Quote:
Originally Posted by stormcloud 
This thread has been most informative, went through all 144 pages and I can tell you sometimes it makes my head spin. That argument on shorting the 22uF coupling caps vs bypassing them especially.
I've got a question for bichu/germanium or anyone else that can shed some light into it :
Based on general opinion, electrolytic caps are bad for coupling in the direct signal path. Assuming there is a DC offset and one rules in favour against shorting/forming a wire bridge, would a straight forward replacement of those 22uF electrolytic caps with a polyester or polypropylene (values between 0.47uF - 1.5uF) work?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stormcloud 
Thanks for that confirmation. It's been a long time from the EE I took at university, I'm just slowly getting back into the scene. Re-learning all this back is fairly exciting. It's perverse, I used to hate analog/power electronics 
So it looks like I'm pretty much stuck to 22uF (or higher till 220uF) value for a straight forward replacement. Loosely basing the freq response on the simple high pass filter below :
f = 1 / 2 * 3.1415 * R * C
f = low freq cut-off (at 3dB)
R = sum of impedance
C = coupling capacitance
- am I correct to assume that bypassing generally decreases impedance, increases the low feq cut-off, but gives you a (freq dependent) better mid-range and high-end?
- any good suggestions for decent polyester/polypropylene caps 22uF - 220uF?
- if using electrolytic cap, it's obvious that super low ESR caps like the OSCON offers better benefit than the standard cap
-------------------- updated :
Went back and trawled to post #1312 from bichi. Looks like 33uF is a good value.
Looks like most (if not all) poly caps with the above sort of value are either uneconomical or simply too big a monster to mount on the X-Fi or both. I guess Blackgate N/NX bipolar is the next best bet ... oh well ..... gosh ... did I just answer my own questions? lol
|
stormcloud,
- yep, you may have answered your own questions...
- assuming you don't want to hang large film-type caps, electrolytics, tantalums, MLCC (X7R, NPO) are not as bad as most think.
- since you mention 22uf coupling cap, I assume you have a SB0460.
- generally, lower the coupling cap value, less LF/bass response.
- correct, 33uf seems to be the optimal value with Panasonic "S" SMT capacitors, for my playback system and tastes.
- might consider socketing and trying different types, adjusting value/type to your personal tastes.
- agreed, good quality "non-polar" might be worth a try.
- I would not rule out tantalum or MLCC X7R capacitor types, regardless of conventional thinking about coupling-caps types.
- beware it is a differential 2-pole active low-pass filter, after the DAC, and simple static formulas may not be appropriate.
- you also mention taking university EE and might be interested in simulators, which allow easy modeling, relative to performance.
- (links below)
- SB0460 use small components, difficult to trace, determine values with parts "in-circuit" and load into a simulator.
I purchased Germanium's blown card (SB0550), have traced the differential 2-pole LPF circuit.
- parts are larger and SMT resistor values are labeled.
- configured circuit for Texas Instruments TINA simulator. (*.TSC file, and TINA simulator, links below)
- might be of interest to install TINA and play with coupling cap values and see how they affect frequency response, noise, S/N, etc. (painless, push-button AC/DC, Bode, FFT analysis compared to the old days)
- Texas Instruments Active Filter Design, FilterPro is another "fun" application to play with.
- have experimented with tantalum and currently playing with MLCC caps, X7R, 22uf 16vdc (high volumetric efficiency)
- will post MLCC cap results in a week or so...
- results so far: "sounds more like wire, as opposed to a capacitor..."
- TDK MLCC, SMT, PN: C3225X7R1C226M; 22uf @ 16vdc (might want to give these a go on your SB0460)
- added: Wolfson coupling cap and AVX tant vs. MLCC whitepaper links
REF:
Texas Instruments TINA v7.0:
SPICE-Based Analog Simulation Program - TINA-TI - TI Tool Folder
SB0550 2-Pole Active LPF Circuit File for TI TINA v7.0:
X-FI-MOD-097b - eSnips, share anything
Texas Instruments Active Filter Design, FilterPro:
Active Filter Design Application - FILTERPRO - TI Software Folder
TDK, MLCC, PN: C3225X7R1C226M; 22uf @ 16vdc @ Mouser:
http://www.mouser.com/catalog/631/679.pdfAdded REFs:
Recommended Output Filters for Wolfson Audio DACs:
http://www.wolfsonmicro.com/uploads/...en/WAN0171.pdf
Comparison of MLCC and Tantalum Capacitors:
http://www.avxcorp.com/docs/techinfo/mlc-tant.pdf