Post Your Photography Here #2 (new dial-up 800X600 friendly) - Page 667

one more from these:

Mini yellow watermelons and green oranges.

More from my recent trip up north:

More pictures can be found at my website than I'm going to post here, but I'll probably do a few more of my favorites.

I've also entered in the One Life photography contest, so if anyone else is part of that you can put in a vote for (or 'collect', as it's called) my portfolio after following the link in my signature. If you don't want to, that's fine as well.

Omen

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon L 

Omen

 

 

Do you care If I crop this and use it as a desktop background? That's a really awesome shot!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Austin Morrow 

 

Do you care If I crop this and use it as a desktop background? That's a really awesome shot!

Sure go ahead.

I love my 480mm

102550100 NestedThreadedFlat Oldest FirstNewest First

Edit

~LowKeyReality 6 minutes ago

I read about this guy doing wedding portraits. He stated not using the raw files but only the jpegs out of the camera, un tweaked. He then explained how he always edged the white balance to get him some natural warmth. I though he was crazy and could not believe how I could live with-out my raw data and photo shop. I was not sure how to consistently warm up the white balance in every light? In the end though he was right. 

Now I know why he is one of the most in-demand wedding photographers in America.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redcarmoose 

My process is really simple for doing these type of portraits. I relax and just look for people in good lighting areas as I feel the light is 90% of the shot. The next thing I do shoot a bunch of shots as people are always moving and changing their facial expressions and angles. I will set the white balance for shade, plus a level of red to add warmth. I shoot with a 480mm lens so I keep my iso at 800 to keep the shutter speed at 1/400 at about F5.6 to F4.0. I don't use photo shop now but just use the jpegs out of the camera as I think they look better.

 

 

 

102550100 NestedThreadedFlat Oldest FirstNewest First

Edit

~LowKeyReality 6 minutes ago

I read about this guy doing wedding portraits. He stated not using the raw files but only the jpegs out of the camera, un tweaked. He then explained how he always edged the white balance to get him some natural warmth. I though he was crazy and could not believe how I could live with-out my raw data and photo shop. I was not sure how to consistently warm up the white balance in every light? In the end though he was right. 

Now I know why he is one of the most in-demand wedding photographers in America.

An interesting view, although I disagree with it. It probably works better for portrait work than the kind of photography I typically engage in, however - modern cameras are already optimized quite well for human subjects. I view taking a straight out-of-the-camera JPEG much the same as using an automated development process instead of artistically developing the film yourself. You lose a lot of potential to bring out your vision of the final print.

Started a 100 strangers project! Here are the first two people. 

Finally managed to squeeze some shooting time into my currently hurried schedule, and managed to come back with this one:

Been a while since my phone was used at all.

Slightly edited 1080p wallpaper from a picture taken inside the British Museum

Unedited stuff, do click it so you can see:

^

I'm going to be in London soon :)

It's summer and the weather looks so dreary...

Stay in Australia.

Rent a place around Katoomba/Blackheath and spend the time trolling around the Blue Mountains.