Originally Posted by bigshot
It's my understanding that you can discuss the results of objective testing, just not the methodology.
That's the problem! The minute one reports objective results from a test, someone else questions the methodology and one wouldn't be able to defend the methodology.
It's OK though, I'm not bitter, I'm amused. You and I know well that the entire physics, engineering, and psychology faculties of MIT could stand behind said methodology and many people around here would still cry foul, question the results, and (as in the other thread related to this issue) question knowledge itself just to "prove" what they can hear.