Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › The Stax thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Stax thread - Page 152  

post #2266 of 2675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl View Post
The current Stax is a different company from who they were pre-1996.

Hmm... and this explains what?

Which company is responsible for the successful Omega IIs?

Seems like most companies evolve and change over the decades, maybe you could elaborate?

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Koss ESP-950 Electrostatic Stereophone
post #2267 of 2675
The 404 is not my cup of tea but then I doubt the older lambdas would be either. They'll be close enough for me not to care.
post #2268 of 2675
Some confusion here about the Stax nomenclature (what else is new)

The Lambda series seem to have had several iterations... there's the Lambda Signature, which I gather is 6 pins and normal bias.

The Lambda Pro I've been able to find on auction is Lambda Pro Nova... it also says BASIC on each earspeaker. Is this the Lambda Pro everyone enthuses over?

Then there's the Lambda Pro Classic, with a different name and different box design, still in production 8 years ago according to one seller. The box design is pretty close to the current SR-404.

Finally, the latest rectangular Stax phones, such as my SR-404, are still marked with a Greek lambda (upside-down V) symbol... Stax considers these to be Lambdas, or at least related to the earlier Lambdas?

Any help in sussing all this out would be greatly appreciated...

Patrick
post #2269 of 2675
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Downrange View Post
Hmm... and this explains what?

Which company is responsible for the successful Omega IIs?

Seems like most companies evolve and change over the decades, maybe you could elaborate?
Stax went under in 1995, and their president Takeshi Hayashi was forced from the company. Stax was restarted by a group of its former engineers a few months later. The Hayashis were always pushing the envelope and following new technologies, but the current ownership doesn't have the same vision.

The Omega II came out in 1998.
post #2270 of 2675
t makes my head hurt just thinking about all the lambda iterations
post #2271 of 2675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Downrange View Post
Wow, the last couple of pages have had quite a few negative comments about Stax latest mid-price line, the Signatures, 404s. I've not heard the old Lambda Pros, but they must have something special going for them. Or, maybe, there's some kind of group hypnosis going on here, who knows? It's kind of difficult to conceive that the Stax company is producing worse products than they were a decade or two ago, but who knows.
Here's a review of the 4040 system that compares very favorably against the vaunted Lambda Pros that seem to be so popular.
http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/stax2/stax.html
I'd like the chance to sample some of the old stuff to see if I can hear what he's talking about some day...
Don't get me wrong the 404s are still the current production phone under $500 that I would take. They are NOT BAD AT ALL by any means.
post #2272 of 2675
Quote:
Originally Posted by J Harris View Post
Some confusion here about the Stax nomenclature (what else is new)

The Lambda series seem to have had several iterations... there's the Lambda Signature, which I gather is 6 pins and normal bias.

The Lambda Pro I've been able to find on auction is Lambda Pro Nova... it also says BASIC on each earspeaker. Is this the Lambda Pro everyone enthuses over?

Then there's the Lambda Pro Classic, with a different name and different box design, still in production 8 years ago according to one seller. The box design is pretty close to the current SR-404.

Finally, the latest rectangular Stax phones, such as my SR-404, are still marked with a Greek lambda (upside-down V) symbol... Stax considers these to be Lambdas, or at least related to the earlier Lambdas?

Any help in sussing all this out would be greatly appreciated...

Patrick
Can't speak for the out-of-production models, but the manual that accompanied my ca. 2000 model SR-202's says SR-Lambda Series: SR-202 Basic, SR-303 Classic, and SR-404 Signature. So, they are Lambdas, just improved over the old models with thinner diaphragm.
post #2273 of 2675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl View Post
Stax went under in 1995, and their president Takeshi Hayashi was forced from the company. Stax was restarted by a group of its former engineers a few months later. The Hayashis were always pushing the envelope and following new technologies, but the current ownership doesn't have the same vision.

The Omega II came out in 1998.
So do the engineers have a better vision?
post #2274 of 2675
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by J Harris View Post
Some confusion here about the Stax nomenclature (what else is new)

The Lambda series seem to have had several iterations... there's the Lambda Signature, which I gather is 6 pins and normal bias.

