Quote:
Originally Posted by Sordel 
I'm not sure what's good about the UM2 myself ... I'd guess that its benefits are transparency and even frequency response: is that what you mean, ATX? I ask because it's my current front-runner as a high-end IEM.
|
The um2 is the most balanced, natural-sounding headphone I've heard, even when compared to my full-size headphones. It has dead-accurate imaging, wide soundstage (as wide as the triport IE!), and able to project depth like the top sennheisers. The bass is deep, articulate, and very clean. The UM2 never sounds too hard, or too thin, or too anything with any type of music I've tried-- hence the most "balanced." It probably has the most perfect ADSR properties of any headphone I've heard, and certainly one of the most transparent-sounding.
The ksc75 has zero soundstage and no imaging capabilities at all. It has a fast attack speed so that certain notes sound too hard, but it also has a fast release so that when notes disappear, they just vanish without leaving any sense of depth, and makes virtually all types of music VERY uninvolving and "flat" sounding. The triport IEs, for example, has a good decay/release timing so that its very enjoyable to listen to live music--- they seem to draw you into the music in a very intimate way. Not so with the ksc75. It's also tonally unbalanced -- the bass and the extreme treble is artificially boosted resulting in a very weak midrange and very odd sounding at times, not to mention sibilant and metallic.
To say that the Vibe sounds like the ksc75, but its closest competitor is the UM2, makes NO sense at all. The KSC75 and UM2 are WORLDS apart.