Got my ES-1 today. I definatly am enjoying my new setup. Source will be done in about a week and I will be in a whole new level of audio. 
-Alex-

-Alex-
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!

|
And all of those were in a different housing with different cables and different amps?
|
|
What does the 202 sounds like with the 007t?
Andre Jute Visit Jute on Amps at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/ "wonderfully well written and reasoned information for the tube audio constructor" John Broskie TubeCAD & GlassWare "an unbelievably comprehensive web site containing vital gems of wisdom" Stuart Perry Hi-Fi News & Record Review |

|
I totally disagree! I have the electrostatic Jecklins since 1990 or so, and kept them in good shape. I preferred them over the AKG K1000 (I sold that one) because the Jecklin has all the electrostatic finesse that I lurve so much, and the K1000 just doesn't come close to that. I use the Jecklin alongside a Stax SR-X + SRD-7. The sound of the Jecklins is of course way less upfront and much less headphone-like than the SR-X; the soundfield they produce is very spacious, something between listening to my Quad esl63's and the Stax 'phones. Very comfy too!
|
|
I bought the Jecklins in 1990 after comparing them carefully against the Lambda (don't know which version was in the shops then), driven by some sort of solid state Stax amp. I chose the Jecklin because of the large sound and sound stage, and for its potential to go loud without stress. I found the Lambda's thin and bloodless, with a narrow, sort of cramped sound stage. I've been happy with the Jecklins ever since. Three ýears or so back I compared them again against a Lambda (don't remember which one) via a Stax 303. Same result. Can't say the Lambda bass was any better. I do remember listening to a SR-X in 1977 or so. I coveted those, but couldn't afford them then, and in 1990 they were nowhere to be seen any more.
|

|
Gawd, these things are addicting... just the thought of those filaments cooking alone downstairs, I'm up and back at the desk. Broke out a dual-media disk I picked up recently of Steely Dan Gaucho.
I must've heard "Hey Nineteen" eleventy-million times by now, but I think I may have just heard it for the first time. The thing about these Omegas is I'm having to re-educate myself about how to listen. The Lambdas are just so forward in comparison. There is something of "letting the sound happen" that I'm having to learn to do here. Gaucho is one of those planned studio albums that has been carefully mixed together to yield certain effects. The Omegas dissect that planning with a fine edged scalpel. It's almost like three or four different albums going on at the same time in this headspace. You've got Fagen pulling solo duties in this sort of center spotlight down under me (picture being up in the lighting scaffolding, maybe thirty feet above Donald). Then the chorus is surrounding me left and right almost beside me up here. Over to the left, the rhythm guitar is maintaining an harmonic counterpoint that's somehow divorced from the whole soundstage and in its own space, really. "The Cuervo Gold, the fine Columbian..." ![]() |
|
Identical amps and cables and as housing is something you can't do anything about (unless you want to DIY) you have to treat it as a constant. I repeat: stats are far from necessarily being sonically neutral........there is as much variation with them as with dynamics.
|
|
Gawd, these things are addicting... just the thought of those filaments cooking alone downstairs, I'm up and back at the desk.
|
|
Having both an ES-1 and a Blue Hawaii surely can't be legal in Texas. You better move up to Utah, Alex.
|
