Quote:
Originally Posted by QQQ 
1. IGrado, SR-60, Sr-80.
2. SR-125, SR-225.
3. SR-325, RS-2, RS-1.
4. GS-1000.
And sonic differences between models with same drivers are due to enclosure differences and pads.
Is this true??
|
Why do you ask? And why do you divide along the lines that you do? Why not say that the iGrado to the SR-325i use the same driver, the RS-2 and RS-1 use the same driver and the PS-1 and the GS-1K use the same driver?
Quote:
Originally Posted by QQQ 
The question is-how massive is this tweaking, maybe it's to the point where it can't be even considered same driver anymore 
|
Do you need to replace the handle or the head, or both, before its a different broom?
Quote:
Originally Posted by charonme 
if they have the nerve to sell their products in Europe for 2x the US price they surely have the nerve to use the same driver (with perhaps modified housing/cups/cables) and ask different prices for them too
|
Excellent, insightful, penetrative and wholly endearing first post. Welcome. ¬_¬
To add my pennyworth, the housing does make a huge difference to the sound of a driver. Such we well know from say, the Lambda vs the Sigma, or the HF-1 vs the HHF-1.
Where does this suspicion of the Grado drivers originate from? Grado drivers between models look just as similar as drivers between Sennheiser models (HD650/HD600) or even the similarities between drivers from different manufacturers (Goldring DR-100 driver, PX100 driver, Mellow MH-1 driver, KSC-75 driver).
What seems to set people off about Grado is two things, firstly this ongoing myth, goodness knows where it originally came from, that there must be some kind of same driver conspiracy at work, fuelled as it is by the fact that the drivers in Grado headphones are not as readily accessible and therefore less easily scrutinised as those from other headphones.
The Edition 9 uses the same driver as other Ultrasone models a fraction of the price. Surely then its easy enough to carve out a piece of wood to match the Edition 9 housing, slap in that driver from the cheaper model and presto, $1500 dollar headphone.
Same for the Stax 4070, DIY yourself a damped cup the same size, slap a SR-404 driver in there and bam there you go.
The point is that, irrespective of what drivers are used where and in what configurations, the sound, for people who listen to these headphones, changes, and they pay for these changes.
If grado came out and said, yes, we use the same driver for XXX and XXX and XXX, or for all of YYY. What would be the reaction? Those who love to slam them for their overseas pricing and their apparent shadiness to this point will go to town crucifying them for conning people for years, not dissimilarly to what happened when someone took apart the RA-1 amp, and throwing the irate rant about rip offs and profiteering, and I'd bet right now that most of those people either wont own a Grado product at all, or wil have perhaps previously owned a low end model.
If Grado never made such an announcement, they continue to get the squinty eye probing them, and the flapping mouth making claims which end up becoming unofficial fact just because they're flapped so often.
Lose-Lose for Grado it would seem.