Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Computer Audio › emu 0404 usb VS emu 1212m (pci), or other alternatives?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

emu 0404 usb VS emu 1212m (pci), or other alternatives?

post #1 of 23
Thread Starter 
Eh darn it, I deleted the whole thing. I write way to much.

To make a short story short, I need a device for recording vocals/guitars, and don't have any amplification equipment. So I guess 0404usb is my final choice.


Thanks for the help everyone!
post #2 of 23
I'm interested in the answer to this too...

Although I suspect with this question you're just going to get a bunch of knee-jerk responses pro-external, anti-PCI, and few useful actual comparisons.
post #3 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by badmonkey View Post
I'm interested in the answer to this too...

Although I suspect with this question you're just going to get a bunch of knee-jerk responses pro-external, anti-PCI, and few useful actual comparisons.
Hope I get that :P

External is actually quite useful in some ways, but really not in others. And I'll always have the suspicion of worse sound quality. (Based on specs the 1212m should be better, just it doesn't have a headphone amp)
post #4 of 23
Functionality notwithstanding, you will get told that external is better because of sound quality. Internal is "bad" because of interference from the computer. I am not convinced and have not seen any proof of this.

Personally I would choose just on functionality with a preference to internal, why have an extra box lying around... as to the amp, I would prefer not to have it integrated as it's not something that can be removed or upgraded later.

From what threads I've skimmed on the topic, I also haven't seen anyone able to conclusively identify the differences in sound, if there are any, between the 0404 internal and the 0404 USB.
post #5 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by badmonkey View Post
From what threads I've skimmed on the topic, I also haven't seen anyone able to conclusively identify the differences in sound, if there are any, between the 0404 internal and the 0404 USB.
I think I'll end up getting the 1212m. Though it's supposedly harder to use, and less "feature pumped", it's just more conventional to have it-inside- the computer instead of outside. I don't have room for a huge box as the 0404 usb and have no need of an amplifier right now (and if I will an external one would do the job better). My iem's/senns can be easily driven through an unamped output.

About the line in amps, I hope I won't be missing them much when recording (as I said I want to start recording more seriously)

You think it would be a problem?
post #6 of 23
For recording you could always add a budget mixer with some pres.
post #7 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredy View Post
For recording you could always add a budget mixer with some pres.
:erk:, it's my first "real" computer interface device... I don't plan on getting a couple of products...

Is recording guitars unamped truely impossible? (My guitar multi-effect, boss gt-6 actually could act as a pre-amp. and I'm not sure about vocal recording yet, I don't have any mic at the moment. I'd probably get a relatively cheap one)
post #8 of 23
If your going for the 1212m keep a few things in mind
1) Its not really that prone to PCI interference, because the analog board is not connected to the PCI bus, it is kept seperate and connects to the digital board via a digital ribbon cable, thus keeping it clean. The analoge daughter card is what you'll be using for your recording / output anyways.

2) If you plan to plug your headphones directly in, you will need adapters, the 1212m only accepts 1/4" TSR mono connections. Do some searching you'll find what you need.

3) Read the patchmix manual, its not that hard to use.

4) You will need a MIC pre-amp, the inputs are no amplification on the 1212m. Same for anything you plug in.
post #9 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by nadavnaz View Post
:erk:, it's my first "real" computer interface device... I don't plan on getting a couple of products...

Is recording guitars unamped truely impossible? (My guitar multi-effect, boss gt-6 actually could act as a pre-amp. and I'm not sure about vocal recording yet, I don't have any mic at the moment. I'd probably get a relatively cheap one)
Definitely try it what you have before spending any money. Im not sure how high the gain is on the 1212 but you can always see how your results are. When I said a budget mixer I mean ones with some pres in it that give you a nice airy sound for vocals . There are some cheap berhinger ones.
post #10 of 23
Thread Starter 
(just for you to understand my recording capabilities:http://www.esnips.com/doc/54d2dbe3-6...387/Diversion3

