This is my first 8 hours of my portapros impression (on a intercity bus, in less than ideal environment for an open can).
First thing that stands out: separation of a song's different...
Fantastic sound (compared to the other wireless headphones and normal headphones) although, for me, positioning is very hard to get right, but once right the sound is full and crisp,...
Another Head-Fier here helped me get a pair of these from the Koss outlet store recently. On day one I didn't like them at all. Had this very weird and unbalanced sound signature. When using...
9.2.12,
I received a very small USPS package with my supposedly "new in open box" TF10's. The box, actually, was still sealed, and was from the Amazon Black Friday sale. For a brand new...
Little background, I’m a home theater guy who likes listening to music on his Tannoy’s with a Denon receiver I consider warm. When I upgraded to the Tannoy’s I almost went insane watching...
shall i regal mod it? are there any problems with regal modding and using the 6n1p's with 6n6p's?
The current draw of this combination may pull the voltage down in the PS before the regulator to the point where it drops below 250V. We have seen this before.
However, if this happens we posted a PS mod a few pages back that fixes this. fishski13 has pioneered testing this mod and we do know that it works.
by the way, the 6n1p's make the amp sound more lively, slightly less polite.
glad to hear some impressions on tubes. I also found the white amperex 6dj8's to be more punchy and aggressive than the standard jj/sylvania 6922's. I'm looking forward to trying some 6n1p's myself if I ever get around to it.
on a different note, I will have regal's mod in by the end of the night and I'll try it out with both the jj's and the 6n6p's. My PS seems to have about 15v worth of headroom atm with 6n6p/6dj8/EZ81 combo, so we'll see what happens.
I use those on my SOHA II. They fit the board outline just fine on the Bijou as well. I will use them on my Bijou as well.
They "seem" a little better than the Wakefields. I've used both in the past, and I can't say I really notice a difference, but the datasheet shows some.
Digikey and Mouser only stock the 2.0" Wakefields, but they have the 2.5" Aavids.
Edit: BTW, the 634s you linked to won't fit the board, but I suppose you can let it dangle and rest on the board. You need the space underneath for convection. The bigger sinks are better (637 or the Aavid).
sigh...well scratch that. Just as it is too late to run to parts express for a replacement, my ez81 is blowing fuses left and right and arcing internally so I'm back to ez80 for now. No mods till monday. I'm a sad panda
edit: I need to shoot that black cat outside of my house or something. My JJ 6922 just lost one of its pins while swapping tubes
Chobint, here's the schematic you were looking for.......
Pabbi, let me know if there is anything I can do to help. I hope that damn intermittent ON/OFF is found. The amp was working so well, I just don't get it.
runeright and holland,
thanks guys! i've removed the internal divider between the transfos and PS boards to free up some air movement. with the divider in place, the PS boards are effectively in a partitioned "chamber". i'm going to keep the BJT multipliers - i sacrificed a $12 EZ81 to get it operational damn it .
chobint,
i feel your pain - losing a tube is a real bummer. the arching noise is a bit unsettling as well.
I have been pulling tubes in out out to get a good picture of the differences.
The is no contest, the 6n1p wins on detail, bass (tuneful..its tightened up no end since intitial testing), soundstage. to my ears its all round a better experience. Quiet strange really, looking at the datasheet the point we are operating at is more linear with the 6922s.
Parts inbound, so I'll start the procedure tomorrow evening - where I have Phoenix connectors, do I just screw in the NFB resistor? Guess I need to fill out where I only had some 2 position connectors to cover the 3 holes, since I was never going to need NFB...
rhys h, there is an alternative to using that meter. You would solder a 1ohm 1w resistor in series with the tube cathode you want to measure to ground and put a 100mv scale meter across the 1 ohm resistor. Then 1mv=1ma of bias current(V/R=I and 1mv/1ohm = 1ma). Remember that you will be measuring the bias of an individual tube, and there are 5 tubes, in a single ended Bijou all fixed biased with their individual resistors.
Pabbi, once you have installed the 3 position phoenix, it is a simple procedure of just cutting the resistor leads and bending them to fit and tightening down with the connections. This allows you to experiment with different values to find what sounds right to you.
blah...so my brand spanking new ECC99's are drawing more current than my 6n6p's, which is the opposite of what's supposed to happen right?
Readings taken with the PSU pot in the same position (somewhere in the middle):
EZ81/6n6p -
R8 - 315.5v
R7 - 278v
B+ - 256v
EZ81/ECC99
R8 - 306v
R7 - 263v
B+ - 250.8
EZ80/ECC99 combo also proves unable to give 250V @ B+. The reading seem to indicate that the ECC99's are actually drawing the EZ81 PSU below the intended operating points?? Any reasonable explanations for such behavior, or should I be sending these back for a new pair?
edit: this is the the boards setup in stock config