Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Discussions › Twisted Pear Audio Opus DAC
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Twisted Pear Audio Opus DAC - Page 10

post #136 of 987
9/22/07 at 11:20am
I think they were getting together this weekend.
Reply
post #137 of 987
9/22/07 at 12:10pm
I've gotta get ahold of Jim, I was hoping to meet tomorrow, but I haven't heard from him.
Reply
post #138 of 987
9/26/07 at 5:34pm
Any impression of the Opus with headphones ?
Reply
post #139 of 987
10/3/07 at 6:15pm
And I'm curious if anyone has used this DAC without the Ballsie with a headphone amp. They say that the benefit of using it is that it isn't a very good current source (i.e. amps < 1K impedance) - but my Beta22 (almost done) and Dynalo have 50K impedances, so, it seems like it would be unnecessary.
Brad
Reply
post #140 of 987
10/7/07 at 12:57am
I wish I could DIY. I want an OPUS so much...

Also, what's the difference between using one DAC module, or running it in a dual-mono configuration?
Reply
post #141 of 987
10/7/07 at 8:11am
Better SNR because of the higher output levels and, one would imagine, better seperation between the channels...
Reply
post #142 of 987
10/7/07 at 8:22am
Did anyone have problems with the PS for the DAC? Im running both the digital section of the DAC and the SPDIF receiver on out2 on the LCDPS and R4 on the PS is turning very hot and smells burned. When running it unloaded its fine and pumping out 7.5V on both channels.
Reply
post #143 of 987
10/7/07 at 9:39am
Hmm, it seems like when the Ballsie with PS is plugged in to the same toroid it gets overloaded. I took them out and its now up and running. Sound fantastic by the way Apparently my 15VA 2x15V toroid is not strong enough for all modules.
Reply
post #144 of 987
10/7/07 at 9:45am
If I understand what you correctly, you have a single 15VA transformer powering both supplies... this is the problem.

The DAC's LCPS (LCDPS) cannot use a center tapped transformer, because the center tap will become the + rail of first supply, and the - rail of the second supply (two distinct supplies on the board). When you connect them to the DAC, the grounds from each supply meet, and you are basically shorting + and -.

The Ballsie's Dual Supply (now LCBPS) does the opposite. The two center secondaries of your dual secondary transformer are joined to form a virtual center tap, and the center (Ground) rail of the supply.

Therefore, when you attach your transformer to both supplies, the Ballsie's power supply is turning your transformer into a center tapped transformer, and that causes a problem on the DAC supply. In the end, you need separate transformers.

The alternative, is use the single transformer to power the Ballsie supply, then use a single set of its secondaries to power both sides of the DAC supply - this will prevent the center tap shorting situation.
Reply
post #145 of 987
10/7/07 at 11:02am
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianDonegan View Post
If I understand what you correctly, you have a single 15VA transformer powering both supplies... this is the problem.

The DAC's LCPS (LCDPS) cannot use a center tapped transformer, because the center tap will become the + rail of first supply, and the - rail of the second supply (two distinct supplies on the board). When you connect them to the DAC, the grounds from each supply meet, and you are basically shorting + and -.

The Ballsie's Dual Supply (now LCBPS) does the opposite. The two center secondaries of your dual secondary transformer are joined to form a virtual center tap, and the center (Ground) rail of the supply.

Therefore, when you attach your transformer to both supplies, the Ballsie's power supply is turning your transformer into a center tapped transformer, and that causes a problem on the DAC supply. In the end, you need separate transformers.

The alternative, is use the single transformer to power the Ballsie supply, then use a single set of its secondaries to power both sides of the DAC supply - this will prevent the center tap shorting situation.
Aha, I see. Didnt realise that this would happen. So the solution for this is to run both secondaries to the Ballsie PS, and then run a single secondary from the Ballsie supply to the DAC supply? But all four power inlets on the DAC supply must be populated I guess, so Ill just jumper between them, right? Hmm, maybe I will run dual transformers anyway, even though the umbilical will be huge Anyway, thanks for the swift reply and thanks for a great sounding DAC. Now I just need the upsampler module
Reply
post #146 of 987
10/12/07 at 10:16am
Ok, decided to go with dual transformers. Dual umbilicals actually looks pretty cool The DAC sounds fantastic with the Ballsie up and and running. Now I just need a bigger case to house all the modules. The Galaxy GX243 is getting kind of cramped.
Reply
post #147 of 987
10/12/07 at 12:32pm
Sounds pretty nice. How is the soundstage?
Reply
post #148 of 987
10/12/07 at 1:51pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by swt61 View Post
Sounds pretty nice. How is the soundstage?
Little early to give a review, but to my ears its very wide and detailed. Im not set up to A/B with and without Ballsie yet, but I will be later when my B22 is built Im listening though a pimped out Pimeta at the moment since my Millet Max is undergoing some modifications. Im betting that it will sound even better with another amp.
Reply
post #149 of 987
10/20/07 at 10:23pm
^^ synchronized bump (or not... must wait 30 seconds between posts?) ^^

any more impressions?

Also, can any of the twisted pear goodies be configured to operate in non-oversampling mode?
Reply
post #150 of 987
10/21/07 at 2:55am
Quote:
Originally Posted by luvdunhill View Post
^^ synchronized bump (or not... must wait 30 seconds between posts?) ^^

any more impressions?

Also, can any of the twisted pear goodies be configured to operate in non-oversampling mode?
No, because the DAC chip that they have used has both the oversampling filter and the DAC itself integrated into a single chip solution. In order to make use of a non-oversampling DAC, you need to use a DAC chip that doesn't have a digital filter integrated. To the best of my knowledge, all current DAC chips have the digital filters integrated, except maybe the AD1853?

Brad
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Discussions › Twisted Pear Audio Opus DAC