I wanted to find out what the frequency response of my EMU 0202 USB was in both directions. Started with DAC only to find out that when I pushed samples out at 192 KHz I could see sharp increase of attenuation above 21 kHz. I expected to see some filtering there, my hope was for the cut-off frequency to be somewhat higher. Perhaps above 50 kHz. Why would the designers be so conservative? Is it because if cuf-off was set higher than for audio signals it would complicate the circuits / PCB? I heard there were PC sound cards with same ADC/DAC parameters (24/192kHz) that would produce higher frequencies (perhaps digitize higher freq. , too)...
Those were PCI though, so not ideal for me.
You see, I wanted to use my box not only for audio processing, but also some baseband singnal processing in RF related field
Share your thoughts, please.
Side question: if filtering limits the bandwidth to audio signals - why bother going up to 192 kHz? To get so many samples per period (and increase amount raw data available for processing)?
Thanks, Peter
Those were PCI though, so not ideal for me.
You see, I wanted to use my box not only for audio processing, but also some baseband singnal processing in RF related field

Share your thoughts, please.
Side question: if filtering limits the bandwidth to audio signals - why bother going up to 192 kHz? To get so many samples per period (and increase amount raw data available for processing)?
Thanks, Peter









