This spot reserved for our meet impressions.
Impressions:
The Denon D5000 is very bassy and has very forward treble and upper mids. As Fitz said "It has a very smiley face EQ". I agree with this. It also has a closed headphone coloration. Not bad, but definitely not my cup of tea.
Beyer DT880: Pretty good. Well-balanced over all, but slightly bassy, and the upper treble is emphasized.
AKG K400: This headphone is awesome. Very light and airy sounding, almost delicate. Good for acoustic music. Sounds much better than the K701s or K240s.
Sennheiser HD25-1 II: Surprisingly good. I thought they looked kind of clunky and throwaway, but they sound very good indeed. Slightly dark, but otherwise well-balanced.
Stax Sigma/404: Now these I liked.
Out of all of the headphones at the whole meet, these had the most balanced and even frequency response, and clearly beat out all of the others in terms of speed, detail, etc. But seriously. I listened to every headphone there and none of them had the same combination of excellent qualities that my Stax headphones have. It seemed like each and every one of them had some kind of problem; peaks and dips in the frequency response, too slow, too bassy, too much treble, etc.The only other 'phones that came close were the HD600s. The 600s and my Stax are very comparable in terms of overall presentation. The stats take everything good about the 600 sound and add in the speed and detail that only an electrostatic headphone can give. As someone there (I think it was Fitz) remarked "Senns with speed..."
AKG K240 Sextett: I can't believe people think these sound good. I tried several test songs on them, and I heard the same problem every time: these headphones have a drastically dished upper midrange! They are incredibly dark, perhaps the darkest headphones I've ever heard. They are also extremely bassy.








.













































