Ok, I've made a friend of mine buy the C700, and I have been able to listen to them tonight.
These are my first impressions. I'll be able to "hire" them some other times when needed. My first, obvious impression is that the C700 sound warm and full. Bass is very nice and hard-hitting, and midrange is quite forward. I can understand soozieq saying that the midrange is what she was looking for, since it may be the best peculiarity of the Denons. Coupled with their good bass presence, it gives prominent vocals.
Vocals sound better than what I recall to be the Shure E500 presentation (artificial, in my opinon), while the bass may be superior on the E500. I recall the Shures to have good quality, flat bass. The C700 seem more midbass oriented. To be honest, the Shure have two woofer drivers that make them able to create that bass, while the Denon are single dynamic driver IEMs. I've always thought that the main problem with the E500 weren't the "rolled off" highs, but it was the midrange, that sounded distant and uninvolving. This is what made me sell them and keep the Etys at that time. The Denon don't have this issue, and to my ears vocals sound natural and pleasant.
Highs on the Denon seem to be subdued, especially in comparison to the ER4P and the Altec Lansing iM716. Sadly, my Altec have been sent to EFN for a recable, so i can't AB them this time.
Vocals are very forward on the Altec iM716, while retaining typical Etymotic presentation. Midrange (but actually all the spectrum) is more detailed with the Altec Lansing than with the Denon. Detail crispness goes to the Altec, while the Denon are thicker. Again, this is very pleasant, especially with some singers (like David Bowie). The Denon aren't as sharp as the Etys, and I don't think sibilance is a problem with them. To be fair, Etys with Shure black foam tips are hardly sibilant. I don't feel like the Denon need to be equalized, while both the Altec and the Etys can grow a lot with the right equalization/amping.
The Denon's soundstage isn't worse than E500 and ER4P's. I'm still waiting for a pair of IEMs that will expand this soundstage to get closer to full size cans. Hopefully, the Triple.fi 10 Pro and Westone 3 will be able to do this.
So, for now:
Denon C700 vs Shure E500
Bass: E500
Midrange: C700
Highs: prolly a tie (can't remember the E500 for an accurate comparison)
Details: E500 (slightly)
Denon C700 vs Altec Lansing iM716
Bass: too different (detailed and deep with the Altec, thicker with the Denon)
Vocals: Altec (for my taste)
Highs: Altec
Details: Altec
In my opinion (for my taste!) the Altec and Etymotic stand on the top of this brief comparison. I would say the Denon and the E500 serve different purposes, but if you are like me and care for close vocals, you may prefer the Denons, that make of warmth and midrange their main strengths.
Last but not least, my impression is that IEMs' average quality is growing more and more. We are able to get good IEMs such as the Denon, or the Altec, that can easily compare to higher priced models. My opinion is that this trend will keep going, and in the medium run IEMs will easily compete with full size headphones for the price... without the need of buying an expensive amp. IEMs are a growing technology that is getting better and cheaper, so we can expect good surprires in the future.
These are my first impressions. I'll be able to "hire" them some other times when needed. My first, obvious impression is that the C700 sound warm and full. Bass is very nice and hard-hitting, and midrange is quite forward. I can understand soozieq saying that the midrange is what she was looking for, since it may be the best peculiarity of the Denons. Coupled with their good bass presence, it gives prominent vocals.
Vocals sound better than what I recall to be the Shure E500 presentation (artificial, in my opinon), while the bass may be superior on the E500. I recall the Shures to have good quality, flat bass. The C700 seem more midbass oriented. To be honest, the Shure have two woofer drivers that make them able to create that bass, while the Denon are single dynamic driver IEMs. I've always thought that the main problem with the E500 weren't the "rolled off" highs, but it was the midrange, that sounded distant and uninvolving. This is what made me sell them and keep the Etys at that time. The Denon don't have this issue, and to my ears vocals sound natural and pleasant.
Highs on the Denon seem to be subdued, especially in comparison to the ER4P and the Altec Lansing iM716. Sadly, my Altec have been sent to EFN for a recable, so i can't AB them this time.
Vocals are very forward on the Altec iM716, while retaining typical Etymotic presentation. Midrange (but actually all the spectrum) is more detailed with the Altec Lansing than with the Denon. Detail crispness goes to the Altec, while the Denon are thicker. Again, this is very pleasant, especially with some singers (like David Bowie). The Denon aren't as sharp as the Etys, and I don't think sibilance is a problem with them. To be fair, Etys with Shure black foam tips are hardly sibilant. I don't feel like the Denon need to be equalized, while both the Altec and the Etys can grow a lot with the right equalization/amping.
The Denon's soundstage isn't worse than E500 and ER4P's. I'm still waiting for a pair of IEMs that will expand this soundstage to get closer to full size cans. Hopefully, the Triple.fi 10 Pro and Westone 3 will be able to do this.
So, for now:
Denon C700 vs Shure E500
Bass: E500
Midrange: C700
Highs: prolly a tie (can't remember the E500 for an accurate comparison)
Details: E500 (slightly)
Denon C700 vs Altec Lansing iM716
Bass: too different (detailed and deep with the Altec, thicker with the Denon)
Vocals: Altec (for my taste)
Highs: Altec
Details: Altec
In my opinion (for my taste!) the Altec and Etymotic stand on the top of this brief comparison. I would say the Denon and the E500 serve different purposes, but if you are like me and care for close vocals, you may prefer the Denons, that make of warmth and midrange their main strengths.
Last but not least, my impression is that IEMs' average quality is growing more and more. We are able to get good IEMs such as the Denon, or the Altec, that can easily compare to higher priced models. My opinion is that this trend will keep going, and in the medium run IEMs will easily compete with full size headphones for the price... without the need of buying an expensive amp. IEMs are a growing technology that is getting better and cheaper, so we can expect good surprires in the future.












