post #31 of 6401
4/20/07 at 4:40pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
I agree with what you say in principle - except the filtering part - if a Sigma11 is built without an onboard xfmr. However, "This is DIY" is justifying trashing at least 1/3 of the Max's board when up until a few weeks ago, the STEPS was the best thing going for any PS, anywhere.
Both of yours and Regal's statements are made without the benefit of testing, or without the benefit of building either one in combination with the Max. You are also both ignoring Amb's own canonical testing of the Millett Hybrid, his own design goals for the Sigma power supplies, and ultimately, his own statement that it won't make a difference on the Millett. By suggesting this, you are implying that a STEPS-like circuit is not even worthy. Perhaps you also aren't considering the ultimate consequence of this line of discussion: you are setting Amb's Sigma11 design directly against Tangent's STEPS design. That is decidedly not cool in DIY, contrary to what you suggest. |
|
Originally Posted by pobrecito
... snip ... Regarding the direct comparison between the power supplies, it is you who is ultimately setting the challenge with such bold statements as "the STEPS was the best thing going for any PS, anywhere."
|

|
Just understand that when you get to higher parts cost and designs the limitations of an LM317 become more apparent. There is nothing wrong with building this as is, but there should be an improvement with a S11. AMB said he can't measure any difference vs the LM317, but you can't measure the benefits of Blackgates either but I'll bet $'s you have used them.
|
| We don't know till someone tries each. |
| Settle down and realize that if you or I owned a $15000 tube amp, we would look to mod it. And where would I start? The power supply. That's ANY design. |
|
Regarding the direct comparison between the power supplies, it is you who is ultimately setting the challenge with such bold statements as "the STEPS was the best thing going for any PS, anywhere."
|
| However, this doesn't mean there is no more room for improvement/tweaking. |
|
some parts of your earlier posts essentially said that if someone was going to bother designing a better Millett than they should have considered a better power supply. only to have someone refer to the end result with a "why did you bother if you're not going to do it well" type of reply.
|


|
Tomb, your build looks very nice. Are you casing in the Hammond? Whenever you get it cased, please post some more ****! I'm pretty set on this for my next project, but we'll see if there are any more changes to the prototype. As of now, do you think there will be any changes for the final board?
|
|
Originally Posted by infinitesymphony
Will there be links to a parts list, an assembly guide, estimated final cost, etc. for this particular variation of the Millett?
Second question... I just built a CMoy; how much more knowledge would it take to assemble one of these? |
|
If anyone would like to join that forum all they have to do is shoot me a PM here.
|
|
Looks awesome !!!! I love my millett hybrid, but really want to build my own from scratch, and this looks great.
Few questions though: 1. If im reading things correct then the boards are still in the prototype phase. How long will these 2nd gen boards be available for and will there be quite a limited run ? |
| 2. Most importantly 'THE SOUND'. My millett has cerafines throughout and 2 BG standars in directly in the path, plus it's running a tread. What sort of sound improvement am i looking at with this rig: |
| Heavily modded marantz cd-63 (probs sounds around the same as $1500-$2000 cd-players) -----------> New MH of course -------------> Grado HF-1 (will eventually get the BEST treatment at headphile like deep woody, blackmaxx recable etc) |