Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Victor HP-FX500 Review: World's first Wood Canalphones
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Victor HP-FX500 Review: World's first Wood Canalphones - Page 21

post #301 of 1079
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinesekiwi View Post
Sibilance actually increased with a bit of burn-in.
Ah, here is where I read it ... any confirmation that they improve?

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #302 of 1079
I must say that I believe the top end does calm down again after a while.... I haven''t kept any log or otherwise of how many hours mine have on them, but its a lot.... and now, I can have mine on at full volume with no problems

Hehe, if cn11 is the FX champion, I wonder what that makes me lol
post #303 of 1079

I (finally) pulled the trigger

Well, thank you folks for giving me information which (partly) influenced my decision. I went with the Atrio (for now) it's long history of great reviews and the fact they are the "version 2" (perhaps any shortcomings have been addressed?) helped tilt the scale.
Thats not to say that I would not snap up a pair of FX500s from someone on here that wasn't completely in love with them. I know mice elf well enough to know "I will" own a pair of FX500s if not right away then maybe just a bit down the road.
This is a crazy money sucking hobby we have eh? Could be worse though, we could be crack addicts.....lol At least we get amzing enjoyment from our purchases. I know I do anyway. Peace everyone, I should grab a bite to eat.
post #304 of 1079

Is the entire chain solid?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksu06 View Post
Hmmm, I'm a bit confused, just when I thought the harshness in the upper mids/low treble was smoothing out, I come back after another 15 hour burn in session and they sound worse than when I began the day. I have about 45 hours of burn in so far. Did others notice this phenomenon or is my hearing going?! I could have sworn that I read somewhere someone saying that these get more sibilant with burn in ... do they smooth out after further burn in? Perhaps they really need the recommended 200 hours?
Which iPod are you using?
post #305 of 1079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody469 View Post
Which iPod are you using?
I think it is a 4th or 5th gen iPod classic (I'm not sure, I lost count of all the iPod gens, but anyway its the 60gb one) ... however, I haven't really been using the iPod as I use a pink noise generator on my computer for burn in, so I have them plugged into my desk setup (DAC straight to starving student). Do you think the issue is related to my setup?
post #306 of 1079
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan View Post
I must say that I believe the top end does calm down again after a while.... I haven''t kept any log or otherwise of how many hours mine have on them, but its a lot.... and now, I can have mine on at full volume with no problems

Hehe, if cn11 is the FX champion, I wonder what that makes me lol
it makes you the god? maybe... i'll rethink my naming strategy.
post #307 of 1079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan View Post
I must say that I believe the top end does calm down again after a while.... I haven''t kept any log or otherwise of how many hours mine have on them, but its a lot.... and now, I can have mine on at full volume with no problems

Hehe, if cn11 is the FX champion, I wonder what that makes me lol
I hope it does calm down more. I think I probably have a little over 100 hours on them so far, so we'll see when it gets to more like 200ish. It's definitely a little better now than when out of the box.
post #308 of 1079
Ok, I have 70 hours on these and the most noticeable improvement is bass detail ... amazing! Really liking the bass quality and how low it reaches. The harshness in the highs is only slightly better, hope it mellows out noticeably more with further burn in ... while the bass and instrument separation are top notch, if this harshness doesn't go away after 200 hours, I think I will have to part ways with the FX-500s ... I really hope this doesn't happen, though, because there is so much to like about these IEMs!
post #309 of 1079
Thread Starter 
i never had the problem with harsh highs - i think it has to do with inner ear shape. mine are narrow so the foams or silicon pieces probably bunched up to create an efficient sibilance blocker.
post #310 of 1079
shigzeo-
You are very fortunate to have natural built-in sibilance blockers!
post #311 of 1079
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cn11 View Post
shigzeo-
You are very fortunate to have natural built-in sibilance blockers!
yeah, i guess so, but with small mouth iems like westone and ety, i did not have good luck. the um2 and the er4s (which i loved - both) were sibilant to me.
post #312 of 1079
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksu06 View Post
I think it is a 4th or 5th gen iPod classic (I'm not sure, I lost count of all the iPod gens, but anyway its the 60gb one) ... however, I haven't really been using the iPod as I use a pink noise generator on my computer for burn in, so I have them plugged into my desk setup (DAC straight to starving student). Do you think the issue is related to my setup?
I have the 80gb.... try this.. plug them straight into the Ipdo H/P out and put the EQ on "Loudness"... Pretty amazing straight out of H/P.. Your Ipod should have the Wofson DAC which is considered to be the best Ipod DAC so far. I know it's considered sacralige to use an EQ around these parts put I find that these Victors can really benefit from a touch of EQ.
post #313 of 1079
Quote:
Originally Posted by boomy3555 View Post
I have the 80gb.... try this.. plug them straight into the Ipdo H/P out and put the EQ on "Loudness"... Pretty amazing straight out of H/P.. Your Ipod should have the Wofson DAC which is considered to be the best Ipod DAC so far. I know it's considered sacralige to use an EQ around these parts put I find that these Victors can really benefit from a touch of EQ.
Alright, I am not opposed to EQing, so I will definitely give that a shot some time today. Thanks for the tip.
post #314 of 1079

I REALLY WANT THESE

I'm having a really hard time not buying a pair of these.
I just chose the Atrio M5 instead and am awaiting their arrival.
Had I not bought all that I did this month (amps, v-cap thingies, lods, iems etc) I'd own a pair (FX500)
Anyone wanting to sell, give me a shout. I am unable to use the FS section of this site for some reason. It comes back stating I am not authorized or something like that. Anyone know whats going on with that?
post #315 of 1079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody469 View Post
I'm having a really hard time not buying a pair of these.
I just chose the Atrio M5 instead and am awaiting their arrival.
Had I not bought all that I did this month (amps, v-cap thingies, lods, iems etc) I'd own a pair (FX500)
Anyone wanting to sell, give me a shout. I am unable to use the FS section of this site for some reason. It comes back stating I am not authorized or something like that. Anyone know whats going on with that?
I think the FS section requires that you have at least 50 posts or something like that. Anyway, like I said, if the FX500 are not to my liking after 200 hours, I will definitely give you a shout.

@shigzeo I envy your natural sibilance blockers!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Victor HP-FX500 Review: World's first Wood Canalphones