Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Little Dot MK II vs III
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Little Dot MK II vs III

post #1 of 4
3/11/08 at 11:44pm
Thread Starter 
I am going to be spending a bit of my tax return on my first tube amp, and I've pretty much decided on either a Little Dot MK II or III. They're both within my price range, and I've heard good things about both. What I haven't heard, though, is a side-by-side comparison. I don't know enough about tube amps to be able to tell from the specs, so I am asking anyone who's heard both to explain the differences between the two.
Reply
post #2 of 4
3/12/08 at 4:36am
The MkII has a smaller footprint than the MkIII, just thought I'd throw it out there in case that matters.
Reply
post #3 of 4
3/12/08 at 11:25am
I love my MKII. I recall, though, that Penchum, in one of his posts, said to go with the MKIII for the extra $40. I am sure you cannot go wrong with either one.
Reply
post #4 of 4
3/12/08 at 1:23pm
That's true. If you have the $40, go for the MKIII. Both are excellent amps and you couldn't go wrong with either one.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphone Amps (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Little Dot MK II vs III