Jude,
Quote:
| Oh, and by the way, are you quoting me when you used the words “taken advantage of” in quotes? And can you point me to where you saw this quote or where I even established the spirit of such a statement? I’m asking honestly here, because I don’t recall making such a post. |
You're right, to the best of my knowledge, nothing was said publicly. I was talking out of school, and that's unfair. Again, as I said, I respect your trying to keep the board honest in terms of keeping commercial posts off the site. You were simply doing your duty as a mod and making sure things were on the up-and-up. I had no right to characterize your posting of this particular thread in the manner I did; I have no idea what your motivation was, I am not in fact psychic. I made a leap that *maybe* wasn't justified.
Quote:
| Again, I don’t think I owe anyone anything as a result of the brief review / dissection post. |
In another thread where you first hinted at your "operation" on the VD Basic, you teased people that you were going to expose the hidden secrets of the cable:
Quote:
| Regarding the cable cutting: the Virtual Dynamics cable cutting isn't intended as an exposé, but it was very interesting. I know they only charge $34.95 for this cable, but their web site does state that it "is designed to replace typical stock cord and to compete with the value of the most popular $500 power cords from the traditional electronic design theories," and so my opinions about its construction and performance will be influenced by these statements. |
Very craftily worded, but from that, it's pretty clear (to me) what you are insinuating-- you are going to expose the "snake-oil" of the VD cords, slamming their marketing of the cables and impugning the build quality of their bottom-of-the-line product. We had to wait for your "review" a while and then it appeared, after the build-up you gave it above.
Yes, I ascribed malevolent intent behind your post based on your comparison of a $35 cable with a $350 cable and a cross-section from a $900 cable. I still think this comparison is silly, and reveals nothing. That's my opinion, fine if you disagree.
Quote:
| Am I impressed with the build quality of this cable? Not really. Though I’ve not cut open a $500 power cable, I have cut open some $500 and $900 interconnects, a $150 headphone cable, and a couple of $250 digital cables, and found what appeared to me to be more complex internal designs and fancier materials (like Teflon and Teflon/air dielectrics, and fancy shielding, for example), not to mention what seemed to me like more uniform construction and symmetry, as well what looked to me like better cable body fit and finish from sheath to core. If I ever get the time, I’ll try to take some photos of some of these other cables I’ve cut open (in another thread, I did post some photos of a dissected section of Cardas Neutral Reference interconnect). Even a $10 Quail hospital grade power cord exhibits what looks to me like more uniform, symmetrical construction. |
Based on what I saw as the absurdity of this comparison, I decided the only reasonable explanation for your entire "review" was to slam Virtual Dynamics cables by questioning the build quality and the use of the "granular metallic stuff" in the design, when as you said yourself "NOTE: I am not an electrical engineer; nor do I have, or claim to have, any expertise in electrical engineering or cable design."
Quote:
| There you go again, Oliver (as in Oliver Stone). According to you, I’ve got an axe to grind. So according to you, a truly objective review of any Virtual Dynamics cable from me is impossible. Am I “big enough to admit that a VD cable could be any good?” Cripes, markl, what’s the matter with you? And you’re pointing fingers at me with words like “emotional attachment”? Re-read your posts and tell me what you see as the most obvious emotional attachment in this thread. |
You're right again. I took this too personally. I apologize.
Over time, I have come to know the good folks at Virtual Dynamics and find them to be great to deal with, extremely knowledgeable about cable design/theory, and incidentally, terrific human beings to boot, who happen to make the best "tweak" I've ever heard in my system.
I've recommended their cables to *everyone* I know in my audio circles, and to a man, they've all been blown away.
Maybe I was defending my friends there at VD a little (OK a lot) heavy-handedly. This post struck me as inherently unfair and that's why I said "you owed it" to us to do a fair evaluation with one of their better cables that really more closely matches the level of equipment you own and the other cables you've auditioned. I read this as an attack on their technology and their product line, but, yes, that's *my* interpretation. Did I really think you had any intention to replace your $350 cable and use the $35 Basic on your Max? No, but again, I'm ascribing motives to you with my psychic power. I'm still not sure why you even bothered with this cable given the level of the other products you are going to review. It makes no sense to me.
But I do ask you to consider that, as owner/operator of Head-Fi, your reviews carry a lot of weight. A lot of weight. I assume you can recognize that. They are as well-written and thoroughly documented as any on the site. Putting your name on a review (whether you agree with this or not) gives it a "Head-Fi stamp of approval", or at least gives it a sort of authority and aura that other reviews do not carry.
Mark