Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Vinyl playback issues
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Vinyl playback issues

post #1 of 55
Thread Starter 
Hello,

I am new to the forum, and have recently begun to purchase and play vinyl again after a number of years away from the form. I definitely do not consider myself an experienced audiophile, but I'm here to learn. My desires for vinyl playback are basic: minimal/normal surface noise, acceptable separation, clear/non-distorted highs and lows, audible mids, and longevity of the hardware.

I have a Technics PT-2000 turntable and had a Stanton 680 EL MKII-MP cartridge that was worn, so I replaced it with a cheaper Audio-Technica AT92E at the recommendation of the owner of my local new & used vinyl record store (he said it was a good low-end cartridge).

I have been having some serious issues with brand new vinyl that I've purchased since I've been getting back into the form the past few months. Basically, a good 40-50% of the brand new vinyl that I've purchased -- both regular and 180 gram formats -- has sounded poor when I played it. By far, the most signifcant problem has been excessive or regularly re-ocurring surface noise: by this I mean either tons of pops and crackles that are louder than the music (I can even hear the loud pops/crackles over the music on the rock/metal albums I have), or the same loud pop or crackle at regular intervals during playback (i.e., every time the record reaches a certain point in its revolution, the same loud pop or crackle occurs). A secondary problem has been distortion of the sound, especially the highs (vocals and guitar). Typically, the sound distortion problem is correlated with the records having the most amount of surface noise.

I understand that some amount of surface noise is going to occur with vinyl playback, but what bothers me is that: A. The BRAND NEW vinyl has an excessive amount of noise (when I buy something new, I expect it to sound like new), B. The problem does not happen with all of the new vinyl I have purchased (some of the new records I've purchased are quiet as a mouse), and C. Oftentimes the used and heavily played vinyl that I've purchased or had in my collection for years has less or at best an equal amount of surface noise and distortion than the brand new records.

Prior to purchasing the new records, I took the record player to a turntable specialist at a local high-end audio place to make sure my setup was good (tracking force, anti-skate, tonearm height, etc.). He fine-tuned everything, and he informed me about the plate and scale you can purchase to help aid with proper setup.

So, does anyone have any idea what the issue may be? Is it the setup, the cartridge, the turntable, or the records themselves?

I do think I should get a better quality cartridge. Does anyone have any recommendations for a good quality cartridge under $100, given my components? I know I won't be getting audiophile quality at that price, but I'd like something that is really good for the value. Something that can handle the surface noise issues, that is relatively durable, and that gives acceptable separation, non-distorted highs and lows, and audible mids.

Thanks for any help you can provide!
post #2 of 55
Have you cleaned your records? Sadly, even new ones come dirty now and then. You can wash by hand in the sink - I've had good results doing that.

My two favorite inexpensive cartridges are the Grado Black and the Shure MX97E. Both sound terrific.
post #3 of 55
It sounds to me like you're getting some bum pressings. If some records sound good and others sound bad, the problem is the record. Even a dirty record shouldn't have noise louder than the music. Take those records back to the store.

See ya
Steve
post #4 of 55
do u brush your records before each play?

[IMG]http://www.planetofsoundonline.com/newhifi/project/bru****.jpg[/IMG]

this can pick up some of the dust and junk that can settle on your records between plays.

edit: ok well the pic url seems to have a swear in it..."brush-it". let me find another pic

post #5 of 55
I think the crackling you are hearing is the static on the record. There are treatments to this which have been aluded to in the post above. However, the distortion is a problem I also have but haven't been able to pinpoint. It seems it could be several things, from the cart itself not performing, (cleaning the needle after each record is not a bad idea) to the phono stage you are using causing clipping to a bad master on the album. I would really like to know what, if anything, you manage to do to get rid of the distortion. Posting your equipment might also be a good idea.
Jason
post #6 of 55
I think the problem is that a lot of the new vinyl being pressed these days is junk.

http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f7/cla...oblems-324755/

--Jerome
post #7 of 55
jsaliga: That is a really valid point. I have not bought alot of vinyl, but my experience has been disappointing to say the least. I noticed an lp I got which was pressed in england was pristine and sounded great while all of the stuff made here in America or China, etc. has had fingerprints and other dirt problems. I don't get that. I pay thirty or forty bucks for something, it should be in great shape when I get it.
post #8 of 55
Buy vintage LPs. It's easy to find great sounding records for a buck or two a disk. At that price, if you get a bum one in a batch, it won't hurt so much to write it off.

