Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › Sony MDR-R10 versus L3000, W5000, etc. (photo)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sony MDR-R10 versus L3000, W5000, etc. (photo) - Page 3

post #31 of 196
did you make the money for all that gear,playing competetive fps on that qck+?
post #32 of 196
Good reviews both Mulveling and Elephas.

BTW, when is the next Chicago meet ?
And is anyone bringing an R-10 ?
I promise you I won't ski mask it.
For real though, absolutely must hear them. ...

...Sony MDR-R10 Mk.II as a 20th anniversary ?
post #33 of 196
Or a more appropriate title for a 20th anniv....

... Sony MDR-R20 ...
post #34 of 196
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by purk View Post
Listen to it again. Beside the Qualia, I can't recall any headphone that has more resolution than the R10s. Another great quality of the R10 is its ability to give a sense of space and air on every instrument.
Yes, the R10 has excellent space and air, better than the W5000.

My impression so far is that details are close between the R10 and W5000.

The R10 seems to have many strengths and few weaknesses. It has great details, imaging, soundstage coherency, soundstage size (width + depth), natural and realistic tonality (best I've heard, IMO), superb tonal balance, sense of space, air and separation, and vibrancy, smoothness and liquidity.

The one thing it might lack is the sense of energy and vividness of the L3000. The L3000 has a fullness and body behind it that makes it very powerful-sounding. Combined with its refinement and effortlessness, the L3000 can be a uniquely engaging listening experience.

The R10 matches or even exceeds the L3000's refinement, but it is more reserved and seems to always be holding back. The R10 is like a beautiful, sophisticated, elegant woman with her hair coiffed and ballroom dancing, vs. the L3000's beautiful, sophisticated, athletic woman with her hair flying and club dancing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by strungoutt1 View Post
either way.... so please please compare the three phones well for me
I will try.

I usually listen for a long time before reaching conclusions. I listen to a wide variety of music (including hard rock and metal) and each headphone has to go through several songs of each genre repeatedly, so it takes me a long time.

If you're interested, search for past threads about the R10, L3000 and W5000. I remember many threads with a lot of info about these headphones. There are not many threads about them recently.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadobhuk View Post
did you make the money for all that gear,playing competetive fps on that qck+?
Doesn't anyone think that the QCK+ pad works well as a headphone pad? I considered it was one of my better ideas.
post #35 of 196
Quote:
Yes, the R10 has excellent space and air, better than the W5000.

My impression so far is that details are close between the R10 and W5000.

The R10 seems to have many strengths and few weaknesses. It has great details, imaging, soundstage coherency, soundstage size (width + depth), natural and realistic tonality (best I've heard, IMO), superb tonal balance, sense of space, air and separation, and vibrancy, smoothness and liquidity.

The one thing it might lack is the sense of energy and vividness of the L3000. The L3000 has a fullness and body behind it that makes it very powerful-sounding. Combined with its refinement and effortlessness, the L3000 can be a uniquely engaging listening experience.

The R10 matches or even exceeds the L3000's refinement, but it is more reserved and seems to always be holding back. The R10 is like a beautiful, sophisticated, elegant woman with her hair coiffed and ballroom dancing, vs. the L3000's beautiful, sophisticated, athletic woman with her hair flying and club dancing.
You sum up the R10 very well. With a better amplification, the R10 will sound more powerfull, but still the L3000 will still sound fuller. However, the R10 is just more refine sounding than the L3000 but the L3000 sure have better PRaT and more impact.
post #36 of 196
Very nice!
post #37 of 196
Do you prefer the raptor or the ha5000 for the l3000's?
post #38 of 196
hey man!

Just have to thank you for those photos of beautifull pieces of musical art!

Good listenings!
post #39 of 196
I count 23 headphones in your profile Elephas. Do you enjoy collecting headphones as much as you like listening to them? Has the R10 sated your appetite or is it a perpetual journey?
post #40 of 196
Jealousy is bad. I'm jealous. Your ears must be in heaven... "They don't make 'em like that anymore."
post #41 of 196
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by strungoutt1 View Post
From what you've said already.... Maybe the L3000 still is my headphone of choice.
Soundstage, imaging and details are priorities for me, hence my preference for the W5000 over the L3000 most of the time. I think the W5000's soundstaging and details are better than the L3000's and imaging is close.

