Quote:
|
Why is coax better? Because you can upsample? I also had been trying to get a grips on what the best method for sending my digital signal to my Zero. I was using the optical out of my crappy motherboard soundcard but I started to notice a little distortion at times. This also occured with the coax out of my soundcard. I am now using the free Xitel that came with my Zero and do not notice any distortions. Would it be worth getting a usb->digital coax?
|
More important reasons would be that most optical cables are made of POF (Plastic Optical Fiber), and for that reason alone they are lossy.
Other problem with POF is that a typical plastic based TOSlink has 5MHz to 6MHz of bandwidth, but for instance you require a minimum of 9Mhz Bandwidth for 16 bit LPCM...
And a citation that points to this bandwidth problem, quoting from the Rémy Fourré Stereophile article "Jitter and the Digital Interface" published in the October, 1993 issue:
Quote:
| " A word about optical links. Still using the example above with digital signals A and B, a low-pass filter at 5MHz-typical of TosLink-causes a time difference of 121ps. A 6MHz low-pass filter causes a time difference of 33ps. For adequate performance, optical links must have a bandwidth of 9MHz minimum. To operate at 48kHz and have a 15% margin for speed adjustments, the interface bandwidth must be at least 11MHz." |
Coax cables are easily accessible, have more bandwidth, are rugged, the connections are better (RCA or BNC) and in general less problematic, so, among other reasons this is why coax is recommended.
The Xitel is kinda sucky (adds lots of jitter), I would recommend a better soundcard or a transport like this one: http://www.audiophilechina.com/cp-sh...S_id2=77&s_id= (This option is limited to 48/16 FYI)