See ya
Steve
post #9 of 55
It has gotten so bad that some companies such as Better Records are charging customers between $100 and $300 for what amounts to a record that has been play graded.

Better Records / DCC Blowout

I'm sorry, but these guys must believe that audiophiles, just like fools, are soon parted with their money. Maybe they are, but not this audiophile. It makes me sick to my stomach to think that someone out there might believe that the copy of Joe Jackson's Jumping Jive they got soaked $199 for acutally will sound any better than the copy I paid $3 for at a yard sale.

I agree with Steve. Stick with vintage vinyl and you will get a lot of pleasure and enjoyment out of it. When the prices you pay per record are low to begin with then it doesn't sting at all to toss a few if they are bad. I won't pay more than $10 for ANY record, I don't care what it is or how rare it is. $2 to $5 is my target price and puts me in my comfort zone. I am picking up a lot of 150 jazz records from someone next week for $2 per album (mostly 1950s and 1960s Verve, Roulette, and Mercury label albums). If only half of them are keepers then it will be an exceptionally worthwhile deal. It's way better to do that then to get fleeced for $200 for one album.

--Jerome
post #10 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsaliga View Post
It has gotten so bad that some companies such as Better Records are charging customers between $100 and $300 for what amounts to a new record that has been play graded.

Better Records / DCC Blowout
This just looks like some clever marketing. Original Beatles pressings can fetch those amounts and more if they are pristine but these guys are just cashing in on audiophiles with more money than sense. This kind of thing usually goes on with records which are rare until someone bootlegs them and then the record company realises there is money to be made an re-issues them.

In my experience though pressings have been much better than ever before in recent years but perhaps now that the vinyl resurgence is reaching critical mass they just can't keep up with demand and standards are slipping. Better to buy locally and return stuff that's sub par I suppose.
post #11 of 55
Just look at some of the titles they are charging an arm and a leg for:

Supertramp - Breakfast in America
Talking Heads - More Songs About Buildings and Food
Steely Dan - Pretzel Logic
Peter Gabriel - So
Brian Eno - Taking Tiger Mountain

These are by no means rare records.

And I don't agree that records are better than ever before. I will agree that there are some remasters on vinyl that are very much worth having (like the Steve Hoffman remaster of ZZ Top - Tres Hombres). I'll also agree that when done right a modern pressing can sound amazing. I remember the first time I played a Classic Record 200g QUIEX-SVP vinyl record. I was stunned by the extremely low, almost non-existent, surface noise levels. But these gains are all offset by serious quality control problems, and bad record after bad record ends up in the hands of customers. So I don't see how pressing the physical media has really improved. Theoretically perhaps, but until they can get the defect rate to a reasonable level it doesn't mean much. So I think that if anything it has, to use Steve's words, devolved.

I may not have stayed with vinyl when I was in my 20s and 30s, but I grew up with it and I'm telling you that neither myself nor my music buying friends had to endure or would tolerate the sort of defect rates I have been seeing the over the past several months.

When you are faced with returning upwards of 30 to 50% of everything you buy it gets to the point where it is no longer worth the time you have to invest in play testing records and running back and forth to the store or post office to exchange defects. I am a very busy professional and have no interest whatsoever in a second career as a play tester for the audiophile vinyl labels. QA is a job that is entirely their responsibility. They owe that much to their customers.

I even had one dealer (who shall remain nameless) who told me on the phone that any standard reissue pressing can be expected to sound like crap with lots of clicks and pops. In the mid 1970s I think I was paying about $4.50 for a new LP at the local music store, and I don't ever recall feeling the need to take one back due to physical defects. I have little sympathy for the labels. If they could supply the public with high quality pressings and low defect rates during a time when vinyl was the dominant media for music distribution, then they should be able to do so now. I think they are cutting corners to control costs. The quality of the products are suffering for it -- and so are audiophiles.

