Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphone Amps › Review: Portable amp roundup! 56 portable amps reviewed and compared - FINAL update 12-20-10 added RSA SR-71B
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Review: Portable amp roundup! 56 portable amps reviewed and compared - FINAL update 12-20-10... - Page 150  

post #2236 of 3234
1/5/09 at 11:55am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by a_tumiwa View Post
this topic need to be upgraded, where is the topic starter ...
?????

I am the topic starter - no clue what you mean, though...
post #2237 of 3234
1/5/09 at 1:13pm
42 amps instead of 37, I suppose
post #2238 of 3234
1/5/09 at 1:13pm
Sorry, 47
post #2239 of 3234
1/5/09 at 2:01pm
Thread Starter 
Ahhh...for some reason, when i try to change the thread topic, it does not change. Not sure why. If there is a mod who happens to be reading this, and wants to change the thread name to 47 amps, please feel free
post #2240 of 3234
1/5/09 at 3:48pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skylab View Post
I don't expect us to agree on everything, although I think in the main, we actually do. I spent some extra time with the NuForce just to be sure of my findings, since jvlgato also liked the NuForce more than I did. This is what I thought of it. YMMV





Nice having you over, and I was glad to get a chance to listen to the DACs with your set-up. I didn't feel that the DACs changed my feelings about the amps much versus the line inputs, although i do think the NuForce sounds better via USB than via analog.
My understanding is that the Nufore also sounded better to you as first impression and it was as you spent more time with it that you determined where it could be improved.

I regret that I didn't spend enough time with the Nuforce via analog input, so the USB DAC that I used most of the time could explain why I liked it a little more than you.
post #2241 of 3234
1/5/09 at 4:12pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadphoneAddict View Post
My understanding is that the Nufore also sounded better to you as first impression and it was as you spent more time with it that you determined where it could be improved.
Not exactly. Via the USB DAC, and via unfamiliar headphones, and on just a quick listen, I thought it sounded OK. But when put through a level-matched, comparative test with my own headphones, I was less than impressed.
post #2242 of 3234
1/6/09 at 6:07am
I felt the same as reviewed by Skylab for D3. When I listen the D3, something is lacking compare to Mustang. Treble and bass just not enough for my taste. But no doubt, D3 is good for value.

Just wonder any similar review done for full size amp? It's an enjoyment to read. Good afford by Skylab.
post #2243 of 3234
1/6/09 at 5:05pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadphoneAddict View Post
The D2000/5000 most certainly benefit from a good amp.

If you are using your PC as your main source, I would pair your D5000 with any of the top DAC amps like Pico, Predator or 3MOVE. All of them have a DAC that sounds better than the one on my Macbook or iMac 20" Intel. The D2000 and the MD5000 DE that I reviewed do very well from Pico and Predator, and I have tried the D2000 with 3MOVE and they do very well together also. But vs the D5000 my D2000 have slightly recessed mids which the 3MOVE helps to fill in a little (Didn't have 3MOVE to try with the borrowed modded D5000).

My personal choice for D5000 would be the Pico since the DAC is top notch and it gives them a very nice wide open soundstage with plenty of current output to drive low impedance phones without getting too sloppy. However, the 3MOVE offers the ability to run entirely from USB power without needing to keep it plugged into the wall or to keep a battery in it that will run down.
Since the DAC makes the biggest difference, should I wait for the Pico DAC-only and see how that performs? I don't mind shelling out for the Pico DAC+AMP, but if the amp aspect does not make a marked difference, then it does not seem worth it. I also have a pair of Westone 3s which I use along with the D5000s, so I really don't need an amp at all?
post #2244 of 3234
1/6/09 at 8:07pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by tseryan View Post
Since the DAC makes the biggest difference, should I wait for the Pico DAC-only and see how that performs? I don't mind shelling out for the Pico DAC+AMP, but if the amp aspect does not make a marked difference, then it does not seem worth it. I also have a pair of Westone 3s which I use along with the D5000s, so I really don't need an amp at all?
Well, you gotta feed the DAC into something like an amp. I was only giving you choices of which ones to consider. I feel that any of the three DAC amps I mentioned work well with the Westone 3 and D2000, but I have not tried the 3MOVE with a D5000; although Skylab has and he ranked the 3MOVE and Pico amp as a tie in his review. I recommended the Pico because you want it for a computer and it's DAC is better than 3MOVE, while Skylab is only reviewing the amp not the DAC. I have a review of 12 DAC/amp combos that I am drawing suggestions from.
post #2245 of 3234
1/7/09 at 2:00am
Larry, why do not you put the link to your review into the sig?
post #2246 of 3234
1/7/09 at 2:31am
Just picked up a Lyrix Pro USB ....was wondering what opamp came in that stock?

Would my AD8610 work in that? or would i need 2 with the adapter?

Cant wait for it to get here...finally upgrading my very first amp ever purchased (Govibev3/AD8610)
post #2247 of 3234
1/7/09 at 2:40am
Quote:
Originally Posted by kostalex View Post
Larry, why do not you put the link to your review into the sig?
It's in my my public profile, with other review links in the about me section.
post #2248 of 3234
1/7/09 at 2:42am
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLife View Post
Just picked up a Lyrix Pro USB ....was wondering what opamp came in that stock?

Would my AD8610 work in that? or would i need 2 with the adapter?

Cant wait for it to get here...finally upgrading my very first amp ever purchased (Govibev3/AD8610)
It comes with the AD8397 and sounds very nice - you may not want to change opamps. I think it uses an LM6172 in the ground channel (4-channel amp). It's at least as good as the Meier Headsix.
post #2249 of 3234
1/7/09 at 3:00am
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadphoneAddict View Post
It comes with the AD8397 and sounds very nice - you may not want to change opamps. I think it uses an LM6172 in the ground channel (4-channel amp). It's at least as good as the Meier Headsix.

thanks larry =)
post #2250 of 3234
1/7/09 at 12:44pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skylab View Post
Not exactly. Via the USB DAC, and via unfamiliar headphones, and on just a quick listen, I thought it sounded OK. But when put through a level-matched, comparative test with my own headphones, I was less than impressed.
I'd be very interested in seeing what you thought of the Cute Beyond amp and see where you rank it compared to the others you have ranked. I love mine but I'm curious if there's better portables out there.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Portable Headphone Amps
This thread is locked  
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphone Amps › Review: Portable amp roundup! 56 portable amps reviewed and compared - FINAL update 12-20-10 added RSA SR-71B