The R10 is superb, probably the best I've heard, in these three areas.

The K701 and K1000 are also strong here. The AD2000 and SA5000 are also good, but their soundstaging can't match the others.

For fullness of body, solidity and a unique sense of vividness to the music, the L3000 would be my choice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macwizard View Post
Do you prefer the raptor or the ha5000 for the l3000's?
I use the HA5000 with the L3000. I think it gives the L3000 more air and spaciousness.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJShadow View Post
I count 23 headphones in your profile Elephas. Do you enjoy collecting headphones as much as you like listening to them? Has the R10 sated your appetite or is it a perpetual journey?
Ummmm, er, ah... hey, there are people who have more headphones than I do, and many have electrostats.

I don't consider myself a collector, though there are headphones I don't use much. I'm the unfortunate type who likes almost everything he hears (except Ultrasone 2500 ). And I tell myself that headphones are relatively easy to sell.

I'll still keep listening to other headphones. The R10, L3000 and W5000 are great, but I also like listening to the HD650, K701, RS-1, SA5000, etc. They each have a unique sound and their own strengths and weaknesses. Even the R10 doesn't do everything best in my current system. Maybe with better amplification, and a better source, and...

Quote:
Originally Posted by milkpowder View Post
"They don't make 'em like that anymore."
As good as the R10 and L3000 are, I think the W5000, AD2000 and some other current-production headphones are also good. There's also the GS1000 and Edition 9.

Discontinued headphones are hyped and not worth the time, money and hassle of finding them. They're used, for goodness sake! Used headphones are dirty, smelly and who knows what else (hello nikongod). Forget about them and go for a new Omega II.
post #42 of 196
Elephas, looks like you're in headphone nirvana. I've listen to all those headphones, but I just couldn't get a good fit with the W5000. Though, that wood finish is even more fabulous looking in person and can't forget the killer carrying case. Why the L3000s didn't come with something similar for the life of me I don't know.

What's the serial number on the R10s? It's rarely mentioned, but Sony released two different sounding R10 versions. Do you know which one you've got? The first having better mids and highs, wider soundstage, but bass shy--the latter having better bass at the sacrifice of the soundstage and the other frequencies, IIRC. I've only heard the first version, which I liked a great deal.

The L3000s are really well suited for all things rock related and small jazz ensembles. Yet for big bands and orchestra/classical type music I give concessions to the R10s I heard. I want to hear those R10s again and compare back-to-back against the L3000s--always willing to reassess.

Congrats & Enjoy!
post #43 of 196
Thread Starter 
I agree fit is an issue with the W5000.

Its headbands are flexible and I've bent them the topmost part to increase clamping force. Without this bending they fit very loosely on my head with large gaps at the earpads and could slide off easily.

The L3000 case works well stored in a closet shelf. I like its relative compact form factor, especially vs. the R10's case which is even bigger than the W2002's. I do worry about the velvet cover getting dirty.

This R10 is in the 850's, which should be the early version.

I think I would like a bit more more bass impact and quantity, but wouldn't like to give up any soundstage or air.
post #44 of 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elephas View Post

This R10 is in the 850's, which should be the early version.

I think I would like a bit more more bass impact and quantity, but wouldn't like to give up any soundstage or air.

Your R10 (SN 850) is a newer version. I believe the change in sound signature took place between late SN# 200's to early 300's. Nikongod's R10 (SN#356) sounds identicall to my R10 (SN#996) and Alex's (SN#1200). OTOH, my other R10 (SN#284) is of older sound signature with less bass but more airy and better soundstage.
post #45 of 196
Thread Starter 
My R10 is SN 856.

Ah, so I think the "bassier" version should be a bit more bassy, and there are R10's in existence with a larger soundstage and more air?

Apparently I want more bass and would also like a larger soundstage and air, which can only mean =>

1. Better amp
2. Better source
3. Better power, cables
4. Balanced R10
5. Or switch to a K1000 rig

Aaargh, did I mention I hate Head-Fi?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › Sony MDR-R10 versus L3000, W5000, etc. (photo)