Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › SQ: nano vs. classic?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

SQ: nano vs. classic?

post #1 of 2
12/24/07 at 11:36am
Thread Starter 
If anybody owns both, how much better does the classic sound? According to ilounge.com, the difference is a matter of baseline noise. Is there a difference in other areas as well?

If this has been visited before please let me know, I searched but couldn't really find anything recent.
Reply
post #2 of 2
12/24/07 at 2:21pm
ummmmm i dont have those but i have a 1st gen nano and a 5.5 video ipod and i can comfortably say the video ipod sounds a lot better, and ipods in general arent rated too highly overall on this forum.

the sound is much more dynamic and bodied? i hav no idea how to describe it, except that its pretty much 1 sided to the video ipod.

most people say the sound quality of nanos hasnt changed much,
and the 5g to classic sq difference is still debated i guess. if this helps.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Portable Source Gear
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › SQ: nano vs. classic?