Quote:
|
I'm planning on using silver wire, tantalum resistors, oil/wax caps, high quality switches and possibly replacing the transformer.
We're all madmen here. |
Can the transformer be configured for other primary voltages?
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
I'm planning on using silver wire, tantalum resistors, oil/wax caps, high quality switches and possibly replacing the transformer.
We're all madmen here. |
|
It's always nice to know your not alone...
Can the transformer be configured for other primary voltages? |

|
The stepdown could be seen as extra protection if something goes wrong. It will burst into flames long before anything else.
|


|
Some initial (big grain 'o salt) impressions on the Lambda Woody:
Bass: more pronounced than stock, definitely punchier Mids: More forward, less smooth, but seems like more texture Highs: Not rolled off, more like less accentuation, sparkle still there though headstage: less expansive than stock, but still wide, separation is a bit more pronounced These are just impressions from about 2 hours listening and will change a great deal I imagine. When I first put them on I was a bit dissapointed, but after warming them up and extended listening they quickly changed my mind. I'm not ready to sell the stock pair or the signature I have, but these are quite good and I'll probably bring them to the MD crew this weekend to get some outside opinions. |
|
I've been pretty dissapointed lately at the cost of the old Lambda's, considering that their modern counterparts can be bought new for about the same or less than the old ones.
|
|
Hmm, that's seems like a semi-decent price. But the SR-202 can be bought for $280, and it's not over 20 years old.
|
|
That's good to hear. I've been pretty dissapointed lately at the cost of the old Lambda's, considering that their modern counterparts can be bought new for about the same or less than the old ones.
I've started to wonder if everyone might be suffering from a case of groupthink. People say that they prefer the old Lambda's to the new, and then that idea becomes self-reinforcing as it influences everyone else's perceptions. I've personally never heard either the new or old Lambda's, yet I already have the perception ingrained in my head that the modern Lambda's are flawed and inaccurate, while the old Lambda's are the ultimate Stax bested only by the O2. |

|
Hmm, that's seems like a semi-decent price. But the SR-202 can be bought for $280, and it's not over 20 years old.
And I bet that the person you got in from ships only within Europe. Any Stax auctions that ship to the US usually go higher. |
)
|
Wow, this I just don't understand. To my ears, the only viable comparison to the Lambda Pro's are the 404's. As I've said before, in my system the Lambda Pro/SRD-7 Pro combination blew away the SRM-313/SR-303 setup, so much so that I just happily sold the latter for exactly what I paid for the former. I've never heard the 202, but nothing I've read would lead me to believe that they could compete with the 404 or Lambda Pro's. Considering the current market, $270 plus shipping is a great price for the LP's. While it's all well and good for some people to keep posting about how cheap the vintage stuff was a year or two ago, that's entirely irrelevant today when someone's just trying to build a system that will give them the best sound for the buck.
There have been quite a few posts recently in this and other threads about how over-priced the Lambda Pro's and/or pro energiser boxes are. Frankly, I just don't get it the logic, because those same posters say that given the right amp, the SRD-7 Pro will blow away the SRM-313. They then go on to say that a reasonable price for the SRD-7 Pro is less than $100. Clearly there's something wonky about that. "Group think" works both ways, the only reasonable thing for someone to do is just let their own ears dictate what the appropriate amount would be to spend on the gear that wows them. It doesn't matter to me at all whether the gear is over 20 years old or brand new. I hope that headfier's are experienced enough to just spend their money on whether gives them the best sound, without relying on other people's value judgments about what the "proper" prices should be. |

|
Hmm, that's seems like a semi-decent price. But the SR-202 can be bought for $280, and it's not over 20 years old.
|

|
Going by market price that Head-fi has set isn't the best idea. This Stax fad will blow over like it has done in the past and then people are stuck with stuff they can't sell. You have to remember this happened on Headwize before there was even Head-fi and then the prices lowered and Stax was and an obscure brand for crazy people that didn't believe Sennheiser did in fact create the sun. The problem is with the people that buy Stax, because 90% of the are so happy with their systems that they leave the forums. It is not for be to stop people for paying what they think this stuff is worth but I urge people not to pay to much because they will loose the difference if they don't like what they bought. The SRD-7 with a good amp will beat the 313 in some areas and that's fine but I can't see the reason with paying 200$ for just the adapter because you might like the cleaner cut sound of the direct drive amp more.
Buying 20 year old equipment is never a good idea unless you know how to fix it if something goes wrong. Stax has made some horrible design blunders over the years but there are very few in the Lambda line and those are mostly on the arc assembly and how it connects with the earcup. If your 500$ vintage Pro's break and you can't fix it, it will cost a huge sum to repair and you will get the new drivers so unless you really like the old headband design it wasn't the smartest buy you've ever made. I don't want this to happen to anyone but it has happened and it will happen to some of you. Hell it has happened to me enough times... ![]() |