--Jerome
post #12 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelglam View Post

I understand that some amount of surface noise is going to occur with vinyl playback, but what bothers me is that: A. The BRAND NEW vinyl has an excessive amount of noise (when I buy something new, I expect it to sound like new), B. The problem does not happen with all of the new vinyl I have purchased (some of the new records I've purchased are quiet as a mouse), and C. Oftentimes the used and heavily played vinyl that I've purchased or had in my collection for years has less or at best an equal amount of surface noise and distortion than the brand new records.
I tend to concur that what your experiencing is not related to your turntable/cartridge, and is a reflection of the hit and miss state of record pressing nowadays. While certain labels (like New West and Lost Highway) seem to consistently put out quality pressings, others are hit and miss.

While the trend with new releases tending to be heavy vinyl pressings is a good thing, if they are not using virgin vinyl, it is a bad trade off. I'd much rather have a thin album produced with virgin vinyl than a 180 gram pressing made from a mix of new and recycled vinyl. My fear is that as oil prices continue to go up, thus raising the price of vinyl, the quality is going to continue to go downhill. This certainly happened in the wake of the '73 oil embargo, and I think we are beginning to see a similar decline. I remember this introduced the popularity of Japanese imports being desirable in the late 70's, because although the albums tended to be thin, they were using virgin vinyl with good quality control. I still have quite a few Japanese imports from that era that are quiet as can be, even after 30 years of playback.

I know I have been shifting to buying used and cleaning them with a VPI and the results are much more satisfying. It costs less, and if there ends up being some surface noise, at least the cause is well understood (it was used after all) as opposed to the frustration of spending big bucks on a new pressing for it to sound like a 30 year old record destroyed with a worn stylus.
post #13 of 55
You state that you had the TT setup tuned prior to playing the vinyl - was that before or after you had the new cart installed?
While it doesn't mention distortion specifically, this short article may be of use (if only to familiarize one with TT adjustment basics):
Fine Tuning Your Turntable

For the record (no pun intended), my daily player [NAD 533, RB300, Elys 2, Iron Audio platter > Cambridge 640p > Cambridge 640a v.1] has never had any issue playing new LPs pressed by Classic, RTI, etc.. I clean my needle before each session with this, keep my LPs clean with a brush similar to the one posted above and a Zero-Stat. Most recently I have been playing the 180g "virgin vinyl" Blue Note reissues from Acoustic Productions (pressed at RTI), and Classic's 200g Dylan Bootleg Series, Neil Young and Norah Jones pressings. Extremely quiet, ear-blowing resolution and no distortion (except for a small bit on Jones' new LP on the grooves closest to the center). Same thing goes for most of my other LPs used or new.
So, perhaps I have been lucky?
I do agree with you Jerome, even if I haven't run into the amount of problems you have (30-50%?! I would be pretty aggravated too). I will admit - I have been astonished when receiving new LPs and finding superficial marks, dust, dirt - even a ********* footprint on a Lost Highway pressing - things that are absolutely unacceptable. QC does seem to be flaky at certain labels, however - footprints and dust aside - when it comes to just plain bad pressings, how much of this could be due to the fact that vinyl production is limited in relation to a few decades ago when it was, as you say "the dominant media for music distribution". I have no data on this, and I am not excusing the labels in question, but hypothetically, if there has always been, say a 5% reject rate in vinyl pressing, then the chance of receiving a crappy pressing is going to be much higher now with lower production rates...?

Back on topic Steelglam; maybe you could ask your local hi-fi dealer if they would allow you to audition your TT on a different set-up? Maybe the wiring in the arm is in poor condition? In my mind, there are too many variables to simply lay blame on one element; so if you can try changing as many of those variables perhaps you will find the combination that suits you. That's what I did when I was looking to replace my old cart (luckily, my local shop is owned by a very patient man!).

Sorry for the ramblings on...
post #14 of 55
For me the joy of vinyl comes in finding a record that has not been issued on CD that has music that's important to me.

For instance, I found a copy of a Count Basie record with Joe Williams called Just the Blues. This album has not been issued on CD, though the tracks do appear in a now out of print Mosaic CD limited run boxed set. I snagged this record which was pressed in 1960 for $6. Here is a clip from one of the tracks. Now it doesn't sound perfect, but it doesn't really have to. I think it sounds terrific and would take a bunch of these sorts of albums rather than deal with one more new vinyl reissue.

Count Basie Music Sample

--Jerome
post #15 of 55
Thread Starter 
I want to say thank you to everyone that responded. I guess my message really got a debate going about the quality of new vs. old vinyl.

