Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › The Stax thread (New)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Stax thread (New) - Page 30

post #436 of 18421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl View Post
They may have five pins, but they still have six wires.
Thanks! Same colours?
post #437 of 18421
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JecklinStax View Post
Thanks! Same colours?
Open it up and have a look.
post #438 of 18421
Quote:
Originally Posted by basb View Post
Thanks for your post. Now, because I'm going to try the cyber 30 anyway with the srd-7 pro once it arrives:

Because a low powered transformer output tube amp and a stax transformer obviously weren't designed with each other in mind, is there any risk of damage when using the to together?

I guess there is not much danger to it, but a definitive answer would be nice for anyone interested in tube amps and stax.
There should be no problem. But remember that a 3.5 watt amp driving a SRD will probably only provide a max of 150 volts to the stats. Most SRM's can deliver between 300-400 volts. Some of the aftermarket direct drive amps can deliver as high as 1500 volts. Your little amp may clip easily. If you hear any clipping back off on the volume.
post #439 of 18421
Quote:
Originally Posted by JecklinStax View Post
Spritzer, how does that translate into recabling an SR-X with a 5-pin-plug extension cord? I think I need to solder three wires into each driver (+ and - for signal, and one for bias), and I hope the extension cord provides those six connections, similarly colour-coded as in the old cable. Otherwise I'd get hopelessly confused !
With the 5 pin standard both diaphragms are connected to the right bias pin. The extension cord is a flat 6 core cable and there is no color coding. Stax doesn't use double insulation like Sennheiser did with their stat line. It's best to use a continuity meter to check what wire is what and reuse the crimp connectors that connect too the drivers. You can solder but you have to be very careful with excess flux and castoff.
post #440 of 18421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl View Post
Here's something interesting I've come across in my travels through the aether. No idea how good it is, but it does appear to warrent further investigation.



Masters BA-215TM/STAX

It's a 15Wpc speaker amp slash electrostatic headphone amp. Tube complement is the fairly venerable 12AU7->6SN7->EL34, similar to what the ES-1 uses. Price is Y168,000 which is about US$1450. Anyone feel like taking one for the team?
That looks a whole lot like a Dynaco ST-70, with a small gain stage (preamp) added upfront. Interesting...
post #441 of 18421
WoW

i am like forever indebted to you guys

i've recently been getting into classical music - symphonies and orchestral suites.

after getting my first electrostat rig and upgrading my dynamic rig

the electrostat rig is simply mind bogglingly worlds ahead of the dynamic system for clarity, detail and definition in classical music. i simply cannot listen to classical on my dynamics without feeling like i am in my car listening to its stock speakers losing ever last glimmer of detail and finesse that is embodied by well produced/recorded classical

listening barber's adagio for strings, mahler's symphony #5 and rodrigo's concerto aranjeuz are like a completely different experience to me, in particular is string instruments and complex passages is where the stats truly shine, effortless in presenting the detail

my appreciation for the skills of of the musicians is greatly increased as i can hear that much more of their performance that it astounds me, dynamics sounded nice but amalgamated the sounds all together so much i really couldn't hear each strut of the violin strings and pause taken before each trumpet blow, just incredible. my respect for musos has gone up 1000%

i think for piano, in particularly beethoven's moonlight sonata i think the dynamics have a bit more impact and visceral thud and warmth...

argh, and don't even get my started on vocal/operatics...
post #442 of 18421
There are so many variants of Stax energizers & amps around. Just curious if the improvements of the 006t or the 006tII are significant over the older T1, T1s variants.
post #443 of 18421
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaloS View Post
Hrm, to join the club for a second time, (after using sr-005a and finding them having no superiority over hd595), I just for the hell of it bought sr-84 + t-amp.
Welcome back!
May you have a more enjoying stay this time...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl View Post
Here's something interesting I've come across in my travels through the aether. No idea how good it is, but it does appear to warrent further investigation.