The Lambda Pro I've been able to find on auction is Lambda Pro Nova... it also says BASIC on each earspeaker. Is this the Lambda Pro everyone enthuses over?

Then there's the Lambda Pro Classic, with a different name and different box design, still in production 8 years ago according to one seller. The box design is pretty close to the current SR-404.

Finally, the latest rectangular Stax phones, such as my SR-404, are still marked with a Greek lambda (upside-down V) symbol... Stax considers these to be Lambdas, or at least related to the earlier Lambdas?

Any help in sussing all this out would be greatly appreciated...

Patrick
Full list of the Lambda series:

SR-Lambda (1979, 230v)

SR-Lambda Pro (1982, 580v)

SR-Lambda Signature (1987, 580v)

SR-Lambda Spirit [aka SR-Lambda Pro Classic] (1992, 580v)

Lambda Nova Signature \
Lambda Nova Classic } (1994, 580v)
Lambda Nova Basic /

404 \
303 } (1999, 580v)
202 /
post #2275 of 2675
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Downrange View Post
So do the engineers have a better vision?
Not to my tastes. I loved seeing Stax come out with stuff like the SRM-T2, DMA-X2, and DAC-1Xt. Sadly this will never be repeated.
post #2276 of 2675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl View Post
Not to my tastes. I loved seeing Stax come out with stuff like the SRM-T2, DMA-X2, and DAC-1Xt. Sadly this will never be repeated.
Interesting, I've not heard of those. Someone should really pull all the info in this thread together, shake and bake, and produce a nice FAQ. (Or a book!)
post #2277 of 2675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl View Post
Full list of the Lambda series:

SR-Lambda (1979, 230v)

SR-Lambda Pro (1982, 580v)

SR-Lambda Signature (1987, 580v)

SR-Lambda Spirit [aka SR-Lambda Pro Classic] (1992, 580v)

Lambda Nova Signature \
Lambda Nova Classic } (1994, 580v)
Lambda Nova Basic /

404 \
303 } (1999, 580v)
202 /
Thanks Carl, this is very useful. I had no idea that the Signature post-dated the Pro. I hope that when people here post about these two models, they actually mean the 1982 and 1987 models that are listed above - no guarantee I suppose!

Some more questions! Which of these is normal bias and which pro bias? And where do the Sigma and Gamma ranges fall, datewise, statuswise and biaswise, with respect to the Lambdas?

I did find this useful link on the Stax site, btw... it's great so far as it goes, but could use more detail when you click on the links (mostly just pics), and since it's completely chronological it's hard to make sense of the structure of the line at any one date, let alone the technological and marketing developments in the history of the company:

http://www.stax.co.jp/Export/History.html

Some fascinating looking products though!

Patrick

Edit: the PDFs at the above link actually contain lots of useful information... not every product or product line has them, but sometimes you can find them attached to subsequent iterations of a product (e.g. SR-X Mk III, 1975).
post #2278 of 2675
@J Harris:

Normal biased are the ones with 230V; pro-biased are the 580V. Normal bias uses 6 plugs; pro-bias use 5 plugs.
post #2279 of 2675
Quote:
Originally Posted by derekbmn View Post
Don't get me wrong the 404s are still the current production phone under $500 that I would take. They are NOT BAD AT ALL by any means.
Well, the older stuff seems to have gotten priced out of the stratosphere, so I'm looking at possibly going with the 4040 set, at around 1200, or taking a much colder plunge into deep blue water for the OIIs.

I knew I was in trouble when my google search for Ipod buds turned up this place.
post #2280 of 2675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Downrange View Post
Well, the older stuff seems to have gotten priced out of the stratosphere, so I'm looking at possibly going with the 4040 set, at around 1200, or taking a much colder plunge into deep blue water for the OIIs.

I knew I was in trouble when my google search for Ipod buds turned up this place.
Currently, used (obviously cant get new) lambda pro's with SRM-1/MK2 drivers go for ~$600+shipping on ebay. I wont tell you that i caught a BIN for $250.
Anyway, i would look in that direction if you are willing to spend the money, obviously the impressions here are that the lambda pros outpace the 404's.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
This thread is locked  

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Koss ESP-950 Electrostatic Stereophone
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › The Stax thread