Quote:
Originally Posted by Wmcmanus 
I guess I'm picking your brain a little bit because you seem to have more direct experience with them than I do
|
If this is true it's only because of all that other gear you have!

I think if the L3000 had a larger soundstage and more air I would prefer it over the W5000. Imaging is close, but I feel the W5000's is more precise, more 3D, and better in combination with its larger soundstage.
The L3000 seems to sacrifice air and space for fullness and body. The L3000 makes the music sound robust, with a unique sense of realism and power behind each note. It would be my choice for a newbie who wanted to know how different a headphone can sound from generic earbuds. Listening to it is a more intense experience than the more ethereal-sounding W5000.
I'm more of an airhead than basshead and value airyness, soundstage and imaging more than body, solidity, bass quality and bass impact. I'm also a bit of a detail freak and the W5000 seems more resolving than the L3000. With the W5000's larger soundstage, precise imaging and notes separation and better sense of 3D space and air, it becomes my favorite despite the L3000's amazing bass texture, PRaT and superior sense of weight and body.
I agree the AD2000 has excellent air. It's different than the K701's, for example, which can sometimes seem overly light and fluffy to me. It is more realistic and seems more like the sound is traveling though air and space as opposed to being generated in a sterile vacuum. It sounds exceptional with most pop and electronica music with female vocals such as Goldfrapp and can often be more enjoyable than either the W5000 or L3000.