Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › Pictures of Your Portable Rig [Part XI]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Pictures of Your Portable Rig [Part XI] - Page 82

post #1216 of 1377
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrototypeX2 View Post
I miscomprehended you, too, then.
Seeming that your post, with only reference by "big picture" (by the way 1024px × 683px is considered large as well), followed Darkkopi's post, it was natural for me to infer that you were referring to Darkkopi's picture. Definitely a mistake on my part.
However, I've went through quite a few of your posts and found that most were rather very shallow in meaning and short in general. That and the fact that you have made over a thousand posts within three months make me assume that you are a spammer.
ok lets get a few things straight

1024x683 is considered large by you, not me.

if you did actually go and look at my posts, then you have too much time on your hands. find better use of it.

yes, my posts are "shallow" and "short". what is your point? that i dont contribute to the community? that i know nothing? that i am fool? do you know what pms i do? no i didnt think so. I, like most people over here tend to help out via pms. it is easier.

do you actually know what a spam is? here ill make it easy for you:

"Spam refers to the practice of blindly posting commercial messages or advertisements to a large number"

i dare you to find me one post in which i have advertised anything at all. and if you do, ill give you a cookie, and then tell you to get a life. jeebus christ, this is is a forum with light hearted people. if the mods felt that i was not welcome, they would tell me. exactly who the hell are you to call me spammer?
post #1217 of 1377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkkopi View Post

Hoooooo.... One of the best portables I've seen in head-fi

I wish I have that setup; definetely /droolworthy

Enjoy the music
post #1218 of 1377
Thread Starter 
i dnt get how ppl use grados in public - they are open, so they leak sound like anything and they dnt isolate :S
post #1219 of 1377
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-man View Post
ok lets get a few things straight

1024x683 is considered large by you, not me.

if you did actually go and look at my posts, then you have too much time on your hands. find better use of it.

yes, my posts are "shallow" and "short". what is your point? that i dont contribute to the community? that i know nothing? that i am fool? do you know what pms i do? no i didnt think so. I, like most people over here tend to help out via pms. it is easier.

do you actually know what a spam is? here ill make it easy for you:

"Spam refers to the practice of blindly posting commercial messages or advertisements to a large number"

i dare you to find me one post in which i have advertised anything at all. and if you do, ill give you a cookie, and then tell you to get a life. jeebus christ, this is is a forum with light hearted people. if the mods felt that i was not welcome, they would tell me. exactly who the hell are you to call me spammer?
The difference in the perspective of the size is, as mentioned, the problem. This does not disprove that you made a wrong comment, but show that there was indeed a mismatch in comprehension. And, yes, I do have much time on my hands that I actually put towards my hobbies, and this includes surfing the web and reading Head-Fi. I rather use my time very well and I don't feel that I need to take commands from the means like you.
I called you a spammer because I felt you were posting things with very little sentimental value just for the gains of increase in post count, as many have before during the course of my three-year visit here. As to how forum spams are defined, they are "advertisements, abusive, or unneeded messages on Internet forums". As you probably can guess yourself, I found the majority of your posts unneeded and hence called you out as a spammer. I also think I have the freedom to call anyone either a spammer or troll in internet forums if it is what I believe. It is up to you to either take it offensively or not.
This will be my final post regarding this (if you want to continue, do so by the oh-so-well used PM system, and contrary to what you think, I am an avid user of pm).
post #1220 of 1377
Quote:
Originally Posted by FeedMeTrance View Post
i dnt get how ppl use grados in public - they are open, so they leak sound like anything and they dnt isolate :S
The grados are very photogenic, don't you think?
post #1221 of 1377
Thread Starter 
they are

but u cant use them in public!
post #1222 of 1377
Actually, I see more Grados in public than any other "audiophile" headphone (although I agree this is generally silly due to lack of isolation).
post #1223 of 1377
Interesting... instead of Grados, I see a lot of UE IEMs like the triple.fi and super.fi at school.
post #1224 of 1377
Love the grado in public!!
Noone wants to look bad but I think they look good!!
post #1225 of 1377
I dont go out in the city enough, but the most used IEM i see at my high school is ermmmm....errrr, a canalphone, CX300's...

Seen a couple of people using them, no other IEM's as such, or headphones. One kid in my year wore a small pair of sony DJ phones once...

Matt
post #1226 of 1377
post #1227 of 1377
Nice pic smallmouth. The all Black looks good. Those are leather pads?? How do you like them compared to velour?
post #1228 of 1377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akabeth View Post
Hoooooo.... One of the best portables I've seen in head-fi

I wish I have that setup; definetely /droolworthy

Enjoy the music
i'm totally enjoying!

Thanks!
post #1229 of 1377
post #1230 of 1377
reciprocum: looks good! How's the SQ?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Portable Source Gear
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › Pictures of Your Portable Rig [Part XI]