Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › The Stax thread (New)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Stax thread (New) - Page 53

post #781 of 18422
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duggeh View Post
^ egads a slope filter switch. QUADtastic.

You just won that then Carl?
I did. That baby is from 1966. The plan is to mod it until it sounds good by modern standards, but it ain't gonna be cheap. Still, it's suitably rare and heteroclite.


Anyone have any suggestions for audio modders worthy of such a project?


Quote:
Originally Posted by spritzer View Post
I was going to bid on that but backed out. Congrats Carl.
That would have made for an epic bidding war, especially considering how high my max bid was. I've been hunting one of Stax's all-tube amps for months now and this is the first one I've seen.
post #782 of 18422
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferrstein View Post
I'm actually thinking of populating the circuit board with components to create a normal bias output as well... making this unit an SRD7 MKII.
The SRD-7 Pro uses a voltage doubling ladder. If you check the voltage at each diode in the ladder the voltage will go down as you go down the ladder. You can probably find a voltage close to 230 for the low bias. All you need to do is switch the wire from the last diode to the diode further down the ladder.

Audiod
post #783 of 18422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl View Post
I did. That baby is from 1966. The plan is to mod it until it sounds good by modern standards, but it ain't gonna be cheap. Still, it's suitably rare and heteroclite.


Anyone have any suggestions for audio modders worthy of such a project?



That would have made for an epic bidding war, especially considering how high my max bid was. I've been hunting one of Stax's all-tube amps for months now and this is the first one I've seen.
We would have ripped out each others throats in that bidding war

I bowed out for the simple reason that I'm always more interested in the phones them selves rather then the amps driving them so it should go to a better home.

As modders go RAM are supposed to be very good but some of their stuff is a bit out there. On the other hand they've got the main points right, paper in oil caps, silver transformers and cotton covered silver wire.
post #784 of 18422
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyre View Post
Interesting. Ferrstein, could you post some higher-res shots of the top and bottom of the bias supply? I'd like to replicate it in a pcb layout.
The best I could do with my crappy camera is this shot:



If you want to see higher res photos of both the front and back, check here:

http://www.servodrivenacoustats.com/SRD7CBRear.jpg

http://www.servodrivenacoustats.com/SRD7CBFront.jpg

http://www.servodrivenacoustats.com/SRD7CBFrontb.jpg

I hope this gives you some idea what you need to do. It is actually a quite simple circuit board.
post #785 of 18422
I had a quick question. J-Pak advised me in a separate thread to reserve judgment on the Sigma Pros until I heard them out of a Pro Energizer. I didn't want to hijack that thread, so I guess I'll ask my newbie question here. Sorry about that J-Pak.

What exactly is meant by the term pro bias? I thought that a "pro" jack was basically a pro bias output. Does pro bias refer to a large voltage and not the jack type? (400 V+ for example)

Thanks so much!
post #786 of 18422
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veniogenesis View Post
I had a quick question. J-Pak advised me in a separate thread to reserve judgment on the Sigma Pros until I heard them out of a Pro Energizer. I didn't want to hijack that thread, so I guess I'll ask my newbie question here. Sorry about that J-Pak.

What exactly is meant by the term pro bias? I thought that a "pro" jack was basically a pro bias output. Does pro bias refer to a large voltage and not the jack type? (400 V+ for example)

Thanks so much!
He simply meant that if you're going to go the transformer box route, don't use a low bias (230v) transformer box to drive them as the Sigma Pros are pro bias (580v) headphones.
post #787 of 18422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veniogenesis View Post
I had a quick question. J-Pak advised me in a separate thread to reserve judgment on the Sigma Pros until I heard them out of a Pro Energizer. I didn't want to hijack that thread, so I guess I'll ask my newbie question here. Sorry about that J-Pak.

What exactly is meant by the term pro bias? I thought that a "pro" jack was basically a pro bias output. Does pro bias refer to a large voltage and not the jack type? (400 V+ for example)

Thanks so much!
Pro bias means the amp/energizer will provide something close to 580VDC that is transferred to the diaphragm of the headphones. Any Pro output (5-pins only, not six) will provide that. A normal bias output (6-pin) will only provide 230V and that is not enough to adequately drive something like Sigma Pros. Of course the amplification of the sound signal is another matter entirely, clearly not all amps or energizers are created equal and the voltage swing on the signal lines can vary significantly between them without any relation to the bias voltage.

