Quote:
Originally Posted by cconnaker 
I hope your are just pulling our chain here with that statement.
I just got done reviewing the new Reference Recordings HRx albums with a resolution of 24 bit / 176.4 kHz. I've never hard anything sound better in my life. In addition I've ripped several DVD-Audio discs at 24/96 and the sound compared to the 16/44.1 version is so much better I can't even listen to the CD version anymore.
|
We covered this in the 16bit vs 24bit thread. In short, there is absolutely nothing to be gained using 24bit unless you are a recording engineer. There is no added resolution or quality to be gained compared to 16bit and this is true of both the theory and the practice. Unless you can hear sounds up to about 80kHz (normal human hearing is about 20kHz) a sample frequency of 176.4 is just as pointless.
If the recording sounds better it's because they have recorded, mixed and/or mastered it better, not because of the format it's in. In other words, take that recording and re-sample to 16bit/44.1k (using a good quality dithering unit) and it would not be possible to hear a difference.