Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
When I listened to the sound for the 1st time, I was hit by it. I was punched by the not-punchy-bass. I was hoping it would offer much better bass response than SE315.. equals to Klipsch Image...
-
Synopsis: The Aurisonics AS-1b is a very nice custom-fit monitor with a sound tuned for the needs of professional musicians performing on stage. It gives the listener a mid-centric sound that...
-
HiFiMAN HE400 By now I think most of us are familiar with the history behind the HiFiMAN HE-series headphones. What started with a single model has grown into a full...
-
I was in Japan and was looking at headphones to buy. I had a cheap budget of about 4000 yen or circa $40. I bought this headphone because it was on sale for $30 and was very good looking. It was...
-
Simply put, these headphones are one the best values in the audio world. They've praised time after time, and I now know why. These are my 2nd pair of quality grade headphones (after the V6),...
Head-Fi Sponsors
Google's new browser, Chrome - Page 14
- DocHamm
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 941 Posts. Joined 3/2007
- Location: Cincinnati
- Select All Posts By This User

- DrBenway
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 2,154 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Location: Lenox Hill (59th to 72nd, Central Park to East River)
- Select All Posts By This User
|
I'm not a huge IE fan, especially because of it's inherent bugs, but I finally got tired of installing new software till my machine exploded.
|
I downloaded and tried the beta of Chrome, and I thought it was pretty good. But there was no "wow" factor for me. The thought of spending the time necessary to learn it as well as I've learned IE was daunting.
And, correct me if I'm wrong, there's still no RSS reader built in...?
- SiriuslyCold
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 881 Posts. Joined 11/2004
- Location: Malaysia
- Select All Posts By This User
- krmathis
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Head-Fi's Most Prolific Poster
-
- offline
- 35,112 Posts. Joined 1/2004
- Location: Oslo, Norway
- Select All Posts By This User
- progo
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 1,587 Posts. Joined 10/2007
- Location: Funland
- Select All Posts By This User


- krmathis
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Head-Fi's Most Prolific Poster
-
- offline
- 35,112 Posts. Joined 1/2004
- Location: Oslo, Norway
- Select All Posts By This User
The Beta for Mac OS X is finally here, 15 months after the MS Windows version made its appearance. About time!
Google Chrome - Download a new browser
- krmathis
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Head-Fi's Most Prolific Poster
-
- offline
- 35,112 Posts. Joined 1/2004
- Location: Oslo, Norway
- Select All Posts By This User
Google Chrome for Mac does not feel like it is ready for the masses. No bookmark manager, cookie manager or extension support. All present in the beta version for GNU/Linux which also released today, and of course the MS Windows release version.
After all these months (September 2nd. 2008 -> December 8th. 2009) I certainly expected features on par with the MS Windows one...
It is free though, so probably have no right to complain.

* Uninstalled *
- donovansmith
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 2,957 Posts. Joined 8/2002
- Location: Denver, CO USA
- Select All Posts By This User
Chrome, even in its current state, is still more Mac-like than Firefox. Firefox is a mess on OS X. They still have yet to make something as simple as the zoom button work like it should

- SiriuslyCold
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 881 Posts. Joined 11/2004
- Location: Malaysia
- Select All Posts By This User
- Welly Wu
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 5,212 Posts. Joined 5/2003
- Location: West Orange, New Jersey 07052-5526
- Select All Posts By This User
I am updating this thread by more than one year later. I am running Google Chrome 8.x stable version and it is by far the simplest web browser that I have ever used. It is one of the fastest on the market and Google keeps updating and upgrading their Chromium project every several weeks with new features and better performance. Compared to Mozilla Firefox 4.x beta 7 and Windows Internet Explorer 9 Beta, Chrome still beats them both for security, stability, and speed especially if you turn on GPU hardware acceleration and WebGL in about:flags. The only thing that still needs development is GPU hardware acceleration especially for HTML5, SVG, and CSS3 standards; I find Windows Internet Explorer 9 Beta to be much faster at the cost of bugs which force me to use compatibility mode on some of my favorite websites. Google stated that its Canary build should see more work put into enhancing GPU hardware acceleration and the new code base to support it fully should be mature by version 12 or 13 in the future. I have only installed the Google Chrome theme and the GMail application so far.
The other thing that sucks about Google Chrome is that it is not compatible with Sirius XM Satellite Radio. I am a subscriber and I need to use Windows Internet Explorer 8 to stream its premium content to my ASUS N61JV-X2 notebook PC because the software developers and engineers coded it to work exclusively with that browser. Mozilla Firefox does not work either. This is not Google's fault either.
Since I only have a 1366 X 768 pixel resolution LED screen, Chrome maximizes the display area for websites which I find to be critical to an optimal web experience. Windows Internet Explorer 9 Beta comes close, but it takes up an extra two lines of resolution in windowed mode compared to Chrome. A major problem with it is that I can only install and run the 64 bit version of 8 or 9 Beta; the 32 bit version that has the new Chakra engine is unavailable to me since I run Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit so I cannot take advantage of the performance improvements. Adobe Flash Square ActiveX for 64 bit is broken in IE 9 Beta and I am unable to play Adobe Flash movies. Microsoft has not even acknowledged these problems thus far on their Facebook page or their blog.
Chrome does not suffer from the switching problem with the new Huddler system when composing threads or replies thanks to the hard work of the administrators here at the forums.
Thanks.
- Google's new browser, Chrome
Recent Discussions
- › Help finding a portable AMP and DAC, 300-650$ Paired with... 24 seconds ago
- › Feedback for Justin's Headphone Modding (jschristian44) 27 seconds ago
- › [Review] Impressions of the Sony EX1000 versus the FX700, GR10 and... 29 seconds ago
- › Denon Officially Announces Its New Headphones! 30 seconds ago
- › Looking for bassy headset under $200 with good soundstage 1 minute ago
- › Anyone have experience with the new "Pro-ject Head Box S"? 3 minutes ago
- › HRT HeadStreamer: WASAPI woes in FooBar 6 minutes ago
- › bad trader!! crap, i need help!!! 7 minutes ago
- › Practical Devices XM6 AMP/DAC like new one month old! 9 minutes ago
- › You know you're an audiophile when... 10 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Shure SE535LTD RED by sue4
- › Aurisonics AS-1b by Kunlun
- › HiFiMAN HE-400 by project86
- › Pioneer SE MJ31 by jojexy
- › Grado SR60i Headphones by Smiling Jack
- › Final Audio Design Adagio V by SpringBiscuit
- › Matrix Quattro Dac by shipsupt
- › Sennheiser HD 800 Headphones by DannyRox23
- › Bose OE2i Audio Headphones - White by emceelokey
- › Beyer Dynamic DT 770 Premium 600 OHM Headphones by kungmarten
New Articles
- › Comparing headphones: Sennheiser's HD... by Windsor
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map