Masters BA-215TM/STAX
Nice find!
I sure would be interested in more information about this amplifier. Especially if someone have ever listened to one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by basb View Post
Now, because I'm going to try the cyber 30 anyway with the srd-7 pro once it arrives
Looks like a great versatile amplifier.
I think its 2 x 3.5 watts might be a bit on the low side for powering a pair of Stax phones through an SRD-7 Pro. Keep us posted when you have listened to it..
post #444 of 18421

Stax non pro Sigmas and the Stax Intergrated Amp 125

Well, going to the NYC show in Bayside, NY got me going a little bit. You see, like all of you out there, I am also interested in great sound and may be a little to willing to pay $ too much to get it. So the next day, I went down to Lyric Hi Fi on Madison Avenue and saw a used Stax Intergrated Amp 125. I previously had been using a Stax SRM1/MK2 to run my two pair of Stax Sigma Low Bias headphones. I thought I was completely happy with this set up. I ask the Salesman, Bob, what he was asking for the used Stax 125 amp. He responded a certain number $ and I negotiated $50 off of that price. We both were happy. So when I got home and hooked them up to my headphones and my favorite internet radio program, Hearts of Space, I was completely flawed by the sound produced by the used Stax 125 amp. To put it mildly, the Stax 125 amp running both of my Stax Low Bias Sigmas were an significant improvement of the SRM1/mk2s. Dare I say that they sounded better than my Stax Omega 2s with my SRM007t tubed amp. Oh my god; is this allowed to be said on Headfi.org. Well, that was totally my impression.
So, if you happen to have a old pair of non pro sigmas around- try using the 125 amp as see if you agree. I will state that I am of sound mind and body when I say this. Enjoy the day. Scottsmrnyc
post #445 of 18421
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by krmathis View Post
Nice find!
I sure would be interested in more information about this amplifier. Especially if someone have ever listened to one.
Doubtful. I don't think anyone in Japan even has one.
post #446 of 18421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottsmrnyc View Post
To put it mildly, the Stax 125 amp running both of my Stax Low Bias Sigmas were an significant improvement of the SRM1/mk2s. Dare I say that they sounded better than my Stax Omega 2s with my SRM007t tubed amp. Oh my god; is this allowed to be said on Headfi.org. Well, that was totally my impression.
Scottsmrnyc
I take it that your talking about a SRA-12s Stax amp? I love my 12s. I prefer it to my SRM-1 mkII pro on the low bias Lambda, SRX-III and SR-5. The 12s has a mellower tonal balance than the SRM. The bass is more pronounced and seems deeper. The midrange is a little more laid back. The 12s is also well designed and made. All the separate circuits are on plug in cards with gold contacts. It can also be used as a passive or active line stage with pre outs. It has a good MM phono stage and a tape loop. I have a Behringer EQ in the loop. It gets quite hot so I have a low speed fan on top of it. The SRA-12s was the preamp to drive the DA-80 and DA-300 class A amps back in the late 70's. The owners manual shows the whole system including the big Stax full range ESL loudspeakers. If you ever want to sell it I have a friend that would buy it. Enjoy!

AudioD


post #447 of 18421
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaloS View Post
Hrm, to join the club for a second time, (after using sr-005a and finding them having no superiority over hd595), I just for the hell of it bought sr-84 + t-amp.

Quite impressive for something for the 80s and a total price that would just get me sr-003 alone >.< The timbre of classical guitar on recordings that I have is extremely natural and real...just fish they had a bit more bass xD Makes for a decent temporary compliment to hd595 (hd595 rock, sr-84 for classical).

Anyone know if a better speaker amplifer than the t-amp will grant them more bass? I am kinda entertaining myself by keeping this setup mostly vintage, don't feel like adding a modern stax amp to this. Plus a speaker amplifier is something I intend on having and using in the long run.
If you want a decent little amp with more bass output, either the Trends t-amp @ $100 or the Firestone Audio Big Joe @ $210should do the trick as neither have the rolloff in the bass that the SI t-am does. I imagine the bass increase will still be small doe to the phones limited response down there.
post #448 of 18421

Correction- Stax Intergrated Amp 12S not 125

I just didn't have my glasses on to see the numbers on the unit. Enjoy Scottsmrnyc
post #449 of 18421

Carl Doubtful! What is doubtful?? I just bought one at

At Lyric HiFi on Madison Ave and E83 in Manhattan, nyc. They were on the used equipment shelf tagged at $300. I negotiated the price to $250. I guess I was in the right place at the right time. Enjoy Scottsmrnnyc.
post #450 of 18421
He was talking about the Masters Stax amp pictured above.
Nice find for both of you though.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › The Stax thread (New)