Quote:
Originally Posted by Wodgy 
The absolute distribution is details and for the most part doesn't matter. The 50% of the population that is below average are not going to be stellar engineers, professors, physicians, computer programmers, etc. Unless you've ever worked retail or customer service, it's hard to appreciate just how dull people in that bottom 50% can be... but a well-constructed society needs jobs for those people too.
|
But who's to say if that 3% of the population that scores 99 on an IQ test are not smart enough to become an engineer? Likewise, I'm sure there are people who work in retail who do have an IQ of 100. I know plenty of smart people who I find dull to talk to. IQ tests can only tell you so much. I think they can help shed light on how much of the population is truely incompetant (ie that 9% that's under 80). It has almost as much coorelation as wealth: basically a high IQ score means that you can take an IQ test. It doesn't mean that you'll become a brain surgeon or rocket scientist....it also doesn't mean you'll become a millionaire.
I have one friend who's extremely book smart, but I know won't make it far in life: he just has no common sense when it comes money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wodgy 
I agree with you there. Expectation and standards do make a difference. For instance, despite stereotypes, research has shown that Asians are roughly as intelligent as everyone else, but being "stupid" is not well regarded in Asian cultures, and thus people are pushed to achieve to the limits of their inherent intellectual horsepower, which is a positive thing. Likewise, there are socioeconomic groups in the US where learning is socially discouraged, and it shows.
However, the idea that college is for everyone is the same flawed idea that economists have been selling, just in different clothing. Not everyone is suited for intellectual pursuits, and a well-constructed economy needs jobs for those individuals as well.
|
I never said college is for everyone.....I stressed the importance of a primary education. Even if there are a certain percentage of people who can't move on to college, they'll still get a better education for finding a better salaried job.
I do think that economics has a lot to do with our current education standards....rich kids can be dumb but still breeze through our school system. Poor kids who are dumb stay dumb and die early (from gangs). My mom helped tutor underprivileged kids at a local high school: she met many who were very smart but had simply given up on school. Who's to say that if circumstances were different, that these kids would have the ability to have a successful career.
Cultural background can be part of it too......I'm Jewish and have noticed that we get lumped in with Asians for being instilled with intellectual pursuits. Even if traditional scholars were ones who just focused on the Torah
