Originally Posted by LawnGnome
Then maybe you should focus on your reading comprehension.
Because you obviously did not understand my post at all.
WE DO NOT see the earth move around the sun. We observe the effects of the earth moving around the sun, and from that we can extrapolate that it does in fact move around the sun, even without actually seeing it move around the sun.
This is relevant to you saying people have not tried this tweak.
Because we do not actually need to use the product. We can use our reasoning to determine it is BS.
I understand your post perfectly well. Nonetheless, you observe the earth move around the sun every day as the sun is seen in various positions. What you don't 'directly' observe is THAT it moves around the sun, i.e., how to interpret what you observe. But then one never does.
Second, your idiotic reposte pretends not to know that we have a community of knowledge whereby under specified conditions we use the observations and experiments of others when reported with rigor as a substitute for our own direct observation lest we all be required to constantly reinvent the wheel and every other thing. Astronauts have observed it directly, for whatever that's worth, and so have you if you've ever watched the shadow of the earth move across the face of the moon during a lunar eclipse (how's your reading ability?).
Someone or one's self needs to observe/listen to the codename turquoise methodically and scientifically and report on whether there is a repeatable and reproduceable improvement or not before ANYONE can say he KNOWs it's so, regardless of the fact that it seems so unlikely to most. The unfounded extrapolation from the worthlessness of other MD devices that work differently if at all on different things in different ways is nothing like the deduction (not extrapolation) of an orbit from other sound observations of celestial bodies.
Again I say, these anti-intellectual, ill-informed and childishly unthinking repostes ruin these threads, undermine the useful conveyance of ideas and information by those who have a background to offer them to other readers. I will not participate further if other readers do not speak up to counter this. Yes I know some may welcome this. Your loss.