sweet thanks! think i might go for this model
post #46 of 186
1/9/08 at 4:40pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Well, I fear there might have been two sorts of 5520s then - the ones I meant looked like this:
![]() |


|
Go for it! I've been listening to mine the last couple of days, and everytime I listen, I just marvel at how something that I bought for less than $50 sounds better than my digital source that cost 10x more. I can't imagine how more expensive vinyl rigs must sound.
If it wasn't for the convenience and cost of CDs, I'd go strictly vinyl. |
|
For those looking for sub-$100 turntables, buy locally and save yourself the shipping cost and possible grief from shipping damage.
|


|
what order the list is in? Higher model numbers are at the bottom, but does this mean they are later models or higher end or a combination of the two?
|


|
Any thoughts on the Garrard Zero 100 S? I've been reading round about it's (nearly) unique arm and that sound promising. Sloppy highs but solid bass sounds good (review), but I've only got distant memories of my mum playing classical vinyls many years ago to compare to. There are no useful shops in my town to go and test stuff so I have no choice by trusting those in the know!
|
|
I am young enough to have grown up with CD's but on hearing the new Metallica album was shocked how bad they are getting with the "volume war". ...
|
|
From reading the duals don't do bass as well as some, so I'll probably avoid them (I'm not a bass head by any means, but it's not an area that should be lacking IMO)...
|
|
Any thoughts on the Garrard Zero 100 SI'll have a read about the Thorens next, thanks for the tip. Would going higher mean needing a more expensive phono stage? Might be worth spending more to begin with than buying twice...
|