Quote:
|
So true, Zanth.
I remember a thread on here a year or so ago where a poster was asking what amp he should upgrade to with his RS-1s. Naturally, everyone asked him what kind of music he listened to. He listed every one of his albums. All five of them. That doesn't represent the bulk of us here, of course, but it illustrates a problem -- many are putting the playback before the play. I understand that new members here are continually looking for gear advice, because on a gear forum the system comes first, but I'm always disappointed that more senior members can't be found in the music forum. I would *love* for this forum to become a kind of counterpoint to Hoffman's older demo. Of course, that means I need to start posting some samples... |
I've not spent that much time on the Hoffman forums. Because of that I have problems finding information sometimes. Recently, I was looking for what the best version of Relayer is on CD. It took a couple of hours to find the answer. In some of the threads, people were talking about the codes etched into LPs next to the label.
BTW, the answer to which is the best version of Relayer is the original Atlantic release or the Rhino release, but really none are as good as the best of the LPs. The other general consensus is that Relayer is the perfect example of great music recorded badly, ie the masters aren't good.
Quote:
|
Great Idea!
I have a couple of questions, though: Are we going to be objective about this and include graphs and test results, or more subjective as in "it sounds pretty damn good to me". How are we going to define "awesome recordings"? Because some of the so-called "awesome" MFSL remasters sound like ass to me (muffled), and I sometimes (to a point) prefer a slightly hot, but more real and raw sounding original. Food for thought. |