Since J-Pak especially mentioned a Pro energizer though, he may be referring to a transfomer box only such as a SRD-7 Pro, SRD-7 Mk2 or Illusion ESC-1001.
post #788 of 18422
Ah, I see. Thanks for the help everyone!
post #789 of 18422
Thread Starter 
I'm guessing that this is the SRA-7S's output stage



In fact, the seem to have circuit diagrams and scope readings for several electrostatic headphone amps including the KGSS.

http://wiki.livedoor.jp/funya2420/d/SRA-7S
post #790 of 18422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Quichotte View Post
Thanks a lot. I was asking because my 303's seem to sound significantly better after playing some music (about 30-45 min. I think), even if they were connected to the amp turned on a few hours before. At first they sound somewhat lacklustre and boring and only after a while all the details start to integrate together nicely and the sound seems to gain some brilliance and some, I don't know how to say, the equivalent of the depth of an engraving - as opposed to the initial "shallow" sound.
Sounds true of both my Stax gear (Sigmas, Lambda Nova, 404, SR001) and my Koss ESP 950. I assume that it takes a while for the stators and diaphragm to get fully charged even though the amp may have been on. Also, for the Lambda at least, the ears pads get warmed up and a bit sweaty and seal better around the ear.

It is of course possible that the rest of the equipment is undergoing similar warm-ups.
post #791 of 18422
After looking at the SRD-7 Pro schematic and looking at the circuit board pictures (courtesy of ferrstein) that shows parts missing (probably were used in the mkII) I drew a schematic that should be the bias supply for the SRD-7mkII with both Low and High bias voltages. I don't know the value of R103 but it should be the same as R104. Z101 is a BiDirectional Zener diode with a breakdown voltage of 90-110 volts. D101 to D106 are 1 amp, 400 volt Silicon diodes.
I am working on a parts layout now.

AudioD



If I tap off the rungs of the voltage doubling ladder in the SRD-7 Pro bias supply I could have 5 different bias voltages from 230 to 580. I would replace the front panel switch with a 5 position switch. Now I could use my SRX’s and SR-5’s with a bias boost without going all the way to 580. Cool!
post #792 of 18422
Thread Starter 
Shouldn't the HV supply be 580v, not 480v?
post #793 of 18422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl View Post
Shouldn't the HV supply be 580v, not 480v?
Carl,
Oops... Typo. Fixed.
Thanks,
AudioD
post #794 of 18422
Quote:
After looking at the SRD-7 Pro schematic and looking at the circuit board pictures (courtesy of ferrstein) that shows parts missing (probably were used in the mkII) I drew a schematic that should be the bias supply for the SRD-7mkII with both Low and High bias voltages. I don't know the value of R103 but it should be the same as R104. Z101 is a BiDirectional Zener diode with a breakdown voltage of 90-110 volts. D101 to D106 are 1 amp, 400 volt Silicon diodes.
I am working on a parts layout now.
When I get a spare moment I'll open up my SRD-7 Mk2 and take a look at the parts values. (Photos when I get my camera back too). The photos ferrstein posted look a lot more readable than my SRD-7 so hopefully the Mk2 will be nice to follow too.

One thing I notice in that circuit is the center tap which I assume is there for the purpose of creating a ground reference shared between the bias supply and the audio signal. In my SRD-7 Mk2 I get some 50Hz mains hum that is quite noticeable with my SR-X Mk3 (The O2s don't seem to be efficient enough for it to be very noticeble). There is no direct connection to the ground in the mains plug, it's only got two prongs. Considering these center taps are the only place the audio and bias signals interact I'm assuming that the hum is creeping into the signal through here. Is there a way I can minimise this? Perhaps running a line from the mains ground to this spot (i.e. on the center tap PCB traces) in the circuit to actually make it a true reference to ground?

On another semi-related note, I am planning to build my own custom transformer box along the lines of Andrea Ciuffoli's circuit but with a substantially higher ratio for the two signal transformers so it can be used with lower power amplifiers (under 10W). Now having more turns will increase the capacitance. I'm wondering if this will have any effect other than reduced high frequency performance? I'm thinking that as long as the transformer can maintain good performance (under +/- 1db) to near 25Khz or better this is not a concern. If it was a problem it would seem I'd have to scrap the idea and settle for a lower ratio.
post #795 of 18422
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferrstein View Post
Hello, just wanted to give a quick update on the scary Ebay auction I had with the SRD7 Pro (Ebay canceled the fellow's user account after I pad for the unit). Well, it showed up, but it had a bit of shipping damage due to a loose transformer (the bolt was missing)
Great to see that the SRD-7 Pro showed up! Even if it was partly broken...

But if you did not intend to use the speaker/earspeaker switch anyway, it might not have been to bad. Since bypassing the switch can only lead to positive results sound wise.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › The Stax thread (New)