I reccomend to listen through relatively high impadence cans. Lots of backround noise on this track. The other one in the same folder, distant, was recorded from the emulated line out of a cheap 15w guitar amplifier...... :erk: the multi effect sounds a #$%^load better, but still my recording sounds pretty weak)
post #11 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by nadavnaz View Post
...this time I'd like to hear audio LIKE A HUMAN BEING
I can't tell you how beautiful this statement is... VERY nice work!
post #12 of 23
If you want to begin recording, you'll need microphone preamplifiers. Direct effects units will only take you so far--you'll eventually want to mic up a real guitar cabinet. You have a need for a headphone amplifier so that you don't accidentally blow your ears away when the software volume control suddenly ramps up, and also because it will drive the headphones more efficiently.

So, 0404 USB.

Also, there is no Firewire port on the version 2 1212Ms. It has been replaced with an EDI port that allows you to attach a MicroDock if you wish to upgrade it to a 1616/1616M.

I own the 1212M and plan on buying the 0404 USB just to fill in some missing features. Plus, it's portable and can be used with a laptop. It can also act as an external DAC/amp away from a computer.

Regarding sound quality differences, the edge in pedigree goes to the Cirrus CS4398 DACs in the 1212M, but the AKM AK4396 is no slouch either. Some people say that the AK4396 is "more musical" while the CS4398 has more detail and resolution. When I first heard the 1212M, I couldn't believe the sheer amount of stuff I was hearing--it really highlights the upper midrange through the extended treble, while still remaining solid in the other ranges. From what I can gather through others' opinions, the 0404 USB is somewhat more laid-back in its presentation, and some might perceive it as being less analytical than the 1212M.
post #13 of 23
what about the E-Mu 1212m (pci) vs. the E-Mu 0404 (pci) because I am looking into a pci unit.
post #14 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by mow_the_hawk View Post
what about the E-Mu 1212m (pci) vs. the E-Mu 0404 (pci) because I am looking into a pci unit.
The only advantage the 0404 PCI has over the 1212M is price. Otherwise, 1212M all the way.
post #15 of 23
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by poo View Post
I can't tell you how beautiful this statement is... VERY nice work!
Hehe, thanks :P

Quote:
Originally Posted by infinitesymphony View Post
If you want to begin recording, you'll need microphone preamplifiers. Direct effects units will only take you so far--you'll eventually want to mic up a real guitar cabinet. You have a need for a headphone amplifier so that you don't accidentally blow your ears away when the software volume control suddenly ramps up, and also because it will drive the headphones more efficiently.
Though I don't own any high impedance cans (I probably will someday) I see what you're saying... And to record vocals and such I'll need input amplifiers, which I don't plan on getting separately. So the 0404usb is the way to go.

I don't have wallet options for a better cabinet (Hehe, cabinet. I'm using a 15w marshall.) so recording using my boss gt-6, or through computer dsp software is my only option, but looking ahead you're right.

My boss gt-6 has a "Cabinet Simulator", which seriously kinda sucks but It'll do the trick for a budget-minded 15 year old like me. :P

Quote:
Originally Posted by infinitesymphony View Post
Regarding sound quality differences, the edge in pedigree goes to the Cirrus CS4398 DACs in the 1212M, but the AKM AK4396 is no slouch either. Some people say that the AK4396 is "more musical" while the CS4398 has more detail and resolution. When I first heard the 1212M, I couldn't believe the sheer amount of stuff I was hearing--it really highlights the upper midrange through the extended treble, while still remaining solid in the other ranges. From what I can gather through others' opinions, the 0404 USB is somewhat more laid-back in its presentation, and some might perceive it as being less analytical than the 1212M.
My votes usually go towards analytical sound>texture/"fun". But I can't compromise on all the other built in components (I don't have input preamps, headphone amps etc.), and I guess a unit like the 0404usb will be one hell of an improvement both in detail and musicality over a "Creative-Zen Microphoto" mp3 player as an ultra-lossy source :P.

Looking forward for hearing bit-true lossless.


Thanks for the advice!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Computer Audio
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Computer Audio › emu 0404 usb VS emu 1212m (pci), or other alternatives?