Quote:
Originally Posted by randerson3024 
I have been constantly upgrading for the last couple of years. I have a strange job that allows me to save a bit of money. I am trying to finish the upgrades before I move back home in a couple of years.
|
Lucky!

Quote:
Originally Posted by randerson3024 
The 3.6R's do about 90% of what the 20.1's do. It his a hard to decision to spend that much more for an extra 10% in performance.
|
True, and the 20.1 cost, what, three times as much? They do look much bigger though. Any reason why you decide to go with ribbon and not electrostatic? Anyhow, you have some liking for non-conventional means of sound production

Quote:
Originally Posted by randerson3024 
The best speakers I have ever heard were the MBL 101E's. This was, however, in Singapore with about $200,000 of MBL electronics driving them. I am not sure my amps would do drive them, and so far, I have been very happy with them. I'm not so certain I can swing another 20 grand for amps, or if I want to. The Wilsons are very efficient for speakers of thier size, so they are the likely candidates.
|
Do they still sell the Wilson Maxx? I thought the X-2s were the top-of-the-line or is the Maxx a custom-made product? [I'm sorry... my mind isn't working. Ignore my first two questions] Likewise, do you know what the MBL model above the 101E is called? I've seen pictures of it in trade-shows. They're twin towered per ch. One of the tower has a full height omni-direction-whatever-its-called-carbon-fibre-thing whereas the other tower is dynamic (iirc).
With 20k, you could buy some fancy Mark Levinson or Halcro amplification

That's a nice thought isn't it
