Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Music › What Are You Listening To Right Now? -New thread, new rules. Please read them.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

What Are You Listening To Right Now? -New thread, new rules. Please read them. - Page 3587

post #53791 of 53796
I will listen to both albums and have at it! While this particular piece calls for technical ability, that doesn't mean much if there is no heart. I for one listen more for enjoyment rather than sheer technique and a critical ear, although I do prefer a bit of both. I've only played for 5 years and haven't picked up a violin in some time so I'm in no position to criticize lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Groucho View Post

Soundsgoodtome : That is an excellent Bach musical piece.  Have you listened to the versions by Itzhak Pearlman & Arthur Grumiaux ?  Pearlman's version has been bashed by critics & I can't understand why (probably due to the fact that I'm not a musical expert/critic).  They are both beautifully played; I would deem Grumiaux's version as more technical & Pearlman's version as being more from the heart which is what I generally prefer in music.  Good choice Soundsgoodtome if I may say so.
post #53792 of 53796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundsgoodtome View Post

I will listen to both albums and have at it! While this particular piece calls for technical ability, that doesn't mean much if there is no heart. I for one listen more for enjoyment rather than sheer technique and a critical ear, although I do prefer a bit of both. I've only played for 5 years and haven't picked up a violin in some time so I'm in no position to criticize lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Groucho View Post

Soundsgoodtome : That is an excellent Bach musical piece.  Have you listened to the versions by Itzhak Pearlman & Arthur Grumiaux ?  Pearlman's version has been bashed by critics & I can't understand why (probably due to the fact that I'm not a musical expert/critic).  They are both beautifully played; I would deem Grumiaux's version as more technical & Pearlman's version as being more from the heart which is what I generally prefer in music.  Good choice Soundsgoodtome if I may say so.

The mere fact that you play violin is quite impressive to me personally.  In my case I played the spoons at French Canadian family gatherings when I was younger & I haven't picked up a set of spoons in decades :biggrin:  I envy you.

post #53793 of 53796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Groucho View Post

The mere fact that you play violin is quite impressive to me personally.  In my case I played the spoons at French Canadian family gatherings when I was younger & I haven't picked up a set of spoons in decades biggrin.gif   I envy you.

Violin and Piano to be exact but 5 years is hardly any time. Spoons you say, I'm quite familiar with such graceful instrument. Practice 3x a day.... breakfast lunch and dinner lol
post #53794 of 53796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundsgoodtome View Post

Violin and Piano to be exact but 5 years is hardly any time. Spoons you say, I'm quite familiar with such graceful instrument. Practice 3x a day.... breakfast lunch and dinner lol

LOL !!!!

post #53795 of 53796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Groucho View Post
 

Hey RUMAY408 : I only listen to music on CDs & a few ( very few) vinyl LPs.  I have both the mono & stereo remastered Beatles albums.  I can understand why you mention being torn between Rubber Soul & Abbey Road : to begin with, they are both excellent albums/songs but they also happen to be the two best produced stereo albums in The Beatles' catalog.  As you probably already know up until the White Album, the Beatles music was recorded in mono & then converted to stereo.  When RS was converted to stereo George Martin didn't like the final product and so took it upon himself to rework the stereo version on his own.  When EMI remastered the albums (2009 version) RS is the only album that the engineers did go to the original tapes but rather they used George Martin's original stereo conversion as a basis for the remaster.  If you listen to RS closely it sounds better than Revolver, Pepper, Mystery Tour & even the White Album stereo versions as a whole.  The only other stereo album to sound somewhat better is Abbey Road (I don't personally like Phil Spector's production of Let it be; I prefer the 2004 Let it be … Naked version so I don't count it with the other albums in the catalog which of course were all produced by George Martin).  My favourite Beatles albums in order : WA, RS, AR, REV., MMT, SP & LIBNaked followed by the Past Masters.  Never get tired of listening to this band. :beerchug:

The naked version of Let It Be on vinyl is so much better than the Phil Spector version I'm in total agreement with that.

 

My order Beatles catalog RS>AR>WA>SP>REV>Singles 2nd>Singles 1st>BFS>LIB Naked>MMT>Help>HDN>MTB>YS>LIB (PS)>PPM

post #53796 of 53796
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUMAY408 View Post
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Groucho View Post
 

Hey RUMAY408 : I only listen to music on CDs & a few ( very few) vinyl LPs.  I have both the mono & stereo remastered Beatles albums.  I can understand why you mention being torn between Rubber Soul & Abbey Road : to begin with, they are both excellent albums/songs but they also happen to be the two best produced stereo albums in The Beatles' catalog.  As you probably already know up until the White Album, the Beatles music was recorded in mono & then converted to stereo.  When RS was converted to stereo George Martin didn't like the final product and so took it upon himself to rework the stereo version on his own.  When EMI remastered the albums (2009 version) RS is the only album that the engineers did go to the original tapes but rather they used George Martin's original stereo conversion as a basis for the remaster.  If you listen to RS closely it sounds better than Revolver, Pepper, Mystery Tour & even the White Album stereo versions as a whole.  The only other stereo album to sound somewhat better is Abbey Road (I don't personally like Phil Spector's production of Let it be; I prefer the 2004 Let it be … Naked version so I don't count it with the other albums in the catalog which of course were all produced by George Martin).  My favourite Beatles albums in order : WA, RS, AR, REV., MMT, SP & LIBNaked followed by the Past Masters.  Never get tired of listening to this band. :beerchug:

The naked version of Let It Be on vinyl is so much better than the Phil Spector version I'm in total agreement with that.

 

My order Beatles catalog RS>AR>WA>SP>REV>Singles 2nd>Singles 1st>BFS>LIB Naked>MMT>Help>HDN>MTB>YS>LIB (PS)>PPM

+1 on your order, I mean it's the bloody Beatles so how can any fan of their music argue with another fan about which one they like better.  Thumbs up to this post RUMAY408 !

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Music
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Music › What Are You Listening To Right Now? -New thread, new rules. Please read them.