New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HD280 Pro or KSC75?

post #1 of 24
Thread Starter 
I know...weird comparison, right? I'm introducing a friend to audiophilia, and the choice seems to be a pair of basely used Senn HD280 Pros for US$36+ or new Koss KSC75s for US$21+. I know the 280s are closed head-bands and the 75s are open clip-ons, so the comparison is really weird. But still, which do you think she should get? She currently has and likes her CX300s. Are the 75s a significant step up? More so than the 280s? At those prices?

Edit: She listens to metal mostly.
post #2 of 24
I vote for the KSC-75's. A little biased. Sent a pair to Alex to APS to recable and Really like them.
post #3 of 24
If she listens to metal, both of those 2 bass-weak phones is going to be a step down from the CX300. The prices for the HD280 is very good, but she's better off with a K81/K518.
post #4 of 24
Thread Starter 
The K81s are beyond budget...but she's been listening to some of my headphones and wants in. Slowly. So, it's pretty much a race between the 75s and 280s. Point taken on the 81s, though.
post #5 of 24
Unfortunately, I've never heard the 280s, so I can't really compare. However, I will say I use the KSC-75s (with a headband) just about every day commuting to work and the more I use them with my Zune the more disappointed I am with their sound in comparison to my SR-60s.
post #6 of 24
Thread Starter 
Right...but these are $20 and the SR-60s are...$60? In NZ, they're US$120. Heh.
post #7 of 24
I've recommended the KSC-75 to many of my friends and several of the girls I know, including my sister and her best friend, and not one of them has been let down by them yet.
post #8 of 24
Wouldn't you think the choice comes down to something portable vs closed full size circumaural headphones?

For the price, the HD280 seems like a big bargain to me unless they are in poor condition. I like the KSC-75 as an all round budget solution.
post #9 of 24
Much as I love the 75's and would recommend them in just about every other situation, I think for $36, your friend would get a totally different audiophile listening experience with a good closed headphone for a bargain price. I think the 75's are a step up from the CX300's, but the 280's are a bit more immersive. You put those things on knowing your main activity is listening.
post #10 of 24
But the thing is, HD280 is a terrible metal can, so there's no reason why she should get it. KSC75 isn't that good of a metal can to, but at least after recabling it has a decent amount of bass.
post #11 of 24
HD280 is very revealing. it'll amplify any shortcomings in the source.
post #12 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathanjong View Post
Right...but these are $20 and the SR-60s are...$60? In NZ, they're US$120. Heh.
But many people on here have asserted that these are Grado killers, at least SR-60 killers. If you can hold them tight against your ears, the 75s sound pretty good. But using them either stock or with the headband "mod", they are pretty thin sounding.
post #13 of 24
ksc75
post #14 of 24
I LOVE the 280 pros. Haven't heard the KCS75 - would like to
post #15 of 24
i hate the hd280s. one of the few headphones that immediately was sent back to the store after the first listen. perhaps i did not give it a chance, but i think they're awful.

i do like the ksc-75 and would recommend those.

but i think there are two things to consider in this choice. one, the equipment being used. the hd280 requires an amp. it's already thin-sounding to begin with, so an amp will help a little with this. second, i don't think the hd280 are metal headphones by an means. accurate, yes, but not fun and lively. the ksc75 sounds like the proper headphone in this case. my 2cents.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav: