 seconds ago
- › Sennheiser HD 700: Officially Unveiled at CES 2012! 2 minutes ago
- › Asus BDS-700, oppo on a budget? 2 minutes ago
- › VSONIC GR07 Impressions & Appreciation Thread 4 minutes ago
- › Tube/Hybrid amp for Pro900 4 minutes ago
- › Review: Fischer Audio FA-003 - a neutral champ! 4 minutes ago
- › Amp recommendations for Audeze LCD-2 6 minutes ago
- › Foobar2000 Dolby Headphone config - Comment & discuss! 6 minutes ago
- › Help needed to upgrade the capacitor in OTL tube amp 6 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Shure SE535LTD RED by sue4
- › Aurisonics AS-1b by Kunlun
- › HiFiMAN HE-400 by project86
- › Pioneer SE MJ31 by jojexy
- › Grado SR60i Headphones by Smiling Jack
- › Final Audio Design Adagio V by SpringBiscuit
- › Matrix Quattro Dac by shipsupt
- › Sennheiser HD 800 Headphones by DannyRox23
- › Bose OE2i Audio Headphones - White by emceelokey
- › Beyer Dynamic DT 770 Premium 600 OHM Headphones by kungmarten
View: More Reviews
New Articles
- › Comparing headphones: Sennheiser's HD... by Windsor
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
View: New Articles | All Articles
Home | Head Gear | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map