It's really interesting to hear others speak about bad experiences with new vinyl because I originally thought that could possibly be the issue, but then I thought I was crazy for thinking that because I assumed new vinyl would be of equal or perhaps even better quality than vintage vinyl. Especially because the new "heavy" vinyl that I've purchased but have not had problems with sounds amazing.

And the more I thought about it after reading your responses, there really might be something to the idea that certain labels put out better quality new stuff. I say this because many of the problems I've had have been either with multiple albums by the same artist or albums by multiple artists on the same label. Although this doesn't fit the profile of all of the problematic records I've come across, it does apply in many cases.

Anyhow, to respond to a few specific questions/ideas people had...

Uncle Erik: Thanks for the ideas on new cartridges. Someone recommended the Grado a while back, but then I read somewhere that the Grados amplify surface noise issues, which made me shy away from it. Have you experienced this? If not, perhaps I'll check it or the Shure out. As for your question, I have cleaned my records before playing them, both the old ones and the new ones. My first thought after encountering the problem was: "dirty record." Cleaning did not solve the problem for the ones that were clearly problematic. It's funny, but I can tell almost immediately if the problem will be solved by cleaning, depending on the types of surface noise that I hear. In almost 100% of the cases of the type I described in my original message, cleaning helped reduce some of the regular surface noise you expect to hear, but not the big problems (loud re-ocurring crackles/pops/clicks at regular intervals or distortion). Now, granted, I don't use a vaccuum method to clean the records, instead relying on the old brush + solution method. But in my opinion, I should not have to drop $500-1000 on a VPI or Nitty Gritty machine just so I can get my brand new vinyl to sound like it should: BRAND NEW. That's highway robbery, in my opinion.

Bigshot: Yeah, I have taken some of the new vinyl back to the shop (on some of them, I waited too long to test listen and missed the "return by" date). But frankly, I'm getting sick of doing this, especially because the stores have been resistant to me taking stuff back and are getting sick of me. I mean, I don't care what they think, but it is a hassle to deal with. At least twice I've gotten a "well, vinyl is supposed to have pops and clicks when you play it" response from the sales rep, like I'm some kind of idiot or something. My response is: "No crap, but new vinyl is not supposed to sound like THIS!" Anyhow, I've been trying to buy vintage as much as possible, but some of the reissues or new pressings are just cheaper in price than a hundred dollar vintage one on ebay. Regardless, I hear you on the quality of vintage over new vinyl. I try to get a lot from used record shops for under $10. But for new artists/bands or rare stuff that's only recently been re-issued, finding them at said stores is highly unlikely.

WolfyWolf: My phono stage is pretty simple: I have the direct drive turntable that I purchased about 6 years ago running directly into the receiver on my hi-fi system. No separate pre-amp. I think this part of my setup is OK because the records that do not have any of the problems I originally described sound great (and volume is not an issue as well). The one thing I think I am going to do is upgrade my cartridge. Maybe that will resolve some of the problems, as long as said problems are not purely with the pressings.

TimJo: I agree big time on your point about understanding the cause of surface noise on new vs. old stuff. If I buy a used record and it has surface noise, no complaints from me, as that's understandable. But if I buy a brand new record, in my opinion, it better sound like a brand new record. And by that I mean, it better not be warped and it better not have any of the specific problems I mentioned in my original message.

Mattstrike: I listened to some of the records prior to tuning the turntable setup, and some of them after doing so. And the ones I listened to prior to the fine tuning, I re-listened to once again after the fine tuning. I thought my setup could be the source of the problem, so that's why I had it fine tuned. But the problematic records I listened to before the fine tuning still exhibited the same problems after the fine tuning. As for the wiring in the tone arm being a possible source of the problem, do you know how I could test this? Would poor wiring cause only some records to sound bad, while others sound pristine? I'm not sure. Sadly, my local hi-fi dealer probably is not the kind of place that would allow me to bring in my turntable to play it on multiple different setups. For instance, the guy that fine tuned my turntable for me said he was "breaking protocol" by agreeing to do so free of charge (I was willing to pay him some money for his time, but in the end, he said I didn't have to but that I should buy something from the store in the future.) But I'll definitely inquire.

As for buying a new cartridge, does anyone know if the Grado Black or the Shure MX 97 E are good then it comes to dealing with surface noise?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Vinyl playback issues